后冷战时代斯堪的纳维亚地区的俄苏研究
发布时间：2018-12-15 23:33
【摘要】：斯堪的纳维亚地区地处欧洲北端,与俄罗斯隔海相望。虽然在俄苏研究领域没有美国和英国那样声名显赫,但是独特的地理位置,与俄罗斯长达一千多年的悠久历史联系,孕育出本地区相对独特的俄苏研究群体和学术思想。冷战后,与美国、英国等西方主要国家的俄苏研究范式转型相似,斯堪的纳维亚地区的俄苏研究在传统区域国别研究的基础上更加重视学科理论的应用。面对苏联解体后,俄罗斯转型所带来的学术研究机遇和潜在的经济机会,斯堪的纳维亚国家1990年代在俄苏研究领域的投入不断增加,本地区俄苏研究的机构和研究人员都出现了一定程度的增长。在此基础上,斯堪的纳维亚地区冷战后的俄苏研究取得了一系列成果,其国际知名度和影响力也有了相应的提升,从而引起了中国学界的关注。本文主要研究的是斯堪的纳维亚地区学术界在冷战后对苏联和俄罗斯问题研究的发展状况,是国际问题研究框架下,国别问题研究与国内政治经济进程研究的综合。鉴于苏联解体后,西方转型学理论对于俄罗斯的解释力不足,需要将传统的区域、国别研究与国内进程的深度阐述相结合。因而,一方面,本文通过对斯堪的纳维亚地区俄苏研究领域的学术发展面貌进行概括,厘清这一特定地区俄苏研究的特点,从而观察该地区学术研究如何与决策互动,从而影响地区政治；另一方面,这又是一个国际政治的命题,主要是观察俄罗斯本身政治、经济的发展与变化,如何成为该地区学术的“镜像认知”。为何同样的俄罗斯现象会在不同地区的学术认知中出现不同的分析与解释?这一双向互动本身已经成为当代国际政治经济一个不可忽视的内容。简单地说,学术认知已经成为国际政治的重要工具。在整体结构上,本文共分为三个主要组成部分,共10章节内容。首先,对斯堪的纳维亚地区俄苏研究的历史发展进行梳理,对当前研究状况进行总结,并初步提出本地区俄苏研究的特点；随后进入本文的重点研究内容——对本地区代表性学者的学术思想进行系统性的解读和分析,从学术史的分析中汲取尽可能多的营养;最后,对本地区俄苏研究的独特性、面临的挑战进行概括。第一组成部分绪论与第一章。在阐述本研究的源起,在理论、实践和学术交流方面的意义,国内外研究现状,基本框架和主要研究内容,研究方法,以及创新和不足之处。第一章——斯堪的纳维亚地区俄苏研究概述。由历史发展脉络、当前研究状况以及研究特点的初步总结构成。在历史发展脉络部分,回顾了本地区俄苏研究的发展历程、动因和主要特点。在当代研究状况部分主要总结了冷战后本地区俄苏研究在机构、人员方面的增长状况,和研究议题的变化。初步认为本地区俄苏研究具有如下特点：研究议题集中于中观层面,具有一定程度的分散性特征,注重跨学科研究。第二组成部分,第二章至第八章,对于斯堪的纳维亚地区俄苏研究学界代表性学者的学术思想进行针对性的个案分析。从代表性学者的所属学科和研究领域出发,划分为三项主题。第一主题,冷战后斯堪的纳维亚地区的俄罗斯转型研究,包括瑞典学者奥斯隆德从新自由主义视角下对俄罗斯资本主义革命的研究,瑞典学者赫德兰在新制度主义背景下对俄罗斯转型的研究,丹麦学者诺格德在比较政治、经济学框架下下对原苏东国家的转型研究。第二主题,冷战后斯堪的纳维亚地区的俄罗斯历史研究,包括芬兰学者苏特拉从经济思想史角度对苏联经济思想演进的研究,丹麦学者罗森菲尔特从政治制度史角度对斯大林信息控制体系的历史研究。第三主题,冷战后斯堪的纳维亚地区的俄罗斯外交研究,包括挪威学者诺依曼基于治理模式认同视角对俄罗斯与国际社会(欧洲)关系的研究,瑞典学者琼森从政策分析角度对俄罗斯1991年至20世纪初零和观念下中亚政策的研究。之所以选择这两位学者,主要是考虑到其研究对象在俄罗斯外交战略中的重要性。欧洲不仅在历史上一直是俄罗斯的主要交往对象和西方化思想的来源,更是俄罗斯在转型进程中的重要合作伙伴。中亚对于俄罗斯来说更像是“兄弟”,它们不仅有着深厚的历史联系,从现实方面来看,中亚地区是俄罗斯在后苏联时代以及后苏联空间中,重要的战略支点。第三组成部分,结论—一相对均衡、务实、兼容发展的斯堪的纳维亚地区俄苏研究。基于对斯堪的纳维亚地区俄苏研究历史发展脉络,冷战后研究现状和代表性学者学术思想的分析和了解,就冷战后本地区的俄苏研究就行综合性评价。相对于文化同源的美国和英国,斯堪的纳维亚地区因为独特的地理位置、历史文化传统和利益诉求,在俄苏研究的立场方面力求均衡；以政策需要为研究导向,讲求务实性；在研究议题、研究途径、研究方法、研究框架等方面表现出兼容并包的特征。
[Abstract]:Scandinavia is located at the north end of Europe and is looking at Russia. Although the Russian-Soviet research field is not as well-known as the United States and the United Kingdom, the unique geographical location, with the long history of Russia for more than a thousand years, is a relatively unique Russian-Soviet research group and academic thought in the region. After the cold war, with the transformation of the Russian-Soviet research paradigm of the major western countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, the Russian-Soviet research in the Scandinavia region has given more attention to the application of the subject theory on the basis of the traditional regional studies. In the face of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the academic research opportunities and potential economic opportunities brought by the transformation of Russia, the input of Scandinavian countries in the field of Soviet research in the 1990s has increased, and both the institutions and researchers of the Russian-Soviet research in the region have witnessed a certain degree of growth. On the basis of this, the Russian-Soviet research after the cold war in Scandinavia has made a series of achievements, and its international popularity and influence have also improved correspondingly, thus causing the attention of the Chinese academic circle. The main research of this paper is the development of the research of the Soviet Union and Russia after the cold war, which is the synthesis of the research of the country problem and the research of the political and