公共道路碰瓷行为定性分析
发布时间:2018-03-21 22:39
本文选题:道路碰瓷 切入点:理论基础 出处:《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:公共道路碰瓷行为作为一种新型的碰瓷方式,在开始之初,方式较为单一,行为人一般采取在公共道路上突然倒在车辆前,假装被撞的方式来索要财物。行为人索要财物较少,危险性也相对较小,但随着这种“碰瓷”现象的不断发展,公共道路碰瓷行为的实施者由单人作案发展到团伙作案,方式也更为复杂。在“人碰车”的方式中有“自残碰瓷”、“利用伤残碰瓷”、“利用工具碰瓷”,在“车碰车”的方式中,更有甚者选择在部分高速公路上碰瓷。行为人采取此方式侵害了公民的财产法益,在受害人不从的情况下,会采取暴力、语言等方式胁迫受害人,情节恶劣,社会危害性越来越大,应予以严厉的惩处。我国学界对于公共道路碰瓷行为应如何定罪,观点不一。在实践中,公共道路碰瓷行为的定罪也存在较大差异,经常会出现“同案不同判”的现象,不利于我国司法权威的维护和社会的稳定。为了更好地对公共道路碰瓷行为进行定罪量刑,要先对此行为的性质进行分析,对该行为进行科学的定性,在此基础上再定罪量刑,有利于贯彻罪刑法定原则,实现司法的公平、公正。
[Abstract]:As a new type of porcelain impact behavior, the behavior of public road touching porcelain is relatively simple at the beginning, the actor generally takes the way of suddenly falling in front of the vehicle on the public road and pretending to be hit to ask for property. The danger is relatively small, but with the continuous development of this phenomenon, the perpetrators of public road porcelain impact have developed from single crime to gang crime. The methods are also more complicated. In the way of "people touching cars", there are "self-maiming and touching porcelain", "using the disabled to touch porcelain", "using tools to touch porcelain", and in the way of "cars touching cars", What's more, some people choose to touch porcelain on some freeways. The perpetrator used this way to infringe upon the property interests of the citizens. If the victim does not follow, he will use violence, language and other methods to intimidate the victim, and the circumstances are abominable. The social harmfulness is becoming more and more serious and should be severely punished. There are different views on how to convict the public road porcelain impact behavior in Chinese academic circles. In practice, there are also great differences in the conviction of the public road porcelain impact behavior. There is often a phenomenon of "different judgments in the same case", which is not conducive to the maintenance of judicial authority and social stability in our country. In order to better convict and sentence the public road collision with porcelain, we must first analyze the nature of this act. It is beneficial to carry out the principle of legally prescribed punishment for a crime and to realize the fairness and justice of judicature on the basis of the scientific characterization of the act and the reconviction and sentencing on the basis of it.
【学位授予单位】:烟台大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D924.3
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陈兴良;;口袋罪的法教义学分析:以以危险方法危害公共安全罪为例[J];政治与法律;2013年03期
2 劳东燕;;以危险方法危害公共安全罪的解释学研究[J];政治与法律;2013年03期
3 王有强;;浅谈对“汽车碰瓷”犯罪行为的定性[J];朝阳法律评论;2010年02期
4 范新伟;;浅析“碰瓷”行为的刑法定性[J];赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版);2010年10期
5 孙万怀;;以危险方法危害公共安全罪何以成为口袋罪[J];现代法学;2010年05期
6 周玉文;;略论利用机动车“碰瓷”侵财行为的性质认定[J];洛阳理工学院学报(社会科学版);2010年03期
7 曲新久;;论刑法中的“公共安全”[J];人民检察;2010年09期
8 戴瑞春;;“碰瓷”事件是敲诈勒索还是诈骗[J];当代广西;2009年14期
9 陈伟;;“车辆碰瓷”行为的定性分析——以一则典型案例为视角[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2008年04期
10 路楠;李治;;试论交通管理中以危险方法危害公共安全行为的定罪查处[J];道路交通与安全;2008年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 于志刚;;“碰瓷”却致同伙死亡的行为如何定性[N];人民法院报;2007年
,本文编号:1645913
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1645913.html