公证债权文书的强制执行相关问题研究

发布时间：2018-05-18 21:24

本文选题：公证债权文书 + 强制执行效力　；参考：《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：对公证债权文书依法赋予强制执行效力,使文书所载明的权利义务关系不必再经过诉讼程序即可直接得以强制执行,是大陆法系国家立法的成功经验,是国家强制力在公证活动中的特殊体现。公证是静态司法,审判是动态司法,从这个意义上讲,公证债权文书的强制执行制度就是“静态司法”活动转换为“动态司法”活动的过程。是国家强制力在公证活动中的体现。它对充分发挥公证职能规范民事经济活动和及时调整民事经济关系,维护正常的法律秩序和保护当事人的合法权益具有重要的作用。本文第一章重点阐述公证债权文书强制执行制度的基本原理,探讨该制度的基本原理主要是围绕公证债权文书为何能够作为法院强制执行的依据,这个问题进行分析,从理论上明确公证债权文书强制执行制度存在的必要性。内容涉及公证债权文书强制执行制度的历史进程、赋予公证债权文书强制执行效力的公证行为的性质、公证债权文书能够强制执行的理论依据以及强制执行公证制度的价值。第二章重点阐述了公证债权文书在法院强制执行的过程中所涉及的相关争议性问题,并对争议问题提出笔者的一些个人看法,内容涉及法院执行公证债权文书所参考的依据、公证债权文书的司法审查、公证债权文书确有错误情形的认定以及申请公证债权文书强制执行的期限。第三章重点阐述强制执行公证制度的救济。内容涉及公证机关不予签发执行证书的救济、被执行人申请不予执行、案外人申请不予执行、公证机关复查救济的探讨以及虚假强制执行公证的解决方式,明确公证机关审查公证债权文书时,应当尽到的切实的审查义务。
[Abstract]:It is the successful experience of the civil law countries to enlist the enforcement effect of the notarized creditor's rights according to the law, so that the relationship between the rights and obligations contained in the documents can be directly enforced without the need of the litigation procedure. It is the special embodiment of national compulsion in notarization. Notarization is static justice and trial is dynamic justice. In this sense, the enforcement system of notarized creditor's rights is the process of transforming "static justice" into "dynamic justice". It is the embodiment of national compulsion in notarization. It plays an important role in bringing the notarization function into full play, standardizing civil economic activities and adjusting civil economic relations in time, maintaining normal legal order and protecting the legitimate rights and interests of the parties concerned. The first chapter focuses on the basic principles of the compulsory enforcement system of notarized creditor's rights documents, and discusses the basic principles of the system mainly around why the notarized creditor's rights documents can be used as the basis for the enforcement of the court, which is an analysis of this problem. In theory, the necessity of compulsory execution of notarized creditor's rights is clear. The content involves the historical process of the compulsory enforcement system of notarized creditor's rights, the nature of the notarization act that endows the compulsory enforcement effect of the notarized creditor's rights document, the theoretical basis for the compulsory enforcement of the notarized creditor's rights document and the value of the compulsory notarization system. The second chapter focuses on the relevant controversial issues involved in the enforcement of notarized creditor's rights documents in the court, and puts forward some personal views of the author, including the basis for the court to carry out the notarized creditor's rights documents. The judicial review of the notarized creditor's rights document, the confirmation of the erroneous situation of the notarized creditor's rights document and the time limit for applying for the compulsory execution of the notarized creditor's rights document. Chapter three focuses on the relief of compulsory notarization system. The content involves the relief that the notary authority does not issue the execution certificate, the person who applies for the execution does not apply for the execution, the other person in the case applies not to execute, the notary organ re-examines the relief and the solution of the false enforcement notarization. When the notary authority examines the notarized creditor's rights document, it should fulfill the obligation to examine the notarized creditor's rights.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D926.6

【相似文献】