专家辅助人管理制度研究

发布时间：2018-03-05 05:11

本文选题：专家辅助人　切入点：管理制度　出处：《中国政法大学》2017年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：2012年修改的《刑事诉讼法》创设了一些新的制度,其中《刑事诉讼法》第一百九十二条:“公诉人、当事人和辩护人、诉讼代理人可以申请法庭通知有专门知识的人出庭,就鉴定人作出的鉴定意见提出意见。”规定了专家辅助人制度。2013年1月1日正式实施的我国《民事诉讼法》第七十九条:“当事人可以申请人民法院通知有专门知识的人出庭,就鉴定人作出的鉴定意见或者专业问题提出意见。”在民事诉讼领域也确立了这一制度。在此之前,2001年《最高人民法院关于行政诉讼证据若干问题的规定》第四十八条:“对被诉具体行政行为涉及的专门性问题,当事人可以向法庭申请由专业人员出庭进行说明,法庭也可以通知专业人员出庭说明。”在行政诉讼程序中确立了专家辅助人制度。自此三大诉讼法保持了一致,标志着这一制度在我国的全面确立。这些规定是立法上对理论界在专家辅助人制度方面长期研究探索的正面回应,为我国司法制度的一大进步。但是不得不承认,新《刑事诉讼法》、新《民事诉讼法》实施以来实践中专家辅助人的适用率偏低。为了不让专家辅助人制度流于形式,充分发挥其应有的作用,对专家辅助人的探索依旧任重而道远。因此,本选题的目的就是以专家辅助人为研究对象,从专家辅助人的管理为切入点,详细分析描述专家辅助人管理的必要性、管理的客体、主体、具体制度等,以期能对此制度提供一些有益建议。本论文主要分为四部分:第一章,专家辅助人管理必要性分析。这一部分分四节,四节分别从专家辅助人的角色定位、功能、行业属性以及我国专家辅助人实践情况等方面对专家辅助人管理的必要性进行分析,最终得出专家辅助人需要管理的结论。第二章,专家辅助人主体资格。这一部分分两节,两节分别介绍国外专家辅助人及类似制度中的专家资格及我国专家辅助人制度有关专家主体资格的问题,分析当前中国专家辅助人主体资格方面存在的问题及相应的对策。其中第二节从我国司法实践中专家辅助人主体问题出发,结合我国司法鉴定实践,建议将我国专家辅助人进行分类,并相应的在主体资格方面制定不同的标准。第三章,专家辅助人管理模式。这一章分四节,先分别介绍三种管理模式:法律管理主导型、行政管理主导型、行业管理主导型。然后分析三种管理模式的利弊,最终选择适合的管理模式。第四章,专家辅助人管理制度的具体设想。这一部分承接第三章,共分为四节,四节分别从法律管理、行政管理、审判管理、行业管理四方面提出对专家辅助人管理的具体设想。
[Abstract]:The Criminal procedure Law, which was amended in 2012, created a number of new systems, in which article 192th of the Code of Criminal procedure states: "Public prosecutors, parties and defenders, and ad litem agents may apply to the court to notify persons with expertise to appear in court." The article 79th of China's Civil procedure Law, which was formally implemented in January 1st 2013, states: "the parties may apply to the people's court to notify a person with expertise to appear in court," "this system has also been established in the field of civil litigation. Prior to this, the provisions of the Supreme people's Court on certain issues concerning evidence in Administrative Proceedings, 2001" (40th). Article 8: "to deal with the special problems involved in the specific administrative act of being sued," A party may apply to the court for a statement by a professional, or the court may notify a professional to appear in court... "the system of expert auxiliaries has been established in administrative proceedings... since then the three major procedural codes have been consistent," These provisions are a positive response to the long term research and exploration of the expert assistant system in the theoretical circle and a great progress in the judicial system of our country. Since the implementation of the new Code of Civil procedure, the application rate of the expert assistant is on the low side. In order not to allow the expert assistant system to become a mere formality and to give full play to its due role, Therefore, the purpose of this topic is to take the expert assistant person as the research object, from the expert assistant person management as the breakthrough point, to analyze the necessity of describing the expert assistant person management in detail. This paper is divided into four parts: the first chapter, the analysis of the necessity of expert assistant management. This part is divided into four sections. The four sections analyze the necessity of expert assistant person management from the following aspects: role orientation, function, industry attribute and practice of expert assistant person in our country, and finally draw the conclusion that expert assistant person needs to be managed. This part is divided into two sections, which respectively introduce the qualification of experts in foreign countries and similar systems, and the problems related to the qualification of experts in the system of expert auxiliaries in our country. This paper analyzes the problems existing in the qualification of the subject of expert assistant in China and the corresponding countermeasures. The second section starts from the problem of the subject of expert assistant in judicial practice in our country and combines the practice of judicial expertise in our country. It is suggested to classify our country's expert auxiliaries and to formulate different standards in terms of subject qualification accordingly. Chapter three, Management Model of expert Auxiliaries. This chapter is divided into four sections. First, it introduces three kinds of management modes: legal management-oriented, and so on. After analyzing the advantages and disadvantages of the three management modes, the author finally chooses the suitable management mode. 4th chapter, the concrete idea of the expert assistant person management system. This part carries on the third chapter, altogether divides into four sections, The four sections put forward the concrete ideas of expert assistant management from four aspects: law management, administration management, trial management and industry management.
【学位授予单位】：中国政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】