文化软实力的构成要素与发展模式研究
发布时间：2018-08-18 08:00
【摘要】：在哲学的视域里,全球化不局限于经济层面,而是包括政治、文化等社会各个领域的总体性进程。全球化所导致的国际范围内的交往和现代信息技术所支撑的数字化和网络化生存方式加速推进了全球性文化整合和世界文化的生成。面对全球化的文化整合,以争夺话语权为目的的文化强国战略,悄然流行于世界主要大国。文化软实力作为综合国力竞争的重要因素,也悄然流行于学术界。本文立基于马克思主义哲学视域,围绕着文化软实力的概念与其哲学理论基础、历史生成、结构要素、模式特征和批判发展等五个问题对文化软实力进行阐释,梳理了马克思主义理论中与文化软实力思想研究有关的史料,试图对文化软实力的哲学研究有所贡献。第一,文化软实力是指特定时代、特定地域、特定民族或特定人群在实践中历史地生成的文化所具有的创造力、凝聚力和传播力,以及由此产生的吸引力、感召力和影响力,它在国家社会生活中以及在国际综合国力竞争中都起着非常重要的作用。马克思恩格斯虽然没有明确提出关于文化软实力的具体概念,但是他们关于文化生产力理论、实践哲学理论、意识形态理论、文明形态理和异化理论,对我们研究文化软实力大有启发。第二,本文把历史的逻辑和现实的机制相结合,从文化作为现实的人的本质规定性同自然存在的明显差异去推测人的发生和文化的起源,然后从文化的发生和起源的假说来深化对文化软实力历史生成的理解。文化软实力的创造性、实践性和规范性是理解文化软实力的历史生成的三个主要维度。第三,作为一个哲学关系范畴,文化软实力包括主体、客体和中介三个要素。文化软实力的主体是从事实践活动的国家或民族,是自觉的反映者、改造者;文化软实力的客体是文化软实力主体在文化实践活动中直接的实践对象,它被文化主体所反映并改造。思维方式是文化软实力的中介性要素。作为一个历史生成的实践体系,文化软实力可划分为物质、制度和价值三个由浅入深的层次。文化软实力的外在表现力包括文化创造力、文化凝聚力和文化传播力等方面。第四,文化软实力模式是在时间或空间维度上,在一定时代形成的、以特定民族或国家为主体的、并为群体所普遍认同的稳定的内生的民族精神、价值取向、习俗礼仪等生存式样的典型特征,它以非强制的、潜移默化的方式制约和规范着行为主体。在共时态上,可以将文化软实力模式分为中华式、日本式、西方式、伊斯兰式、印度式、东正教式、拉丁美洲式和非洲式八种模式。在历时态上,以主导性文化模式的转换为参考系,可以将人类历史上的文化软实力划分为原始文明、农业文明和工业文明(及后工业文明)三大典型的文明式样。第五,通过考察马克思的异化理论、卢卡奇的物化理论和法兰克福学派的文化批判理论的发展脉络,为我们从文化批判视角审视文化软实力的整合与发展提供了思考空间。全球化信息化的今天,世界各国都在重视文化软实力的发展,构建我国文化软实力理论体系成为理论工作者文化自觉的当代回响。
[Abstract]:From the philosophical perspective, globalization is not confined to the economic level, but includes the overall process of political, cultural and other social fields. The international exchanges caused by globalization and the digital and network lifestyle supported by modern information technology accelerate the integration of global culture and the generation of world culture. The cultural integration of globalization and the strategy of cultural power with the purpose of contending for the right to speak are quietly popular among the major powers in the world. As an important factor in the competition of comprehensive national strength, cultural soft power is also quietly popular in academic circles. Five issues, namely, generation, structural elements, mode characteristics and critical development, are discussed to explain cultural soft power, comb the historical materials related to the study of cultural soft power in Marxist theory, and try to contribute to the philosophical study of cultural soft power. Firstly, cultural soft power refers to specific times, specific regions, specific nationalities or specific areas. The creativity, cohesion and dissemination of cultures historically generated by people in practice, as well as their attraction, appeal and influence, play a very important role in national social life and in the international competition for comprehensive national strength. Specific concepts, but their theories of cultural productivity, practical philosophy, ideology, civilization and alienation are of great enlightenment to our study of cultural soft power. Second, this paper combines the logic of history with the mechanism of reality, from the perspective of culture as the essential stipulation of human being to the obvious difference of natural existence. To speculate on the occurrence of human beings and the origin of culture, and then from the hypothesis of the occurrence and origin of culture to deepen the understanding of the historical generation of cultural soft power. It includes three elements: subject, object and intermediary. The subject of cultural soft power is the country or nation that practices in fact, the conscious reflector and reformer. The object of cultural soft power is the direct practice object of the subject of cultural soft power in cultural practice, which is reflected and reformed by the subject of culture. The mode of thinking is the cultural soft power. As a historical practice system, cultural soft power can be divided into three levels: material, system and value. The external expressive force of cultural soft power includes cultural creativity, cultural cohesion and cultural transmission. Fourthly, the mode of cultural soft power is in a certain time or space dimension. The typical characteristics of the living style, such as the stable endogenous national spirit, value orientation, custom and etiquette, formed by the times and generally accepted by the groups with a particular nation or country as the main body, restrict and regulate the behavior subject in a non-compulsory and imperceptible way. There are eight modes: Japanese, Western, Islamic, Indian, Eastern Orthodox, Latin American and African. In diachronic terms, the dominant cultural mode can be transformed into a reference system, and the cultural soft power in human history can be divided into three typical modes: primitive civilization, agricultural civilization and industrial civilization (and post-industrial civilization). Fifth, by examining the development of Marx's alienation theory, Lukacs'Materialization Theory and Frankfurt School's cultural criticism theory, we can see the integration and development of cultural soft power from the perspective of cultural criticism. Constructing the theoretical system of Chinese cultural soft power has become the contemporary echo of theoretical workers' cultural consciousness.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G122
