公安视角下逮捕后羁押必要性审查制度研究

发布时间：2018-11-19 18:29

【摘要】：新刑事诉讼法第93条创设了犯罪嫌疑人、被告人被逮捕后人民检察院仍应当对羁押的必要性进行审查的制度,旨在防止超期羁押和不必要的关押。作为一种实践时间不长的新制度,该制度存在诸多问题,如思想上对于审判前的羁押长期漠视、审查主体案件信息来源渠道窄、启动途径少、审查方式偏向行政化、标准不够科学、职责责任规定过于宽松、时效性差、权利救济途径缺乏、程序流程不稳定、未成年人特殊保护不到位、受害人司法救助不健全、审查建议没有强制执行力等,制约了制度效能发挥。为克服这些弊端,应当采取如下针对性的措施:建立现代的逮捕与羁押适度相分离的机制;确立以案管中心为主、监所、侦监、公诉辅助联动及侦查部门、法院协作配合的“一主三辅二配合型”的审查主体模式;继续做好依申请启动审查,丰富依建议启动审查的内容,全力推进持续的、有节点的依职权继续审查机制;引入类似抗辩式司法审查的听证式审查方式;建立分阶段审查的内容范围和评价标准;扩大实质审查的范围,建立受理登记制,缩短审查及执行期限;无救济无权利,增加当事人不服审查决定的复查复议程序;对未成年人审查建立以继续羁押为例外、以建议释放或者变更强制措施为原则;发挥司法救助在审查中抚慰受害人、修复紧张敌对关系的积极作用;设置有针对性的监督措施,扩大脱逃罪的范围,引入保证金担保制度,设立附条件中止羁押制度;整合逮捕后申请变更强制措施与进行羁押必要性审查,增强审查后建议的执行力等。
[Abstract]:Article 93 of the new Code of Criminal procedure creates a system of examination of the necessity of detention by the people's Procuratorate after the accused has been arrested in order to prevent prolonged and unnecessary detention. As a new system with little time in practice, there are many problems in this system, such as long-term disregard for pre-trial detention, narrow channels of information sources, less ways of starting up, and the way of examination being more administrative The standard is not scientific enough, the duty responsibility regulation is too loose, the timeliness is poor, the right relief way is lacking, the procedure flow is not stable, the minor special protection is not in place, the victim's judicial aid is not perfect, the examination proposal has no enforcement power, etc. It restricts the exertion of system efficiency. In order to overcome these shortcomings, we should take the following targeted measures: establish a modern mechanism of moderate separation between arrest and detention; To establish the main model of "one principal, three auxiliary and two cooperation" with the cooperation of case management center, prison, investigation and supervision, public prosecution auxiliary linkage and investigation department, and the court; Continue to do a good job according to the application to start the review, enrich according to the recommendations of the start of the content of the review, to promote the continuous, there are nodes to continue the review mechanism, introducing similar defense type of judicial review of the hearing type of review; To establish the content scope and evaluation standard of the phased review; to expand the scope of substantive examination, to establish the system of accepting registration, to shorten the period of examination and execution; to increase the procedure of reexamination and reconsideration of the parties who do not accept the decision of examination; On the basis of the principle of proposing to release or change coercive measures, judicial aid should be used to soothe the victims and repair the tense and hostile relations. Set up targeted supervision measures, expand the scope of escape crime, introduce the system of margin guarantee, set up the system of conditional suspension of custody; After arrest, we should apply for the change of coercive measures and review the necessity of custody, and enhance the implementation of the recommendations after the review.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D925.2

【参考文献】