当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 社科硕士论文 >

利益衡量标准研究

发布时间:2018-04-16 18:06

  本文选题:利益 + 利益衡量 ; 参考:《东北师范大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:20世纪初,概念法学逐渐走向没落,利益法学逐渐兴起,日本学者在利益法学的基础上把利益衡量论本土化,使之与日本法律规则相协调。20世纪90年代,梁慧星教授将利益衡量论带入到我国,时至今日,司法案件中随处可见利益衡量的影子,但是从判决的内容来看,各有差异,也就是说衡量的标准非常之模糊,有的判决甚至很难看出究竟适用了何种标准,值得承认的是,利益衡量的适用使得判决的实质性结果更为公正,但这仅仅只是相对于没有适用利益衡量所作的判决。实际上,利益衡量作为法官行使自由裁量权的体现,同样也需要受到约束,限权思想同样也适用利益衡量理论,规范利益衡量最为理想的办法就是确定利益衡量标准,究竟要构建何种利益衡量标准来应对当今复杂的利益关系,是研究利益衡量理论的要求,更是法治民主化的需要。本文意在确定利益衡量标准,以此来规范法官利益自由裁量权,使得司法判决更趋向于合法、合理化,文章从结构上分四部分:第一部分是利益衡量标准的概述部分,此部分包括利益衡量标准相关概念的界定、利益衡量标准理论问题评述,以及适用利益衡量标准的必要性,这一部分意在为全文的研究提供理论基础。第二部分是利益衡量标准问题的反思,包括影响利益衡量标准的因素分析、利益衡量标准难题所在、利益衡量标准的目标问题以及利益衡量标准的理想模式,此部分是为下一部分做铺垫。第三部分构建利益衡量标准模型,主要包含利益衡量标准模型的构建步骤、利益的划分和评价、价值位阶以及比例的设定,此部分是本文写作的主旨部分。第四部分论述利益衡量标准模型如何适用。以“索特公司与新万基公司合同纠纷案”为例,意在论证本文所提倡的利益衡量标准模型是具有现实意义的,是具有可操作性的。
[Abstract]:At the beginning of the 20th century, the concept of law gradually declined, and the law of interests gradually rose. Japanese scholars localized the theory of interest measurement on the basis of the law of interest, making it coordinate with the Japanese legal rules in the 1990s.Professor Liang Huixing brought the theory of interest measurement into our country. Up to now, the shadow of interest measurement can be seen everywhere in judicial cases. However, judging from the content of the judgment, there are differences, that is to say, the standard of measurement is very vague.Some judgments are even difficult to see what criteria are applied. It is worth acknowledging that the application of interest measurement makes the substantive outcome of the judgment more just, but this is only relative to the judgment made without applying the measure of interest.In fact, as the embodiment of the judge's discretion, the measure of interests also needs to be restricted. The idea of limiting the right also applies to the theory of the measurement of interests. The most ideal way to standardize the measurement of interests is to determine the standard of measuring interests.What kind of interest measurement standard should be constructed to deal with the complex interest relationship is the requirement of studying the theory of interest measurement and the need of democratization of the rule of law.The purpose of this paper is to determine the standard of interest measurement, so as to standardize the discretion of the judge's interests, and to make the judicial decision more legal and reasonable. The article is structured into four parts: the first part is an overview of the standard of interest measurement.This part includes the definition of the relevant concepts of the interest measurement standard, the comment on the theory of the interest measurement standard, and the necessity of applying the interest measurement standard. This part is intended to provide the theoretical basis for the research of the full text.The second part is the reflection of the standard of interest measurement, including the analysis of factors that influence the standard of interest measurement, the difficult problem of the standard of interest measurement, the goal problem of the standard of interest measurement and the ideal model of the standard of interest measurement.This part is to pave the way for the next part.The third part constructs the standard model of interest measurement, which mainly includes the steps of constructing the standard model of interest measurement, the division and evaluation of interest, the setting of value rank and proportion. This part is the main purpose of this paper.The fourth part discusses how to apply the standard model of interest measurement.Taking the case of contract dispute between Sot Company and Xinwangji Company as an example, it is intended to prove that the standard model of interest measurement advocated in this paper has practical significance and maneuverability.
【学位授予单位】:东北师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D916

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 梁上上;;制度利益衡量的逻辑[J];中国法学;2012年04期

2 张伟强;;利益衡量及其理论的反思——一个经济分析的视角[J];法学论坛;2012年04期

3 陈晓英;;中国社会主流价值观分析[J];辽宁师范大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期

4 朱瑞;朱国平;;论利益衡量的正当化[J];法制与社会;2008年21期

5 杜月秋;;论裁判的正当性基础 以法律效果和社会效果的相互关系为视角[J];法律适用;2007年03期

6 陈金钊;;法治、法律方法与法律智慧[J];山东警察学院学报;2006年05期

7 吕世伦;;论德沃金的“整体性法律”理论[J];山东社会科学;2006年07期

8 暍哲夫;王充;;法益概念与多元的保护法益论[J];吉林大学社会科学学报;2006年03期

9 梁慧星;从法律的性质看裁判的方法[J];金陵法律评论;2005年01期

10 陈兴华,李娜;论利益衡量在民法适用中的展开[J];云南大学学报(法学版);2004年06期



本文编号:1760020

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1760020.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户ad8af***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com