论我国刑辩律师侦查阶段的执业困境及权利保障
发布时间:2018-01-12 17:41
本文关键词:论我国刑辩律师侦查阶段的执业困境及权利保障 出处:《青岛大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:作为刑事诉讼的基石,侦查阶段在刑事诉讼过程中极为重要。因为侦查阶段取得的证据和掌握的事实将直接影响到未来的审判结果。在侦查阶段,最为关键的是对犯罪嫌疑人的人权保护。而侦查阶段对于犯罪嫌疑人的人权保护程度是可以从刑辩律师介入侦查阶段的自由度和权利广泛与否来体现的。为了强化刑辩律师的地位和作用,我国现行法律法规赋予了刑辩律师更广泛的权利。2012年,第11届全国人大常委会第29次会议通过了《全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改〈中华人民共和国律师法〉的决定》。律师法的修改是对律师(尤其是刑辩律师)重要性的一种肯定。但此举仍然改变不了我国律师的弱势地位。我国律师制度总体上仍然十分脆弱,律师在诉讼过程中的权利仍有待进一步完善和发展。如刑辩律师在侦查阶段的权利仍然不完整;刑辩律师在执业过程中缺乏相应的保障措施;侦查机关和社会公众对刑辩律师的认识存在偏差。与此同时,侦查机关权利过大,对其的监督机制过少。这很容易使得犯罪嫌疑人的基本权利受到侵犯。即使侦查机关侵犯了犯罪嫌疑人的合法权利,事后救济措施和补救措施都是有限的。刑辩律师不能够有效的为犯罪嫌疑人在侦查阶段提供法律服务。这使得控辩双方提供的证据不对等,影响接下来在庭审程序中的辩护效果,使得审判程序中的控辩对抗沦为一种形式。
[Abstract]:As a cornerstone of criminal procedure, the investigation stage in the process of criminal procedure is very important. Because of the investigation stage to obtain the evidence and facts will directly affect the future of the outcome of the trial. In the investigation stage, the key is the protection of human rights of criminal suspects. And the protection of human rights for criminal suspects in the investigation stage degree can be from the criminal defense lawyers in the investigation stage of the degree of freedom and rights are widely or not to reflect. In order to strengthen the status and role of lawyers, China's current laws and regulations give lawyers more extensive rights in.2012, the eleventh session of the twenty-ninth meeting of the NPC Standing Committee passed the "Standing Committee of the National People's Congress decision. Law on Amending the law." People's Republic of China is modified to the lawyer (especially lawyers) a certain importance. But it still does not change Our country's weak position. Our legal system is still very weak, the rights of lawyers in litigation process still needs further improvement and development. Such as criminal defense lawyers in the investigation stage right is still not complete; the lawyers lack the appropriate security measures in the process of practice; deviation of investigation organs and society public awareness of the criminal defense lawyer. At the same time, the investigation organ right is too large, too little of the supervision mechanism. It is very easy to make the basic rights of criminal suspects have been violated. Even if the investigation organ infringes the legitimate rights of criminal suspects, relief measures and remedial measures are limited. The lawyers can not be effective the suspect in the investigation stage to provide legal services. This makes the evidence provided by both parties are not equal, then affect the defense in the trial procedure in effect, the trial process The conflict of accusation in the order is reduced to a form.
【学位授予单位】:青岛大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D925.2;D926.5
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 卞建林;王进喜;陈卫东;王新清;;依法保障律师执业权利专家笔谈[J];中国司法;2015年10期
2 黄yN;;我国刑辩律师执业环境的思考[J];时代金融;2015年15期
3 曾粤兴;;法治视野下的律师辩护权——兼评高法刑诉法解释(征求意见稿)第250条[J];时代法学;2013年01期
4 李文芳;何建聪;;辩护律师调查取证权的法理学分析[J];湖北警官学院学报;2013年01期
5 ;《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》修正前后对照表[J];人民检察;2012年08期
6 李红琳;;论律师在场权与侦查权的博弈与平衡——写在《刑事诉讼法修正案》出台之前[J];法制与社会;2012年11期
7 陈学权;;侦查期间合理限制律师会见权研究[J];现代法学;2011年05期
8 陈光中;汪海燕;;侦查阶段律师辩护问题研究——兼论修订后的《律师法》实施问题[J];中国法学;2010年01期
9 陈海平;;侦查阶段律师帮助:制度价值、国际标准与域外经验[J];安庆师范学院学报(社会科学版);2010年01期
10 王金华;余经林;;试论侦查阶段的辩护律师阅卷权——以新《律师法》的不足为视角[J];法治研究;2009年04期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 刘计划;;律师辩护制度向前再进一大步[N];法制日报;2011年
,本文编号:1415300
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1415300.html