[Abstract]:From the philosophical perspective, globalization is not confined to the economic level, but includes the overall process of political, cultural and other social fields. The international exchanges caused by globalization and the digital and network lifestyle supported by modern information technology accelerate the integration of global culture and the generation of world culture. The cultural integration of globalization and the strategy of cultural power with the purpose of contending for the right to speak are quietly popular among the major powers in the world. As an important factor in the competition of comprehensive national strength, cultural soft power is also quietly popular in academic circles. Five issues, namely, generation, structural elements, mode characteristics and critical development, are discussed to explain cultural soft power, comb the historical materials related to the study of cultural soft power in Marxist theory, and try to contribute to the philosophical study of cultural soft power. Firstly, cultural soft power refers to specific times, specific regions, specific nationalities or specific areas. The creativity, cohesion and dissemination of cultures historically generated by people in practice, as well as their attraction, appeal and influence, play a very important role in national social life and in the international competition for comprehensive national strength. Specific concepts, but their theories of cultural productivity, practical philosophy, ideology, civilization and alienation are of great enlightenment to our study of cultural soft power. Second, this paper combines the logic of history with the mechanism of reality, from the perspective of culture as the essential stipulation of human being to the obvious difference of natural existence. To speculate on the occurrence of human beings and the origin of culture, and then from the hypothesis of the occurrence and origin of culture to deepen the understanding of the historical generation of cultural soft power. It includes three elements: subject, object and intermediary. The subject of cultural soft power is the country or nation that practices in fact, the conscious reflector and reformer. The object of cultural soft power is the direct practice object of the subject of cultural soft power in cultural practice, which is reflected and reformed by the subject of culture. The mode of thinking is the cultural soft power. As a historical practice system, cultural soft power can be divided into three levels: material, system and value. The external expressive force of cultural soft power includes cultural creativity, cultural cohesion and cultural transmission. Fourthly, the mode of cultural soft power is in a certain time or space dimension. The typical characteristics of the living style, such as the stable endogenous national spirit, value orientation, custom and etiquette, formed by the times and generally accepted by the groups with a particular nation or country as the main body, restrict and regulate the behavior subject in a non-compulsory and imperceptible way. There are eight modes: Japanese, Western, Islamic, Indian, Eastern Orthodox, Latin American and African. In diachronic terms, the dominant cultural mode can be transformed into a reference system, and the cultural soft power in human history can be divided into three typical modes: primitive civilization, agricultural civilization and industrial civilization (and post-industrial civilization). Fifth, by examining the development of Marx's alienation theory, Lukacs'Materialization Theory and Frankfurt School's cultural criticism theory, we can see the integration and development of cultural soft power from the perspective of cultural criticism. Constructing the theoretical system of Chinese cultural soft power has become the contemporary echo of theoretical workers' cultural consciousness.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：G122
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 柳礼泉;丁蕾;;和谐文化建设与国家文化软实力的提升[J];湖南师范大学社会科学学报;2010年03期
2 杨述刚;;我国文化软实力建设需处理好五大关系[J];宁夏党校学报;2010年02期
3 项久雨;;论国家文化软实力的作用范畴[J];学习与实践;2009年12期
4 张s，
本文编号：2188852
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/rwkxbs/2188852.html
