国内保理合同司法实践问题研究

发布时间：2017-12-27 14:11

本文关键词：国内保理合同司法实践问题研究　出处：《吉林大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：保理,即保付代理,指保理商买下他人的债权,负责收回债款从而获得盈利的行为。保理对企业应收账款债权加以合理利用,将应收账款债权转变为资金,成为了获得融资的利器。当前,我国已发展成为世界上最大的保理市场,在国家提出要大力发展应收账款融资的利好政策的推动下,保理行业将迎来重要的发展战略机遇期。在看到保理发展前景的同时,也应该看到保理在我国发展较晚,因此存在规范保理合同的法律依据空缺,对保理合同性质认识不清,保理商风险防范意识和能力较低等问题,使得实践中产生大量保理合同法律纠纷。保理合同纠纷案件类型新颖,法律关系复杂,因此司法实践中对此类纠纷的处理产生了较多分歧和争议。分析我国当前有关保理合同的司法实践,发现保理合同司法实践中存在诸多问题,案由不定、管辖不清、当事人诉讼地位不明、虚假交易、债权转让规则不明确等,本文重点选取了司法实践中存在争议的三个基础问题进行研究,即案由问题、当事人诉讼地位问题和管辖问题。研究保理合同司法实践问题,首先需要了解保理以及保理合同。本文第一部分通过介绍保理的定义、发展、国内保理的定义和分类引出了保理合同法律关系,得出结论即保理的法律本质就是保理合同,在此基础上分析了保理合同法律关系的特征、构成要件、保理合同各方当事人权利和义务关系;其次,研究国内保理合同司法实践问题还需要了解国内保理合同司法实践现状,本文第二部分主要是保理合同的司法实践现状,从两个典型案例的分析对比再到对所收集案例整体进行数量、案由、当事人、管辖、法律适用等几个维度的分析,从不同层次了解保理合同司法实践现状;再次,研究保理合同同样需要分析司法实践中出现的问题,第三部分是论文核心部分,分别对案由问题、当事人诉讼地位问题、管辖问题这三个司法实践中的争议问题进行分析;最后,研究保理合同司法实践问题是为了解决问题,本文最后一部分主要针对我国国内保理的发展以及保理合同在司法实践中混乱的现状,提出了一般化的对策。本文研究的价值在于进一步加深了对保理合同法律关系的认识,分析了司法实践中保理合同的争议问题,为规范保理合同司法审判实务提供可借鉴的意见,并且为今后制定规范保理合同法律关系的法律规范奠定基础。
[Abstract]:Namely, factoring, factoring, factoring refers to buy other creditor's rights, responsible to recover the debt to obtain profit behavior. Factoring makes rational use of the debt receivable debt of the enterprise, transforming the accounts receivable into funds and becoming a tool for obtaining financing. At present, China has developed into the largest factoring market in the world. Under the impetus of the state's policy of vigorously developing accounts receivable financing, factoring industry will have an important strategic opportunity for development. After seeing the development prospects of factoring factoring at the same time, should also see late in China, so there is the legal basis for the specification of factoring contract for factoring vacancies, clear understanding of the nature of the contract, factoring business risk prevention awareness and ability low, which produces a large number of factoring contract legal disputes in practice. The types of disputes in the factoring contract are novel and the legal relationship is complex, so there are many differences and disputes in the handling of such disputes in the judicial practice. Analysis of China's current judicial practice about the factoring contract, there are many problems of factoring contract in judicial practice, the indefinite, the jurisdiction is not clear, the litigation status unknown, false trading, debt transfer rules are not clear, this article focuses on the three basic problems in the judicial practice in the dispute of the cause of action the problem, litigation status and jurisdiction. To study the judicial practice of factoring contract, it is necessary to understand factoring and factoring contract. The first part of this paper introduces the definition and classification of the definition, development, domestic factoring factoring leads to the factoring contract legal relationship, draw the conclusion that the legal nature of factoring is the factoring contract, based on the analysis of the characteristics, the factoring contract legal relationship of the constituent elements, the parties of factoring contract rights and obligations of the parties; secondly, the research of domestic factoring the contract also need to understand the problem of judicial practice of domestic factoring contract judicial practice, the second part is the present situation of judicial practice of factoring contract, from the comparative analysis of two typical cases to analyze the quantity, cause of action, the parties, jurisdiction, applicable law and several other dimensions of the collected cases overall, understand the present situation of judicial practice of factoring contract from different levels; thirdly, study the factoring contract also needs the analysis of the problems in judicial practice, the third part Is the core part of the thesis, which are analyzed by the dispute case jurisdiction, litigant status, these three problems in the judicial practice; finally, the research of factoring contract judicial practice problem is to solve the problem, the status quo in the judicial practice of chaos in the last part of this article mainly aims at our country in the development of factoring and factoring the contract, put forward the countermeasure of. The value of this research is to further deepen the understanding of the legal relationship of factoring contract, analyzes the controversial issues in the judicial practice of factoring contract, to provide reference for the specification of factoring contract judicial practice, and lay a solid foundation for the future development of the legal norms of factoring contract legal relationship.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.6

【参考文献】