我国轻微刑事案件速裁程序探究

发布时间：2019-07-08 18:03

【摘要】：2014年6月,轻微刑事案件速裁程序在我国正式进入试点。速裁程序的适用可以提高我国的司法效率,节约司法资源,解决案多人少的矛盾,并有利于对被追诉人权益的保障。本文以试点过程中的真实案件信息和办理流程为依据,通过考察国外的相关程序规定以及对我国速裁程序实践状况各方面的客观分析,发现我国速裁程序在制度规定和实践应用中的许多不合理不科学之处,并说明其背后的原因,最后对程序的改进和完善提出自己的建议,希望能对我国速裁程序的正式立法化构建有所帮助。具体来说,本文主要分为五部分的内容:引言部分首先介绍了刑事速裁制度的起源、发展和对程序的调研经过。笔者先结合在人民检察院实习的经历,后到刑事速裁制度首批试点的J市Z区人民法院和通过网络等途径收集了共120份真实的速裁案件材料。第一部分为我国轻微刑事案件速裁程序概述。本部分主要在理论上明确了我国速裁程序的概念、试点规则、建构意义及与简易程序的异同,并简要介评了部分国外相关轻罪程序,认为速裁程序在保证案件质量的前提下,应首要关注提高办案速度,以达到司法效率与公正的最优平衡。这是下文进行实践性研究的理论性基础。第二部分是我国速裁程序的运行现状及存在问题。笔者通过收集真实的速裁程序卷宗材料和总结自己参与办理速裁案件的经验体会,发现我国试点的刑事速裁程序适用过程中存在对被追诉人、被害人权力保障力度不够、律师援助流于形式、适用范围、简化方式较为单一、速裁程序办案用时依旧较长等问题。第三部分为我国速裁程序现存问题的原因分析。刑事速裁程序试点运行过程存在不足的原因主要表现为制度设计方面、司法操作层面和人为理念、法律文化背景四个方面的因素。第四部分是对我国速裁程序完善的建议。针对我国速裁程序试点中出现的问题及原因,建议在现行试点规则的基础上,完善我国的刑事速裁程序采取增加启动方式、扩大适用范围、丰富速裁程序的形式、统一速裁程序的尺度、建立权利保障和救济措施等多种方式。
[Abstract]:In June 2014, the procedure of quick adjudication of minor criminal cases officially entered the pilot in our country. The application of quick adjudication procedure can improve the judicial efficiency of our country, save judicial resources, solve the contradiction of more cases and fewer people, and is beneficial to the protection of the rights and interests of the accused. Based on the real case information and handling process in the pilot process, through the investigation of the relevant procedural provisions abroad and the objective analysis of the practical situation of the express procedure in our country, this paper finds that there are many unreasonable and unscientific aspects in the system regulation and practical application of the express procedure in our country, explains the reasons behind it, and finally puts forward some suggestions for the improvement and perfection of the procedure. It is hoped that it can be helpful to the formal legislative construction of the speed-cutting procedure in our country. Specifically, this paper is divided into five parts: the introduction first introduces the origin, development and investigation of the procedure. Based on the experience of internship in the people's Procuratorate, the author collected a total of 120 real cases through the network and then to the Z District people's Court of J City, which was the first pilot of the criminal quick adjudication system. The first part is an overview of the procedure for the speedy adjudication of minor criminal cases in our country. This part mainly clarifies the concept, pilot rules, construction significance and similarities and differences with summary procedure in theory, and briefly comments on some foreign misdemeanour procedures, and holds that the quick adjudication procedure should pay more attention to improving the speed of handling cases under the premise of ensuring the quality of cases, so as to achieve the optimal balance between judicial efficiency and justice. This is the theoretical basis of practical research below. The second part is the operation status and existing problems of speed cutting program in our country. By collecting the real file materials of the speed cutting procedure and summing up the experience of participating in the handling of the case, the author finds that there are some problems in the application process of the trial criminal procedure in our country, such as the accused person, the victim power protection is not enough, the lawyer assistance is in the form, the scope of application, the simplification way is relatively single, the speed adjudication procedure is still used for a long time, and so on. The third part is the analysis of the reasons for the existing problems of the speed cutting procedure in our country. The main reasons for the deficiency of the pilot operation process of the criminal quick adjudication procedure are as follows: the system design, the judicial operation level and the human idea, and the legal and cultural background. The fourth part is the suggestion of perfecting the speed cutting procedure in our country. In view of the problems and causes in the pilot of the speed cutting procedure in our country, it is suggested that on the basis of the current pilot rules, the criminal speed cutting procedure in our country should be perfected by increasing the starting mode, expanding the scope of application, enriching the form of the speed cutting procedure, unifying the scale of the speed cutting procedure, and establishing the protection of rights and relief measures.
【学位授予单位】：山东政法学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2016
【分类号】：D925.2

【相似文献】