私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达的正当性论证

发布时间：2018-02-16 21:26

本文关键词： 私力救济自媒体意见表达价值分析正当性标准　出处：《天津商业大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在私力救济视角下,自媒体意见表达被用作私力救济的工具,具有低成本、高效益的优势,被网络用户广泛采用。然而由于缺乏法律的规制和引导,权利人在利用自媒体意见表达实现权利救济的过程中,难以掌握行为的边界,导致救济过度而转化成侵权行为的结果。司法实践中对因自媒体意见表达侵犯人格权所引起的纠纷,也因缺少充分的法律依据和统一的法律适用标准,裁判结果几乎都是“一刀切”,认定为侵权,然而并非所有的利用自媒体实现私力救济的行为都是侵权行为。造成上述困境的根本原因,就在于对私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达的正当性,缺乏一个判定标准。在本文中,笔者尝试从民法和媒体法两个角度分析影响私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达正当性标准的要素,在此基础上论证利用自媒体意见表达实现私力救济行为的正当性,并据此提出判定自媒体意见表达实现私力救济的正当性标准。以期既能充分发挥自媒体意见表达的优势,又能对自媒体意见表达作出限制,为自媒体意见表达实现私力救济的正当性划定范围,为权利人利用自媒体意见表达实现私力救济,提供法律保障和依据,避免因过度救济引发侵权后果的发生,并为司法实践提供一个明确的法律适用标准,解决司法适用难题。第一部分,“前言”。主要介绍了本文写作的现实和理论意义、拟解决的问题及研究方法,起到提纲挈领的作用。第二部分,“私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达法律规制面临的困境”。本章从司法实践中法律适用标准和理论研究两个角度,呈现了私力救济私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达所面临的双重困境,为本文写作的主题进行背景上的铺垫。第三部分,“权利人选择自媒体意见表达实现私力救济的原因”。本章从自媒体意见表达与私力救济的关系、自媒体意见表达实现私力救济所具备的优势两方面,对实践中权利人选择自媒体意见表达实现私力救济的原因进行分析。以期站在行为人行为动机的角度去讨论行为的正当性。第四部分,“私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达的法价值分析及制度基础”。本章拟从法理基础和制度基础两个角度,以民法和媒体法为切入点,探讨自媒体意见表达实现私力救济的理论和制度基础。结合“权利价值位阶”、“自助行为理论”、“债务人容忍义务”、“言论豁免权和‘避风港原则’”及“自媒体自净规则”等方面研究私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达正当性的理论和制度基础。第五部分,“私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达的正当性标准及具体适用”。本章在总结上述几部分论述的基础上,提出私力救济视角下自媒体意见表达正当性的标准,即从行为的正当性和合理性两方面阐述自媒体意见表达实现私力救济行为的正当性。依托司法实践中的案例,分析自媒体意见表达实现私力救济与义务人的隐私权及名誉权发生冲突时,权利人行为的正当性。从而回扣全文主题,破解司法实践中自媒体意见表达实现私力救济的法律适用难题。
[Abstract]:In the private relief perspective, since the media opinion expression is used as a self-help tool, has the advantages of low cost, high efficiency, is widely used by Internet users. However, because of the lack of legal regulation and guidance, the right people in the use of media opinion expression process to achieve the right to relief, it is difficult to grasp the behavior boundary. Lead to excessive relief into the infringement results. In judicial practice, due to the media opinion expression of personality rights violations caused by the dispute, but also because of the lack of legal basis and legal standard unified fully, the referee results almost all "identified as infringement, but not all of the media to achieve self-help behavior is causing the plight of infringement. The fundamental reason lies in the relief, legitimacy from the perspective of media opinion on the expression of private power, the lack of a judgment standard in this paper. The author tries to analyze the influence, the private relief from the perspective of two aspects of civil law and media law elements from the media opinion expression standard of justice, on the basis of demonstration by media opinion expression realization of the legitimacy of self-help behavior, and puts forward views of implementation from the media to determine the legitimacy of private relief standards. In order to give full play to the advantages of self expression and media opinion, restrictions on the expression of opinion from the media from the media, opinion expression legitimacy range realization of private remedy, since the media opinion expression is private relief use rights, provide legal guarantee and basis, avoid excessive lead to the tort relief consequences, and provide a clear legal standard for the judicial practice, to solve the problem of judicial application. In the first part, "Introduction". This paper mainly introduces the writing of practical and theoretical significance And the problems to be solved and research methods, plays a leading role. In the second part, "private relief from the perspective of media opinion Legal Regulation dilemma". Two aspects of this chapter from the law applicable standards in judicial practice and theoretical research, presents the private relief of private relief from the perspective of media opinion expression of double dilemma, writing for this theme on the background of the bedding. The third part, "the right choice from the media opinion" implementation of private relief. This chapter from the expression of media opinion and private relief, since the media opinion expression of two aspects of the private remedy advantage in practice right choice since the media opinion expression reasons for private relief were analyzed. In order to stand in the legitimacy of the behavior motivation perspective to discuss the behavior. The fourth part, "private saving From the perspective of economic law from the media opinion expression value analysis and system basis. This chapter from two aspects of legal basis and system basis, with civil law and media law as the starting point, to explore the media opinion expression theory and system basis of private remedy. "With the right order of value", "self-help behavior the theory", "debtor tolerance obligations", "speech immunity and" safe haven "principle" and "self purification media rules and other aspects of the private relief from the perspective of media opinion expression theory and institutional legitimacy. The fifth part," private relief standard of justice from the perspective of media opinion and expression the specific application ". This chapter summarizes the above parts, proposed the private relief from the perspective of media opinion expression of the legitimacy of the standard is described from the media from the behavior of the legitimacy and rationality of two aspects The views expressed the proper implementation of self-help behavior. Based on the analysis of the case in the judicial practice, since the media opinion expression of private remedy right of privacy and reputation rights and obligations of the conflict, the legitimacy of human rights behavior. Thus the rebate text of the theme, crack in the judicial practice since the media opinion expression of applicable law problem private remedy.

【学位授予单位】：天津商业大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923

【参考文献】