economic process of the country under the framework of the international problem. In the light of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the western theory of transformation is not enough to explain the Russian interpretation, and it is necessary to combine the traditional region, the country study and the depth of the domestic process. On the one hand, on the one hand, by summarizing the academic development of the Russian-Soviet research field in Scandinavia, this paper makes a clear study of the characteristics of the Russian-Soviet research in this particular region, thus observing how to interact with the decision-making in the region, thus affecting the regional politics; on the other hand, This is another proposition of international politics, mainly to observe the development and change of Russia's own politics and economy, and how to become the academic 鈥渋mage cognition鈥，
本文编号：2381468
[Abstract]:Scandinavia is located at the north end of Europe and is looking at Russia. Although the Russian-Soviet research field is not as well-known as the United States and the United Kingdom, the unique geographical location, with the long history of Russia for more than a thousand years, is a relatively unique Russian-Soviet research group and academic thought in the region. After the cold war, with the transformation of the Russian-Soviet research paradigm of the major western countries, such as the United States and the United Kingdom, the Russian-Soviet research in the Scandinavia region has given more attention to the application of the subject theory on the basis of the traditional regional studies. In the face of the disintegration of the Soviet Union, the academic research opportunities and potential economic opportunities brought by the transformation of Russia, the input of Scandinavian countries in the field of Soviet research in the 1990s has increased, and both the institutions and researchers of the Russian-Soviet research in the region have witnessed a certain degree of growth. On the basis of this, the Russian-Soviet research after the cold war in Scandinavia has made a series of achievements, and its international popularity and influence have also improved correspondingly, thus causing the attention of the Chinese academic circle. The main research of this paper is the development of the research of the Soviet Union and Russia after the cold war, which is the synthesis of the research of the country problem and the research of the political and economic process of the country under the framework of the international problem. In the light of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the western theory of transformation is not enough to explain the Russian interpretation, and it is necessary to combine the traditional region, the country study and the depth of the domestic process. On the one hand, on the one hand, by summarizing the academic development of the Russian-Soviet research field in Scandinavia, this paper makes a clear study of the characteristics of the Russian-Soviet research in this particular region, thus observing how to interact with the decision-making in the region, thus affecting the regional politics; on the other hand, This is another proposition of international politics, mainly to observe the development and change of Russia's own politics and economy, and how to become the academic 鈥渋mage cognition鈥，
本文编号：2381468
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/sklbs/2381468.html
