论中南半岛地缘战略区位的主体间性研究

发布时间：2018-02-17 01:59

本文关键词： 主体间性地缘战略地缘战略区位中南半岛　出处：《云南师范大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：由于大国不断的更换地缘战略楔子,中南半岛及中南半岛各国在大国之间的几轮地缘战略角逐中,虽然绝对地理位置没有改变,但其地缘战略区位价值却几经变换。近年来,随着日本“北进南下”、印度“东进”、中国共建“一带一路”、美国“重返亚太”及“亚太再平衡”等地缘战略在中南半岛的交叠实施,大国在中南半岛地区的博弈更加剧烈,中南半岛地缘战略区位价值受大国战略影响越发突显。因而,引发了更多国内外学者对其地缘战略区位价值的高度关注。本文通过对海权论、陆权论、边缘地带论、门户论、大棋局等地缘战略理论分析,得出不同地缘战略理论强调了不同的地缘战略区位,同时由于地缘战略本身具有主体间性,而区位则隶属于地缘战略,进而推导出地缘战略区位具有主体间性的结论。并以中南半岛为例,通过考察分析二战时期、冷战早期、冷战中后期、冷战后期及当代大国战略影响下的中南半岛地缘战略区位演变情况,解释了为何在大国博弈下中南半岛及中南半岛各国的绝对地理位置没有改变,但其地缘战略区位的相对位置却发生了变化,从而进一步论证地缘战略区位具有主体间性。最后从主体间性角度展望未来我国所要面对的中南半岛地缘环境,并就我国未来对中南半岛的地缘战略抉择提出建议。
[Abstract]:Due to the constant change of geo-strategic wedge among the major powers, the countries of the Indochina Peninsula and the Indochina Peninsula have changed several times in their geostrategic values in the several rounds of geo-strategic competitions between the great powers, although the absolute geographical position has not changed, but the value of their geostrategic location has changed several times in recent years. With the overlapping implementation of such geo-strategies as Japan's "northward south", India "eastward", China's co-construction of "Belt and Road", the United States "returning to the Asia-Pacific region" and "Asia-Pacific rebalancing" in the Indochina Peninsula, the game between major powers in the Indochina Peninsula has become more intense. The geostrategic location value of Indochina Peninsula is more and more prominent by the influence of great power strategy. As a result, more and more scholars at home and abroad pay close attention to its geo-strategic location value. This paper discusses the sea power theory, the land power theory, the marginal zone theory, the portal theory, and so on. Based on the analysis of geo-strategic theories such as big chess game, it is concluded that different geostrategic theories emphasize different geo-strategic locations. At the same time, geo-strategy itself has inter-subjectivity, and location belongs to geo-strategy. Then the conclusion that geo-strategic location has inter-subjectivity is deduced. Taking Indochina Peninsula as an example, through investigation and analysis of the period of World War II, the early Cold War, the middle and late Cold War, The evolution of geostrategic location in Indochina Peninsula in the late Cold War period and under the influence of contemporary great power strategy explains why the absolute geographical position of Indochina Peninsula and Indochina Peninsula countries has not changed under the big power game. However, the relative position of geo-strategic location has changed, which further proves that geo-strategic location has inter-subjectivity. Finally, from the perspective of inter-subjectivity, the author looks forward to the future geoenvironment of Indochina Peninsula in China. And put forward suggestions on the future geostrategic choice of Indochina Peninsula.
【学位授予单位】：云南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D815.3

【相似文献】