中华民族共同体认同建设研究

发布时间：2018-08-06 14:27

【摘要】：中华民族共同体认同建设关系到中华民族的伟大复兴,关系到国际竞争以及每个公民对美好生活的追求。在全球化潮流中,多股巨浪常常置于西方语境下,程度不同地忽视乃至弱化了国家认同的问题。因此,加强中华民族共同体认同建设研究具有重要的现实意义。国家认同是政治认同,民族认同是文化认同。国家认同与民族认同的关系实质是一体与多元的关系,一体包含多元,多元组成一体,一体离不开多元,多元也离不开一体,一体是主线和方向,多元是要素和动力。两者辩证统一,不可偏废,但如同一体置于多元之上一样,国家认同也必须置于民族认同之上,否则就是本末倒置。文化认同是更基础、更广泛、更深厚的文化自信的源泉,是整合民族认同与国家认同冲突的关键和根本,因而文化认同是调处民族认同与国家认同关系的润滑剂。第一章通过拉萨3 · 14、乌鲁木齐7 · 5和锡盟5 · 11和5 · 17事件的深入剖析,说明部分地区存在着国家认同与民族认同失衡的风险,这种认同间的失谐的潜在可能性,既影响中国崛起,又影响中华民族伟大复兴,中华民族共同体认同建设因此成为亟待解决的重大课题。第二章,从共生和交融两大理论视角构建了中华民族共同体认同的理论基础。通过对区域主义研究经典范式的深入比较和梳理,本文建构了认同的族际共生观。这种族际共生观以区域主义为基本框架,以主体间性哲学为指导,强调族际之间的共生共促。从长远目标来看,以区域主义为基础的族际共生观强调民族共生中融合。这种融合要以马克思主义民族融合思想和中华民族多元一体格局理论为指导,在共生与交融中进一步提升认同。第三章以史为鉴,从历史路径中探寻中华共同体与人类命运共同体的交汇点。研究表明,中国共产党的民族政策重心由少数民族认同转向中华民族共同体认同,正是中华传统"天下主义"文化智慧的集中体现。建设中华民族共同体的共有精神家园,标志着国家的民族政策迈入新时代。第四章以典型个案为基础,总结边疆少数民族地区助力中华民族共同体认同提升的成功经验。这些经验基于文化认同的双向互动,凝练出的内蒙古案例显示,汉文化不等于中华文化,昭君文化、草原文化也不外化于中国,内蒙古是多元一体"谁也离不开谁"文化交融典范。第五章以国际经验为鉴,通过总结美国、俄罗斯(苏联)、欧盟等共同体认同的成败得失,揭示出政治制度特有的路径依赖。文化多样性源于路径依赖的多样性,因此经验教训可以借鉴,但不能因此而对不同语境下的制度选择进行倾向性评价。第六章集中探讨中华民族共同体认同提升的路径选择。力图通过强化物质、制度和精神三个层面进行探索,形成三个层面的认同建设同向发力、合和而为,共筑互嵌式社会结构和社区环境,进一步提升中华民族共同体认同。结语部分对认同整合的基本维度及其核心关系进行了提炼总结。
[Abstract]:The construction of the identity of the Chinese community is related to the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation, the international competition and the pursuit of a better life by every citizen. In the trend of globalization, many huge waves are often placed in the western context, ignoring and weakening the national identity to a different degree. Therefore, the establishment of the identity of the Chinese community is to be strengthened. The research has important practical significance. The national identity is political identity and national identity is cultural identity. The relationship between national identity and national identity is essentially a one and multiple relationship, which includes pluralism and pluralism, one is inseparable from pluralism, pluralism is inseparable from one body, one is the main line and direction, and pluralism is element and motive. The dialectical unity of the two is not to be abandoned, but as one is above the pluralism, the national identity must be placed above the national identity. Otherwise, the cultural identity is the foundation, the broader and the deeper cultural confidence, which is the key and the basis for the integration of the conflict between national identity and national identity, and therefore the cultural identity is the tune. The first chapter, through a thorough analysis of the events of Lhasa 3, 14, Urumqi 7 5 and Xion 5, 11 and 5. 17, shows that there is a risk of unbalance between national identity and national identity in some areas, and the potential of disharmony between this identity affects the rise of China and the Chinese people. In the second chapter, the theoretical basis of the identity of the Chinese community is constructed from the two theoretical perspectives of symbiosis and blending. Through the in-depth comparison and combing of the classic paradigms of regionalism, this article constructs the identity of the ethnic symbiosis. The concept of international symbiosis is based on regionalism as the basic framework, with the guidance of inter subjectivity philosophy, emphasizing the symbiosis among ethnic groups. In the long run, the ethnic symbiosis based on regionalism emphasizes the integration of ethnic symbiosis. This integration should be based on the theory of Marx's national integration and the theory of Chinese ethnic diversity. The third chapter explores the intersection point of the Chinese community and the human destiny community from the historical path. The study shows that the center of national policy of the Communist Party of China has turned from ethnic minority identity to the identity of the Chinese community, which is the collection of the Chinese traditional "world doctrine" cultural wisdom. The building of a common spiritual home of the Chinese community marks a new era of national national policy. The fourth chapter, based on a typical case, summarizes the successful experience of promoting the identity of the Chinese community in the minority areas of the border areas. These experiences are based on the two-way interaction between the cultural identity and the Inner Mongolia case. The Chinese culture is not equal to the Chinese culture, and the Zhaojun culture and the prairie culture are also inseparable from China. The Inner Mongolia is a pluralistic integration of "who can't live without" the model of cultural blending. The fifth chapter, with the experience of the United States, Russia (Soviet Union) and the European Union, reveals the unique path dependence of the political system. Cultural diversity is derived from the diversity of path dependence, so lessons can be learned from the lessons, but we can not make a tendency to evaluate the choice of institutions in different contexts. The sixth chapter focuses on the path choice of the promotion of the identity of the Chinese community. It tries to explore three aspects by strengthening the three levels of material, system and spirit. In the conclusion, the basic dimension and its core relationship of identity integration are summarized.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D633

【相似文献】