中国式辩诉交易价值理论与实践探寻

发布时间：2018-05-17 05:27

本文选题：辩诉交易 + 认罪认罚从宽　；参考：《首都经济贸易大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：发源于美国的辩诉交易制度由于在司法实践中的良好效果,突破了大陆法系和英美法系的界限,得到了诸多国家的移植和效仿,但争议和诟病却从未停止。我国过去的司法机制中一直没有大胆适用辩诉交易,直到2014以后才在一些案件审判中进行了辩诉交易的尝试.。2016年2月14日最高人民检察院表示将探索建立辩护律师参与下的认罪、量刑协商制度,从顶层开始推动中国的辩诉交易实践。北京市检察系统率先提出在刑事速裁案采用“认罪协商”机制,北京市朝阳区人民检察院也正在研究专门针对职务犯罪和轻刑犯罪案件的认罪协商机制。这些改革举措和实践已经表明辩诉交易制度在我国司法中已经势在必行。然而,即使面对铁腕改革,然而一些学子仍不承认这是"中国式辩诉交易"的定性。如今全国已有18个试点区域根据各自实际情况积极开展刑事速裁程序试点并取得显著成效,配合这些实践需要进行法学理论的研究和探讨,在此,有必要做好相关的法学理论奠基。在此,有必要梳理并深度剖析辩诉交易在中国推行受阻以及“由冷变热”发展的原因,以回答理论方面的一些质疑。故本文将从辩诉交易制度的产生、发展、内在的法理等方面对辩诉交易进行较为全面的介绍,由辩诉交易制度内在最具代表性的正义与效率、权力与权利、秩序与自由这三对冲突性价值入手研究冲突性价值之间的关系,并具体到我国的历史与现实框架下挖掘价值冲突产生的原因,进一步在价值均衡、价值商谈、协商主义的理论指导下回归迫切的实践需要,肯定中国式辩诉交易——刑事速裁与认罪认罚从宽对于破解我国当前司法难题的重要意义。
[Abstract]:The plea bargaining system originated in the United States has broken the boundaries of civil law system and common law system because of its good effect in judicial practice, and has been transplanted and imitated by many countries, but the controversy and criticism have never stopped. In the past, China's judicial mechanism has not applied plea bargaining boldly. On 14 February 2016, the Supreme people's Procuratorate said that it would explore the establishment of a system of plea pleas and sentencing negotiations with the participation of defense lawyers. From the top level to promote the practice of plea bargaining in China. Beijing procuratorial system is the first to put forward the mechanism of "plea bargaining" in criminal cases. The people's Procuratorate of Chaoyang District of Beijing is also studying the mechanism of plea negotiation for crimes of duty crime and light punishment. These reform measures and practice have indicated that plea bargaining system is imperative in our country. However, even in the face of iron reform, some students still do not accept this as a "Chinese plea bargaining." At present, there are 18 pilot regions in the country that have actively carried out the trial of criminal speedy adjudication procedures according to their respective actual conditions and have achieved remarkable results. In order to meet the needs of these practices, we need to conduct research and discussion on legal theories. Here, It is necessary to lay the foundation of relevant legal theories. Here, it is necessary to comb and analyze in depth the reasons for the blocking of plea bargaining in China and the development of "from cold to hot" in order to answer some questions in theory. Therefore, this paper will introduce the plea bargaining from the aspects of the emergence, development and inherent legal theory of plea bargaining system, and the justice and efficiency, power and right, which are the most representative system of plea bargaining system, will be introduced in this paper. The three pairs of conflicting values, order and freedom, begin to study the relationship between conflicting values, and excavate the causes of value conflicts under the historical and realistic framework of our country, and further explore the value balance and value negotiation. Under the guidance of the theory of negotiationism, we return to the urgent practical needs and affirm the important significance of the Chinese plea bargaining-criminal quick adjudication and the leniency of pleading guilty and penalizing to solve the current judicial problems in our country.
【学位授予单位】：首都经济贸易大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】