重大行政决策程序中专家论证问题研究
发布时间:2018-05-13 07:22
本文选题:重大行政决策 + 行政决策程序 ; 参考:《天津商业大学》2017年硕士论文
【摘要】:在我国全面深化改革的时代背景下,完善重大行政决策程序对推进依法治国方略的实施、建设法治政府具有重要意义。十八大以来,党中央和国务院在相关文件中决定公众参与、专家论证、风险评估、合法性审查、集体讨论决定为重大行政决策法定程序。随着政策和法制的不断完善,专家论证程序在重大行政决策中的地位逐渐加强。但是,在实践中,重大行政决策专家论证程序仍存在着专家被政府或利益团体雇佣、专家管见和越位、规范重大行政决策专家论证制度的缺乏、重大行政决策专家论证程序的不合理等问题,严重影响重大行政决策的科学性。为此,需要加强重大行政决策程序中专家论证问题的研究,促进重大行政决策专家论证功能的发挥,以提升重大行政决策的效果。本文以重大行政决策程序为基础,借鉴国内外的文献资料,通过比较分析法与案例分析法,对重大行政决策专家论证的相关概念及理论基础、存在的问题、问题出现的原因、对策方面进行了分析和论述。文章首先在明确了研究的背景、目的及意义、研究的思路及方法、研究创新点的基础上,对重大行政决策专家论证的相关概念进行界定,如行政决策程序、行政决策与重大行政决策、重大行政决策专家论证。并以程序正义理论、专家理性理论作为本文的理论支撑。其次,以重大行政决策专家论证中存在的问题为研究对象,从专家被政府或利益团体雇佣、专家管见和越位、规范重大行政决策专家论证制度的缺乏、重大行政决策专家论证程序的不合理等方面进行了论述,并对导致我国重大行政决策专家论证问题出现的原因进行深入剖析。研究发现,我国传统文化的负面影响、重大行政决策程序立法的缺位以及重大行政决策论证专家自身的局限性是导致重大行政决策专家论证问题出现的重要因素。最后,根据重大行政决策专家论证存在的问题分析,从加强行政法治文化建设、完善重大行政决策专家论证的制度建设、规范重大行政决策专家论证程序建设、提升专家的公信力以及完善立法等方面提出对策建议,从而促进重大行政决策专家论证功能的实现。
[Abstract]:In the background of China's comprehensive deepening of the reform, it is of great significance to improve the major administrative decision-making procedure to promote the implementation of the rule of law and to build a government ruled by law. Since eighteen, the Party Central Committee and the State Council have decided to participate in the relevant documents, the expert argument, the assessment of the risk, the examination of the legitimacy, and the decision of the collective discussion as the major administration. With the continuous improvement of policy and legal system, the status of the expert demonstration program in major administrative decisions is gradually strengthened. However, in practice, the expert demonstration procedure still exists that experts are employed by the government or interest groups, experts are seen and offside, and the lack of expert argumentation system is standardized. The problems of the unreasonable procedure of the major administrative decision experts seriously affect the scientificalness of the major administrative decisions. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the research on the problem of expert demonstration in the major administrative decision-making procedure, promote the function of the demonstration of the major administrative decision experts, and improve the effect of the major administrative decision. This paper is based on the major administrative decision-making procedure. On the basis of the literature at home and abroad, through the comparative analysis and case analysis, the relevant concepts and theoretical bases of the argument of the major administrative decision experts, the existing problems, the reasons for the problems and the countermeasures are analyzed and discussed. The article first clarifies the background, purpose and significance of the research, and the thinking and prescription of the research. On the basis of the research innovation point, it defines the relevant concepts of the argument of the major administrative decision experts, such as the administrative decision procedure, the administrative decision and the major administrative decision, the demonstration of the experts in the major administrative decision, and the theoretical support of the procedural justice theory and the expert rational theory. The problem is the research object, the expert is employed by the government or the interest group, the expert is seen and offside, the lack of the expert argumentation system of the major administrative decision-making, the unreasonable aspects of the demonstration procedure of the major administrative decision experts are discussed, and the reasons for the problems that lead to the demonstration of the major administrative decision experts in China are deeply analyzed. The study finds that the negative influence of Chinese traditional culture, the absence of the major administrative decision-making procedure legislation and the limitations of the experts of major administrative decision and demonstration are the important factors that lead to the problem of the argument of the major administrative decision experts. Finally, the analysis of the existing problems in the demonstration of the major administrative decision-making experts is to strengthen the administrative rule of law. The construction of cultural construction, the improvement of the system construction of the demonstration of major administrative decision-making experts, the standardization of the construction of the procedure for demonstration of experts in major administrative decision-making, the promotion of the credibility of experts and the improvement of legislation are put forward in order to promote the realization of the function of the demonstration of the experts in major administrative decisions.
【学位授予单位】:天津商业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.1
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王万华;宋烁;;地方重大行政决策程序立法之规范分析——兼论中央立法与地方立法的关系[J];行政法学研究;2016年05期
2 魏阙;边钰雅;;日本大数据技术服务现状及对我国的启示[J];创新科技;2015年07期
3 熊樟林;;重大行政决策概念证伪及其补正[J];中国法学;2015年03期
4 聂帅钧;;构建重大行政决策终身责任追究制度的困境与路径选择[J];行政与法;2015年04期
5 周衍冰;;大数据产业在法国的发展及应用[J];服务外包;2014年06期
6 黄学贤;桂萍;;重大行政决策之范围界定[J];山东科技大学学报(社会科学版);2013年05期
7 陈金钊;;用法治思维抑制权力的傲慢[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2013年02期
8 张忠;;专家参与行政决策的功能及其实现[J];理论月刊;2013年02期
9 徐文新;;专家、利益集团与公共参与[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2012年03期
10 李卫华;;专家参与行政:现状、取向与法律规范[J];新视野;2012年02期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 刘平;费文婷;丁立;王天品;王晓妹;高俊;;上海市重大行政决策程序研究报告[A];2009年政府法制研究[C];2009年
,本文编号:1882218
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/1882218.html