基于IFC的BIM模型与绿色建筑分析软件互操作性研究

发布时间：2018-05-11 01:07

本文选题：建筑信息模型(BIM) + 工业基础类标准(Industry　；参考：《郑州大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：随着社会经济的不断发展,我国房屋建筑业年规模接近10万亿,近几年每年竣工面积40多亿平方米,建筑行业属于高耗能行业,建筑节能形势严峻。无论是国家层面还是个人角度,都对能源消耗和环境舒适性给予越来越多的关注,建筑节能和绿色建筑成为建筑业可持续发展的重要措施。建筑信息模型是参数化的数字模型,能够存储建筑全生命周期的数据信息,应用范围涵盖了整个AEC行业。BIM(Building Information Modeling)技术大大提高了建筑节能设计的工作效率和准确性,一定程度上减少了重复工作,使得工程信息共享性显著提高。但是,相关BIM软件间互操作性较差,不同软件采用不同的数据存储标准,在互操作时信息丢失严重,形成信息孤岛。建立开放统一的建筑信息模型数据标准是解决信息共享中“信息孤岛”问题的有效途径。本文研究基于IFC(Industry Foundation Classes)标准的建筑信息模型与绿色建筑分析软件的互操作性。首先,对BIM技术的发展概况及在绿色建筑分析方面的应用进行阐述,解读常见的绿色建筑评价标准,比较我国传统建筑绿色性能分析方法与基于BIM技术分析方法的区别,依据相关评价标准建立分析结果准确性评价标准。其次,对IFC、gb XML标准的发展和标准中对建筑信息的表示方法做详细说明,比较两种标准的不同和各自的特点,总结标准存在的问题。再次,基于IFC格式文件测评BIM建模软件之间、BIM模型与绿色建筑分析软件Ecotect间互操作性,分析IFC、gbXML文件本身包含的实体种类和互操作过程中信息丢失的种类和原因,针对问题提出可操作性改进方法。最后,通过工程实例验证改进方法,总结通过互操作能够完成绿色建筑分析的哪些分析项目。研究成果方面,分析了IFC文件及应用方法,测评了BIM工具间的互操作性,明确了基于IFC、gbXML的互操作能够进行分析的项目和不能分析的原因,为进一步提高BIM工具间互操作性研究提供参考。
[Abstract]:With the development of social economy, the annual scale of housing construction in our country is close to 10 trillion, and the completed area is more than 4 billion square meters each year in recent years. The construction industry belongs to the high energy consuming industry, and the situation of building energy saving is severe. Energy consumption and environmental comfort are paid more and more attention from both national and individual perspectives. Energy saving and green building become important measures for sustainable development of construction industry. The building information model is a parameterized digital model, which can store the data information of the whole life cycle of the building. The application scope covers the whole AEC industry. The technology of building Information modeling greatly improves the efficiency and accuracy of the building energy saving design. To a certain extent, the duplication of work is reduced, and the sharing of engineering information is improved significantly. However, the interoperability of related BIM software is poor, different software adopt different data storage standards, information loss is serious in the process of interoperation, and information island is formed. Establishing an open and unified data standard for building information model is an effective way to solve the problem of "information isolated island" in information sharing. This paper studies the interoperability of building information model based on IFC(Industry Foundation Classes and green building analysis software. First of all, the development of BIM technology and its application in green building analysis are expounded, the common evaluation standards of green building are interpreted, and the differences between the traditional green performance analysis method and the analysis method based on BIM technology in China are compared. According to the relevant evaluation criteria, the accuracy evaluation criteria of the analysis results are established. Secondly, the development of IFC GB XML standard and the representation method of building information in the standard are explained in detail, the differences and characteristics of the two standards are compared, and the problems existing in the standard are summarized. Thirdly, based on the IFC format file, the interoperability between BIM modeling software and green building analysis software Ecotect is evaluated, and the types of entities and the types and causes of information loss in the process of interoperability are analyzed. The maneuverability improvement method is put forward to solve the problem. Finally, the improved method is verified by engineering examples, which analysis items can be completed by interoperation are summarized. In the aspect of research results, the paper analyzes the IFC file and its application methods, evaluates the interoperability among BIM tools, and clarifies the items that can be analyzed and the reasons why the interoperability based on IFC / GB XML can be analyzed. It provides a reference for further improving the interoperability of BIM tools.
【学位授予单位】：郑州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：TU201.5;TU17

【相似文献】