辩证推理在司法过程中的规范适用研究

发布时间：2018-03-04 16:03

本文选题：辩证推理　切入点：司法过程　出处：《长春理工大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文是将辩证推理作为一种思维方法,运用在司法过程中,寻找可适用的法律规则。在司法过程中,由于法律规则的不确定和适用法律依据的多样、灵活,造成法官寻找可适用法律规则的过程复杂、困难。为使案件有法可依、维护法律普适性的同时保证个案正义、弥补法律的局限性和促进法律的改革创新和发展,辩证推理与形式推理、法律解释、法律论证、价值判断和利益衡量相互结合,共同作用于寻找可适用的法律规则。辩证推理是从抽象到具体的方法,需要在目的标准、操作标准和评价标准的指导下,发挥辩证推理的证成功能、解决争端和社会控制的功能、预测功能,解决法律规则模糊不清、法律规则间相互冲突、法律规则存在漏洞等法律规则不确定的情形。同时,以公平正义观实质审查法律规则的合法合理性,根据司法实践具体分析法律规则的实用性,揭示辩证推理来自正义回归正义的过程。
[Abstract]:This is a kind of thinking method of dialectical reasoning as applied in the judicial process, find the applicable law rules. In the judicial process, because of the rule of law and the uncertainty of the applicable legal basis of diversity, flexibility, resulting in search of rules of applicable law to judge the complex and difficult. In order to make the case according to the law, safeguard suitable law and ensure universal justice, make up for the limitations of the law and promote the innovation and development of the law, dialectical reasoning and formal reasoning, legal interpretation, legal argumentation, value judgment and interest measure combined with each other, work together to find the rules of law applicable. Dialectical reasoning is from the abstract to the concrete method in the objective need, standards, operation standards and evaluation criteria under the guidance of dialectical reasoning into the card play function, the settlement of disputes and the function of social control, prediction function, solve the fuzzy rule of law Clearly, conflict between legal rules, legal rules and loopholes exist in the rule of law is not determined. At the same time, the rule of law to the substantive examination of fairness and justice rationality, according to the practical analysis of judicial practice of the rule of law, reveals the dialectical reasoning from justice justice regression process.

【学位授予单位】：长春理工大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D90-051

【相似文献】