论行政诉讼的集中管辖制度

发布时间：2018-05-31 15:23

本文选题：行政诉讼集中管辖 + 独立审判　；参考：《南昌大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：十八大以来,党中央、国务院大力推进依法治国建设,建设法治中国成为我国社会发展的一项战略目标。但是,“我国目前行政诉讼容易受到当地党政机关的干扰,再加上一些法院无案可办,一些法院案积如山,还有些法院对行政案件采取消极推诿的态度,这些情况不仅有损司法威信,也伤害了党群之间的鱼水之情”(1)。党中央、国务院、最高人民法院为了改善这种局面,审时度势,进行了一系列的行政诉讼管辖改革试点工作,希望通过管辖内容改革减轻直至消除基层政府及部门对行政诉讼的干扰,从而保障社会的公平正义。行政诉讼集中管辖制度就是一些地区在党中央、国务院、最高人民法院的正确指引下改革试验的成果。2013年1月,最高人民法院发布了通知,《通知》规定:在全国范围内将一些基层人民法院管辖的第一审行政案件,通过上级人民法院统一指定的方式,交由其他基层人民法院集中管辖。为了弥补集中管辖制度的不足,在新修订《行政诉讼法》中将设立跨区域集中管辖法院写入其中。党中央、国务院、最高人民法院通过一系列改革,希望维护人民群众的根本利益、维护司法的公平正义。本文从案例出发,通过行政诉讼集中管辖制度第一案来阐述行政诉讼集中管辖制度的探索背景。通过对其概念、特征、分类及其实行原因的分析来说明行政诉讼集中管辖所具有的积极意义以及存在的问题。本文的第五章系统阐述了行政诉讼集中管辖制度的未来发展方向是建立专门行政法院。
[Abstract]:Since the 18th National Congress, the CPC Central Committee and the State Council have vigorously promoted the construction of governing the country according to law, and the construction of a China ruled by law has become a strategic goal of our country's social development. However, "at present, administrative proceedings in our country are vulnerable to interference by local party and government organs. In addition, some courts have no cases to deal with, some courts have accumulated cases, and some courts have adopted a negative attitude of prevarication to administrative cases. These conditions not only undermine judicial authority, but also hurt the relationship between the party and the masses. In order to improve this situation, the CPC Central Committee, the State Council, and the Supreme people's Court have carried out a series of pilot work on the reform of administrative litigation jurisdiction. It is hoped that the interference of grass-roots governments and departments in administrative litigation can be alleviated and even eliminated through the reform of jurisdiction content so as to ensure the fairness and justice of the society. The system of centralized jurisdiction in administrative proceedings is the result of a reform experiment conducted by some regions under the correct guidance of the CPC Central Committee, the State Council and the Supreme people's Court. The Supreme people's Court has issued a circular, and the "notice" stipulates that administrative cases of first instance under the jurisdiction of some grass-roots people's courts shall be handed over to other grass-roots people's courts for centralized jurisdiction throughout the country in a manner uniformly designated by the people's courts at higher levels. In order to make up for the deficiency of centralized jurisdiction system, the establishment of cross-regional centralized jurisdiction courts is included in the newly revised Administrative procedure Law. The Party Central Committee, the State Council and the Supreme people's Court have adopted a series of reforms to safeguard the fundamental interests of the people and the fairness and justice of the judiciary. Starting from the case, this paper expounds the exploration background of the centralized jurisdiction system of administrative litigation through the first case of centralized jurisdiction system of administrative litigation. Through the analysis of its concept, characteristics, classification and the reasons for its implementation, this paper explains the positive significance and existing problems of centralized jurisdiction in administrative litigation. The fifth chapter systematically expounds the future development direction of administrative litigation centralized jurisdiction system is the establishment of special administrative courts.
【学位授予单位】：南昌大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.3

【参考文献】