柏拉图与亚里士多德的政治哲学思想比较
[Abstract]:The culture, thought and philosophy of ancient Greece have left everlasting achievements in the long history of mankind. In this period, the ancient Greek philosophy also got a lot of development, from ancient times to now has left the future generations a particularly precious wealth, at the same time in the history of philosophy has emerged many famous philosophers, These philosophers put forward a lot of abyss of philosophy, and these ideas condensed into ancient Greek philosophy. Plato and Aristotle are two of the philosophers whose philosophical ideas are still worth learning and learning from later generations. " The "three sages of Greece" refers to Plato, Aristotle and Socrates, and Plato and Aristotle's vast and meticulous philosophical system, political philosophy is undoubtedly the most outstanding part of his philosophy. It is not only to explore the polis politics of ancient Greece, but also to find the most frank and organized historical records. What is more, their political philosophy has given us a profound theoretical reference for our present cultural course. Some of their questions are still the focus of our reflection. The author has learned that Plato's love of philosophy is as much as his love of the country. Throughout his life he has tried to combine philosophical views with political ideas. His greatest expectation is that philosophers can be politicians. Politicians can also be philosophers. Aristotle, as a student of Plato, also put forward different philosophic ideas in inheriting Plato's philosophy, but all of them had a direct influence on the development, trend and extension of political philosophy at that time and in the future. So much so that today, in the face of the crisis of the times, future generations still have to look back and look at the quintessence of their political philosophy, and they have to say, Plato and Aristotle's political philosophy have always been worthy of reference in our study, life and work. Their political philosophy thought is completely different, Plato envelope mysterious absolute concept, the cause of the country is the absolute division of labor, by the philosophy of the implementation of the rule of man to establish "sage politics", opposed to democracy and the establishment of a hierarchical idealism, Implementing the principle of communist marriage and common children, while Aristotle advocated the doctrine of the mean, the cause of the state was "the formation of nature", the middle class carried out the rule of law to establish the "republic", and advocated the rule of law to establish the loose and free good government. The principle of preserving the family and exercising private ownership. In this paper, the author tries to carve out and analyze their political philosophy thoughts, and then compares their main political philosophy thoughts. Thus further elaborated the two political philosophy thought to the modern western political philosophy influence. This paper is divided into five chapters. The first chapter briefly explains the purpose and significance of this thesis, the research status and the structure of the thesis arrangement. The second chapter introduces Plato and Aristotle's life and political philosophy. The third chapter compares their political philosophy thoughts from five aspects. The fourth chapter is the influence of their political philosophy on modern western political philosophy. The fifth chapter combs and summarizes the research conclusion.
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D0
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王丽霞;;解读柏拉图的和谐思想[J];传承;2008年04期
2 陈善;;柏拉图理想国之考察[J];法制与社会;2009年06期
3 陈云霞;;柏拉图的和谐思想及其现代启示[J];长春工业大学学报(社会科学版);2009年01期
4 陈德玺;;贫困时代哲学家何为——以柏拉图的“洞穴”喻为例[J];理论界;2009年12期
5 陈文庆;;终极实在和城邦政治——兼论哲学和政治在柏拉图思想中的原初关联[J];国际关系学院学报;2011年02期
6 刘翠翠;;柏拉图哲学家统治思想解析[J];法制与社会;2011年13期
7 朱杨芳;;论柏拉图正义论中的“身”之“患”[J];学理论;2012年20期
8 麻海山;关于柏拉图“理念”的哲学思考[J];内蒙古统战理论研究;1999年S3期
9 王根磊;;从柏拉图的“洞穴比喻”来浅谈灵魂转向[J];思想战线;2013年S2期
10 殷旭辉;;柏拉图的正义观[J];黑龙江生态工程职业学院学报;2006年03期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 肖草;;早期欧陆哲学视域下的神正论:从柏拉图到康德[A];基督教思想评论第二辑[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 张伟珍;完整权威的柏拉图著作[N];人民日报;2003年
2 贾玉峰;西方文化的哲学基础[N];陕西日报;2002年
3 张巍;柏拉图为何写作对话录[N];文汇报;2011年
4 陆扬 复旦大学中文系;柏拉图笔下的狄奥提玛[N];中国社会科学报;2011年
5 厦门大学哲学系、知识论与认知科学研究中心 陈嘉明;“一”与“多”[N];中国社会科学报;2014年
6 林圭文;梅花雪中开 傲霜散清香[N];人民日报海外版;2003年
相关博士学位论文 前6条
1 胡孝根;柏拉图对话文体与思想创制之关系[D];浙江大学;2009年
2 吴新民;柏拉图的惩罚理论[D];浙江大学;2007年
3 姚振强;柏拉图—斯宾诺莎哲学中的理性与生存[D];浙江大学;2004年
4 申林;柏拉图的正义理论[D];中共中央党校;2008年
5 宋继杰;柏拉图《蒂迈欧篇》的宇宙论[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2001年
6 赵广明;理念与上帝[D];中国社会科学院研究生院;2001年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 郭嘉;试辩“柏拉图非诗”[D];华中科技大学;2007年
2 刘余;柏拉图著作中的数学[D];辽宁师范大学;2009年
3 田晓瑜;柏拉图摹仿说的现代阐释[D];牡丹江师范学院;2011年
4 贾海滨;柏拉图正义与法治关系思想探析[D];河北师范大学;2015年
5 马圆;柏拉图关于知识定义的论证——《泰阿泰德篇》的文本解析[D];中央民族大学;2015年
6 姜维端;柏拉图在《智者篇》中对巴门尼德存在论的批判与发展[D];复旦大学;2014年
7 王嘉麟;《理想国》中的公民教育思想研究[D];吉林大学;2016年
8 王守印;《大希庇亚篇》“美”的辨惑[D];华东师范大学;2016年
9 厉国振;柏拉图是如何理解正义的[D];上海师范大学;2016年
10 冯沫力;柏拉图正义理论研究[D];西南大学;2016年
,本文编号:2377975
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/shuoshibiyelunwen/2377975.html