私转他人支付宝账户资金行为定性研究
本文关键词:私转他人支付宝账户资金行为定性研究 出处:《安徽财经大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:在司法实践中,诈骗罪、信用卡诈骗罪、盗窃罪是极为常见的侵犯财产类犯罪。犯罪手段的多样性、新的犯罪形式的出现,使得对这几类犯罪的性质有时难以准确界定。由于在司法实践中司法主体对处分行为定性的把握存在一定差异,导致“同案不同判”的司法乱象,对法律的权威性和统一性造成不利影响。例如随着私转他人支付宝账户资金案件的日益增多,司法实践中对此类行为出现了诈骗罪、信用卡诈骗罪、盗窃罪等不同的司法认定,而经调查分析,此种类型犯罪中有许多案件存在极大的相似性,司法判决的结果不统一,恐会制约司法作用的发挥。为此,笔者通过对私转他人支付宝账户资金行为的一些典型案例的分析研究,并参考大量文献,归纳总结出此类案件三种形式,这三种形式在现实生活中具有多发性,是这类案件的典型代表。就这三种私转他人支付宝账户资金行为应当如何定性深入探究,否定了行为人构成诈骗罪和信用卡诈骗罪,得出了应当定性为盗窃罪的结论。首先,本文确定私转他人支付宝账户资金行为相关概念的内涵,通过对支付宝法律定位进行分析,对“私转”行为进行界定,明确研究对象及范围。其次,对私转他人支付宝账户资金行为的裁判案例进行归纳总结,分析不同的判决结果及理由,并对每一种判决结果进行评析,找出所争议的焦点问题:对支付宝处分行为的认定。最后,重点对私转他人支付宝账户资金行为的焦点问题即支付宝是否具有处分行为进行分析,并对与之认定相关的因素逐一考量,在借鉴国内外相关学者对处分行为的理论基础上,提出自己的见解,以期能够为私转他人支付宝账户资金行为的定性提供一定的参考。在研究方法上,采用横向比较和纵向分析相结合的方法,集中列举诸多案例,横向比较案例各种处理方式的利弊,寻找问题的本质所在。处分行为的认定问题是研究对象的本质,是定性研究对象的关键所在。通过对处分行为各个要素的纵向分析,为处分行为的认定提供了有力的理论支持,进而解决了私转他人支付宝资金行为的定性问题。
[Abstract]:In judicial practice, fraud, credit card fraud, theft is a very common crime against property, the diversity of criminal means, the emergence of new forms of crime. The nature of these crimes is sometimes difficult to define accurately. Due to the judicial subject in judicial practice, there are certain differences in the nature of disposition, leading to the judicial confusion of "different judgments in the same case". For example, with the increasing number of cases of private transfer of other people's Alipay account funds, there are fraud and credit card fraud in judicial practice. Larceny and other different judicial cognizance, but through investigation and analysis, there are many cases in this type of crime, there are great similarities, the result of judicial decision is not uniform, which may restrict the exertion of judicial function. The author through the private transfer of other people Alipay account fund behavior of some typical cases of analysis and research, and reference to a large number of literature, summed up this kind of cases three forms, these three forms of real life with multiple. It is a typical representative of this kind of cases. On the three kinds of private transfer of other people's Alipay account funds behavior should be qualitative and in-depth exploration, denying the perpetrator of the crime of fraud and credit card fraud. First of all, this paper determines the connotation of the concept of private transfer of other people's Alipay account funds behavior, through the analysis of the legal positioning of Alipay, the "private transfer" behavior is defined. Clear research object and scope. Secondly, the private transfer of other people Alipay account fund behavior of the judgment cases are summarized, analysis of different decisions and reasons, and each kind of judgment results are evaluated. To find out the focus of the dispute: to determine the behavior of Alipay disposition. Finally, focus on the private transfer of other people Alipay account fund behavior focus problem, that is, whether Alipay has a disciplinary action to analyze. And with the identification of the relevant factors one by one to consider, in reference to domestic and foreign scholars on the theoretical basis of disciplinary action, put forward their own views. In order to provide a certain reference for the qualitative analysis of the private transfer of other people's Alipay account capital behavior. In the research method, the combination of horizontal comparison and vertical analysis method, concentrated enumeration of many cases. Comparing the advantages and disadvantages of various ways of dealing with cases horizontally to find the essence of the problem. The problem of the identification of disciplinary action is the essence of the object of study. It is the key of the qualitative research object. Through the longitudinal analysis of the various elements of the disposition behavior, it provides a strong theoretical support for the identification of the disposition behavior. And then solve the qualitative problem of private transfer of other people's Alipay fund behavior.
【学位授予单位】:安徽财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 韩卓然;;“支付宝”运营模式下的相关法律问题探究[J];法制与社会;2011年29期
2 ;把闲钱放在“支付宝”里更划算[J];中国工会财会;2014年02期
3 任蕙兰;;支付宝的金融野心[J];新民周刊;2013年25期
4 陆建国;;支付宝的恐惧和机遇[J];法人杂志;2009年06期
5 孙书林;;支付宝诈骗模式及其防范策略[J];江苏警官学院学报;2009年03期
6 甘晓晨;;互联网企业自治规则研究——以支付宝规则为例[J];法律和社会科学;2010年01期
7 ;警方提醒:支付宝诈骗又出新“变种”[J];中国防伪报道;2014年03期
8 张兴华;;从“支付宝”谈网上第三方支付平台的法律问题[J];职业时空;2008年02期
9 沈利军;徐伟;;支付宝虚拟账户支付的法律分析及规制[J];金融与经济;2009年06期
10 沈利军;徐伟;;支付宝虚拟账户支付的法律分析及规制[J];贵州警官职业学院学报;2009年05期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 ;支付及金融衍生类电子商务企业的发展创新[A];中国电子商务企业发展报告2013[C];2013年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 郝楠;从支付宝看网上购物信用体系[N];中国企业报;2007年
2 杨国强;先于阿里巴巴支付宝台湾探路[N];第一财经日报;2007年
3 ;支付宝为网店销售带来了什么?[N];电脑商报;2008年
4 戴远程;支付宝用户数突破1亿[N];南方日报;2008年
5 徐晓巍;支付宝承诺购物受骗全额赔偿[N];中国证券报;2008年
6 南方日报记者 戴远程;支付宝牵手联通加速“生活化”[N];南方日报;2009年
7 魏晨;126家境外商户签约支付宝[N];国际商报;2010年
8 本报记者 周婷;支付宝启动手机安全支付[N];中国证券报;2010年
9 正望咨询副总裁 周洪美;支付宝价值几何?[N];北京商报;2011年
10 记者 程婕;捷星航空与支付宝达成战略合作协议[N];中国民航报;2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 曾U,
本文编号:1410821
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1410821.html