刑事诉讼中的庭前审查程序研究

发布时间：2018-05-13 21:16

本文选题：庭前审查程序 + 公诉权　；参考：《贵州师范大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：从世界各个主要发达国家来看,刑事诉讼中的庭前程序包含着两个子程序,一个是庭前审查程序,也叫公诉审查程序,一个是庭前准备程序;前者主要为了限制检察机关的不当起诉和保障犯罪嫌疑人的人权,而后者主要为了保障诉讼的顺利展开以及诉讼的效率。虽然我国的2012年《刑事诉讼法》完善了一些刑事庭前程序的内容,但是其中庭前准备程序的内容远远多于庭前审查程序的内容,且规定的庭前审查程序也只做程序性审查,这就使庭前审查程序的功能打了折扣,甚至于说根本就没有起到作用。随着我国十八届四中全会做出的全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定,以审判为中心的刑事诉讼制度改革也跃然纸上,其中重要的就是改革庭前审查程序。因为只有庭前审查程序的优化,才能真正保障审判的中心地位,而不至于让审判流于形式化。所以笔者尝试通过比较国外相关制度的方法来对我国刑事诉讼中的庭前审查程序进行初步研究,并期望在结合我国国情和现有制度的情况下,能设计出一些有效的措施来优化我国刑事庭前程序中的审查程序。本文共分四个部分。第一部分是对刑事庭前审查程序的概述,主要是对其概念、特征、内容、功能、目的的叙述。第二部分是对我国刑事庭前审查程序现状的描述,通过其中得出一些问题。第三部分是对世界几个发达国家的刑事庭前审查的制度的介绍,然后通过评析其制度来得出启示。第四部分就是在对我国制度现状及其问题的分析基础上,给出解决的思路以及改革的措施,让我国的刑事庭前审查程序也发挥其应有的功能。
[Abstract]:From the major developed countries in the world, the pretrial procedure in criminal proceedings contains two subroutines, one is the pretrial review procedure, also known as the public prosecution review procedure, and the other is the pretrial preparation procedure; The former mainly aims to limit the prosecution by procuratorial organs and to protect the human rights of criminal suspects, while the latter is mainly to ensure the smooth development of the proceedings and the efficiency of the proceedings. Although our country's Criminal procedure Law in 2012 has perfected the content of some criminal pretrial procedure, but the content of pretrial preparation procedure is much more than that of pretrial review procedure, and the prescribed pretrial review procedure only does procedural review. This makes the pre-trial review process less functional, or even ineffective. With the decision made by the fourth Plenary session of the 18th Central Committee of our country to comprehensively promote the administration of the country by law, the reform of the criminal procedure system centered on trial has also jumped to paper, among which the important one is to reform the pretrial examination procedure. Only through the optimization of the pretrial review procedure can the central position of the trial be ensured and the trial be formalized. Therefore, the author tries to make a preliminary study on the pretrial review procedure in criminal proceedings in China by comparing the relevant foreign systems, and expects that under the condition of combining the national conditions and the existing system of our country, Some effective measures can be designed to optimize the review procedure in the criminal pretrial procedure in China. This paper is divided into four parts. The first part is an overview of the pretrial review procedure, including its concept, characteristics, content, function and purpose. The second part is the description of the present situation of the pretrial review procedure in China, through which some problems are found. The third part is the introduction of the system of criminal trial review in several developed countries, and then through the evaluation of its system to draw inspiration. The fourth part is on the basis of the analysis of the present situation and problems of our country's system, gives the solution thought and the reform measure, lets our country's criminal pretrial examination procedure also play its due function.
【学位授予单位】：贵州师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】