论民行刑交叉条件下的不动产善意取得

发布时间：2018-11-18 13:59

【摘要】：当前司法实践中有类不动产案件特别突出,即无处分权人骗取或盗窃房产证、身份证等登记材料将原权利人的房屋为第三人办理登记。该类案件既涉及无处分权人的刑事犯罪,又涉及对不动产登记机构具体行政行为合法性的审查,还涉及对第三人是否构成善意取得的民事裁量,属于民事、行政、刑事三重性质交叉案件。民事诉讼判决结果、行政诉讼判决结果、刑事诉讼对合同效力、赃物的处理都对该类案件第三人能否善意取得不动产物权产生影响。目前,相关法律和司法解释尚不健全、明确,该类不动产案件第三人善意取得问题成为困扰当前司法审判的一大难题。文章以层层梳理的方式对存在的问题予以解决。首先,梳理行政因素的影响,其次,梳理刑事因素的影响,最后,将该类案件第三人善意取得回归到民法层面上来进行认定。实体上,在行政诉讼中对不动产登记机构审查性质进行界定,规范作出三种判决;在刑事诉讼中对涉案合同效力,赃物进行正确处理;在民事诉讼中对无权处分、合同效力、第三人善意等进行正确认定。程序上,针对该类案件民行刑三种程序审理先后的混乱以及由此造成矛盾判决的现状,提出“三审合一”的审理模式。
[Abstract]:In the current judicial practice, some kinds of real estate cases are particularly prominent, that is, there is no place to defraud or steal property certificates, identity cards and other registration materials will be the original owner of the house for the third party to register. This kind of case involves not only the criminal offence of the person with nowhere separation of powers, but also the examination of the legality of the specific administrative act of the real estate registration agency, and the civil discretion of whether the third party constitutes the acquisition in good faith, which belongs to civil, administrative, or not. Criminal cases of triple nature. The result of civil litigation, the result of administrative litigation, the effect of criminal proceedings on the contract and the handling of stolen goods have an influence on whether the third party in this kind of case can acquire real property right in good faith. At present, the relevant laws and judicial explanations are not perfect. It is clear that the acquisition of the third party in this kind of real estate cases in good faith has become a major problem puzzling the current judicial trial. In this paper, the existing problems are solved in a layer by layer way. Firstly, combing the influence of administrative factors, secondly, combing the influence of criminal factors, finally, the third party in this kind of cases is returned to the level of civil law. In the entity, the nature of the examination of the real estate registration agency is defined in the administrative proceedings, and three kinds of judgments are standardized, and the validity of the contract involved in the case and the handling of the stolen goods are correctly handled in the criminal proceedings. In civil proceedings, the unauthorized disposition, the validity of the contract, the third party bona fide and so on correctly identified. In order to deal with the confusion of three kinds of procedure of execution and the current situation of contradictory judgment, this paper puts forward the trial mode of "three trials in one".
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D923.2

【相似文献】