民事诉讼按撤诉处理制度研究

发布时间：2018-02-26 18:21

本文关键词： 按撤诉处理法定情形申辩权同意权　出处：《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：按撤诉处理,是指法院根据法律规定,基于提出诉的原告当事人特定的不作为,而终结诉讼程序并撤销该案件的行为。作为撤诉制度的重要组成部分,自1982年《民事诉讼法(试行)》开始,按撤诉处理制度便一直存在于我国民事诉讼体系中。在司法实践中,由于按撤诉处理制度本身立法上的不足,给予了法官异化适用按撤诉处理的机会,导致了按撤诉处理制度的立法价值难以实现。因此,要根治按撤诉处理制度的异化适用现象、弥补制度本身的不足,就需要结合按撤诉处理制度的理论基础和汲取域外相关制度中的优秀立法,对立法进行完善,以实现该制度本来的价值。本论文除前言、结语外,共有四章,分别围绕按撤诉处理的理论研究、适用现状、立法分析、域外借鉴与完善来展开论述,各部分主要内容如下:前言:概述按撤诉处理制度,简要交代本文的写作背景与写作要点。第一章:对按撤诉处理的基本理论做出较为全面的分析。包括概念辨析、理论依据、制度功能。第二章:对按撤诉处理制度异化适用的现状审视。包括对适用现状的描述、异化适用的原因、异化适用的后果。第三章:对按撤诉处理制度立法上的分析。第四章:对域外相关立法的比较与借鉴以及论述具体的完善路径。对于域外相关立法的比较与借鉴部分,本文主要选取了美国、日本、法国、俄罗斯以及德国的相关制度作为比较的对象,在经过与域外相关立法比较后,获得完善我国按撤诉处理制度的启示。最后结合前述的分析,论述了完善我国按撤诉处理制度的具体方法。结语:总结本论文的大概内容,并指出论文中存在的不足之处。
[Abstract]:According to the case, is refers to the court according to the law, not as the plaintiff party specific lawsuit based on the end procedure and the revocation of the case. As an important part of withdrawal system, since 1982 "Civil Procedure Law (Trial)", as a case handling system has been existed in China's civil litigation system. In judicial practice, due to lack of legislation on the processing system itself as a case, the judge gave the opportunity for treatment by withdrawal of alienation, led to the legislative value of treatment system as a case is difficult to achieve. Therefore, to eliminate the alienation phenomenon for treatment system as a case, make up for the deficiency of the system itself, you need to on the basis of the theory system as a case and draw in the outstanding legislation extraterritorial related system, to perfect the legislation, in order to realize the value of the original system. In addition to the preface and epilogue, A total of four chapters, respectively around according to theoretical research, case application status, legislative analysis, extraterritorial reference and perfection to discuss, the main content of each part is as follows: Introduction: an overview of treatment by withdrawal system, writing background and writing points a brief explanation in this paper. The first chapter: make a comprehensive analysis on the basic theory of press withdrawal of treatment. Including the concepts, theoretical basis, system function. The second chapter: the survey of treatment status system alienation applicable by withdrawal. Including application of the description of the status quo, reasons for the alienation, alienation results applicable. The third chapter: Analysis on the legislation system as a case. The fourth chapter: the comparison extraterritorial legislation and reference and discusses the specific improvement path. For the comparison and reference of extraterritorial legislation, this paper selected the United States, Japan, France, Russia and Germany to the relevant system As the object of comparison, after comparison and foreign related legislation, to obtain perfect treatment system as a case in our country. Finally, combined with the foregoing analysis, discusses the specific methods to improve the processing system as a case in China. Conclusion: summarize the general content, and pointed out the inadequacies.

【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】