行业协会限制竞争行为的反垄断法规制研究

发布时间：2018-04-17 14:32

本文选题：法律规制 + 体系完善　；参考：《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：近几年行业协会限制竞争行为案件在国内频繁出现,2016年湖北省工商行政管理局对湖北省保险行业协会作出了行政处罚,因其组织本行业经营者从事垄断协议行为,这个案件在社会上引起了广泛关注。我国《反垄断法》明确提出对行业协会限制竞争行为进行规制,然而并没有对其进行详细的规范,这不利于对行业协会限制行为的准确判断和法律规制。为了更好地促进市场的良性发展,维护社会整体利益与消费者的切身权益,必须规范行业协会的限制竞争行为。本文分为四个章节:第一部分论述了行业协会基本理论,阐释了行业协会限制竞争行为的表现形式和危害性,其表现形式有集体抵制、价格卡特尔、信息交换及标准化认证等多种形式,其次从自由竞争秩序与消费者权益方面论述了其危害性,最后从法学理论基础探讨了其规制的必要性。第二部分提出我国法律规制行业协会限制竞争行为的不足,首先是立法方面,立法体系的不完善,违法性认定标准不健全,法律责任制度的不全面。再者是执法方面,执法机构的不协调,私人诉讼制度的发展滞后。第三部分对域外日本、美国、欧盟等国家和地区的行业协会限制竞争行为的规制状况进行了考察,比较分析了美欧日的规制重点与特色,为后文我国法律的完善提供了思路。第四部分针对我国行业协会限制竞争行为存在的问题,从立法与执法两大方面提出了几点建议。首先建议制定指南,为实践提供具体操作细则,然后是建议制定行业协会的违法性认定机制,紧接着提出了完善我国法律责任体系与执行体系的相关措施。
[Abstract]:In recent years, cases of restricting competition behavior by trade associations have frequently occurred in China. In 2016, the Hubei Provincial Administration for Industry and Commerce imposed administrative penalties on the Hubei Insurance Industry Association for organizing its own industry operators to engage in monopolistic agreements.The case has aroused widespread concern in society.The Anti-monopoly Law of our country clearly proposes to regulate the restrictive competition behavior of the trade association, but it has not been regulated in detail, which is not conducive to the accurate judgment and legal regulation of the restrictive behavior of the trade association.In order to promote the healthy development of the market and safeguard the overall interests of the society and the immediate rights and interests of consumers, it is necessary to regulate the restrictive competition behavior of trade associations.This paper is divided into four chapters: the first part discusses the basic theory of the trade association, explains the manifestation and harm of the trade association restricting competition behavior, its manifestation forms include collective resistance, price cartel.Information exchange and standardized authentication are the main forms. Secondly, the harmfulness is discussed from the aspects of free competition order and consumers' rights and interests. Finally, the necessity of its regulation is discussed on the basis of the theory of law.In the second part, the author points out that the limitation of competition behavior of the trade association in our country is not enough. Firstly, the legislation system is not perfect, the standard of illegality is not perfect, and the legal liability system is not comprehensive.Furthermore, the law enforcement, law enforcement agencies are not coordinated, the development of private litigation system lags behind.In the third part, the author makes an investigation on the regulation of restrictive competition behavior in foreign countries and regions, such as Japan, the United States, the European Union and other countries and regions, compares and analyzes the key points and characteristics of the regulations of the United States, Europe and Japan, and provides a train of thought for the perfection of our country's laws.The fourth part puts forward some suggestions from two aspects of legislation and law enforcement in view of the problems existing in restricting competition behavior of China's trade associations.First of all, the author suggests to make a guide to provide specific operating rules for practice, and then proposes to establish a mechanism for determining the illegality of trade associations, and then puts forward relevant measures to improve the legal liability system and the enforcement system of our country.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】