民事诉讼电子数据证据效力研究

发布时间：2018-04-13 13:13

本文选题：电子数据证据 + 效力　；参考：《烟台大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：《最高人民法院关于适用〈中华人民共和国民事诉讼法〉的解释》(以下简称《民诉法解释》)于2015年2月4日起正式公布实施,其对作为民事证据类型的电子数据证据进行了法律上明确的定位和规范。但在立法层面与司法实务过程中,电子数据证据的理论与操作方面仍有亟待解决的问题,笔者结合工作经验,在一个新的框架下进行电子数据证据的效力论证。受电子数据证据与时俱进的时代特性影响,目前我国电子数据证据立法存在漏洞,审判实践中存在症结。笔者通过分析工作实务案例,从证据资格与证明力方面入手,进一步找出认定电子数据证据效力过程中存在的障碍。纵观全文来看,结合论证,笔者对于立法及司法领域有针对性的提出完善意见。立法论层面,宏观上树立立法模式理念,微观上搭建具体制度细化电子数据的认定程序;司法论层面上,注重程序集群建构,按诉讼进程脉络,在庭审开始前,规范电子数据的采集、保全等集群。另一方面,在庭审过程中,提出专家人相关制度、瑕疵证据排除制度、举证质证制度等制度集群。
[Abstract]:The interpretation of the application of the Civil procedure Law of the people's Republic of China by the Supreme people's Court (hereinafter referred to as the interpretation of the Civil procedure Law) was officially promulgated and implemented on February 4, 2015.The electronic data evidence, which is the type of civil evidence, is clearly positioned and regulated in law.However, in the process of legislation and judicial practice, there are still some urgent problems in the theory and operation of electronic data evidence.Under the influence of electronic data evidence advancing with the times, there are loopholes in the legislation of electronic data evidence in our country at present, and there are sticking points in the trial practice.Based on the analysis of practical cases, the author tries to find out the obstacles in the process of determining the validity of electronic data evidence from the aspects of evidence qualification and proof power.Throughout the full text, combined with argumentation, the author of the legislative and judicial areas to put forward targeted suggestions.At the level of legislation theory, we should set up the idea of legislation mode on the macro level, set up the concrete system to refine the identification procedure of electronic data on the micro level; on the level of judicial theory, we should pay attention to the construction of procedure cluster, according to the process of litigation, before the beginning of the trial,Standardize electronic data collection, security and other clusters.On the other hand, in the trial process, put forward the expert related system, defect evidence exclusion system, evidence cross-examination system and other institutional clusters.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.1

【参考文献】