当前位置:主页 > 硕博论文 > 农业硕士论文 >

复合酶制剂的体外筛选及其在蛋鸡低能日粮中的应用

发布时间:2018-05-19 11:09

  本文选题:酶制剂 + 配方筛选 ; 参考:《沈阳农业大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:本试验通过体外消化试验筛选出纤维素酶、木聚糖酶和葡萄糖氧化酶的最适配方,将筛选出的复合酶制剂配方应用在蛋鸡低能日粮中,研究复合酶制剂对蛋鸡生产性能,蛋品质、养分代谢率和血液指标的影响。试验结果如下:试验一:复合酶配方的体外筛选1.本试验采用国标方法对3种酶的活性进行测定,3种酶活性测定值为:木聚糖酶46863.47u/g,纤维素酶 8452.61u/g,葡萄糖氧化酶 1000.00u/g。2.本试验采用3×3完全交叉设计试验,使用体外消化法模拟饲料在机体内消化情况,获得消化产物,测定干物质消化率。3种酶对干物质消化率都具有极显著作用,对干物质消化率效果最佳的单酶剂量为:木聚糖酶4500u/g、纤维素酶250u/g、葡萄糖氧化酶300u/g。综上所述,筛选的复合酶配方为:纤维素酶250u/g,木聚糖酶4500u/g,葡萄糖氧化酶300u/g。试验二:低能日粮中添加不同水平的复合酶制剂对产蛋鸡的生产性能、蛋品质、养代谢率和血液指标的影响。选择480只蛋鸡,随机分为5组,每组3个重复,每个重复32只鸡。其中正对照组饲喂普通的基础日粮,负对照组和试验组的日粮比普通的基础日粮降低能量0.21MJ/kg,使得试验组的复合酶添加量的分别为200g/t、300g/t、400g/t。通过饲养试验验证此复合酶对蛋鸡生产性能、蛋品质、养分代谢率及血液指标的影响,并判断添加的最适剂量,为复合酶在蛋鸡上的应用提供依据。1.生产性能方面:降低能量对蛋鸡的生产性能产生影响,添加复合酶制剂蛋鸡生产性能具有改善作用。负对照组的平均蛋重比正对照组降低了 1.22%(P0.05),试验1组的平均蛋重比正对照组升高了 1.38%(P0.01),比负对照组升高了 2.63%(P0.05),并且试验1组的平均蛋重也显著高于试验2组和试验3组(P0.05)。负对照组的产蛋率比正对照组降低了 10.01%(P0.01),试验2组产蛋率比正对照组降低了 3.24%(P0.05),比负对照组升高了 7.53%(P0.01)。负对照组的料蛋比比正对照组降低了 16.11%(P0.05),试验1组、试验2组、试验3组的料蛋比均低于负对照组,但是差异不显著(P0.05)。所以在蛋鸡生产性能方面,最优试验组为试验2组。2.蛋品质方面:试验1组、试验2组、试验3组与正对照组和负对照组相比,蛋壳厚度、强度、蛋重、蛋白高度、哈夫单位以及蛋黄颜色均差异不显著(P0.05)。3.养分代谢率方面:低能日粮中添加复合酶制剂具有促进干物质代谢率的作用,其中试验3组的干物质代谢率显著高于负对照组,提高了 8.76%(P0.05),并且与正对照组之间差异不显著(P0.05)。添加复合酶制剂促进了粗蛋白代谢,试验2组的粗蛋白代谢率比正对照组升高了 5.77%(P0.05),试验3组粗蛋白代谢率比正对照组升高了10.60%(P0.01),试验2组和试验3组的粗蛋白代谢率比负对照组分别升高了 6.92%(P0.05)、11.80%(P0.01)。低能日粮中添加酶制剂能促进饲料表观代谢能,其中试验1组、试验3组表观代谢能比负对照组分别升高了 8.73%、9.04%,差异显著(P0.05),但是试验1组与试验3组均极显著低于正对照组(P0.01)。因此在养分代谢率中效果较好的试验组为试验3组。4.血液指标方面:试验1组、试验3组血清白蛋白较正对照组得到极显著的升高(P0.01),并且极显著地高于负对照组(P0.01);试验2组、试验3组血清球蛋白较负对照组得到了显著地提高(P0.05),并且极显著地高于正对照组;试验1组血清中总蛋白含量较负对照组得到了显著地提高(P0.05),试验2组、试验3组血清总蛋白含量极显著地高于负对照组(P0.01),并且极显著地高于正对照组(P0.01);试验2组和试验3组血清总胆固醇含量显著高于正对照组和负对照组(P0.05);试验1组血清甘油三酯较负对照组显著性地降低(P0.05),并且极显著地低于正对照组(P0.01),试验2组、试验3组血清甘油三酯与负对照组相比,差异不显著(P0.05),但是极显著地低于正对照组(P0.01)。酶制剂对血清中钙的含量影响不大,各组之间差异不显著(P0.05),试验1组磷含量显著高于正对照组和负对照组(P0.05),试验3组磷含量极显著地高于正对照组和负对照组(P0.01)。综上所述,添加一定量的酶制剂能够弥补降低能量对蛋鸡产生的负面影响,能提高蛋鸡生产性能、提高养分代谢率,促进血液指标。整体比较来看,200g/t蛋鸡生产效果较好。
[Abstract]:In this experiment, the optimum formula of cellulase, xylanase and glucose oxidase was screened out through in vitro digestion test. The compound enzyme formulation was used in the low energy diet of laying hens, and the effects of compound enzyme preparation on the production performance, egg quality, nutrient metabolism rate and blood liquid index of laying hens were studied. The experimental results were as follows: Test 1: compound In vitro screening of enzyme formula in 1. experiments, the activity of 3 enzymes was measured by national standard method. The determination of the activity of the 3 enzymes was: xylanase 46863.47u/g, cellulase 8452.61u/g, and glucose oxidase 1000.00u/g.2. in this experiment, using 3 x 3 complete cross design test, using in vitro digestion method to simulate the digestion of feed in the body and obtain the results. The digestibility of the digestibility of dry matter has a very significant effect on the digestibility of dry matter. The optimum single enzyme dose for the digestibility of dry matter is: xylanase 4500u/g, cellulase 250u/g, and glucose oxidase 300u/g.. The selected compound enzyme is as follows: cellulase 250u/g, xylanase 4500u/g, glucose oxygen. Enzyme 300u/g. test two: the effects of different levels of compound enzymes on the production performance, egg quality, metabolism rate and blood indexes of laying hens were added to low energy diets. 480 layers were randomly divided into 5 groups, 3 repetitions in each group, and 32 chickens for each repetition. The normal control group was fed with the normal basal diet, the negative control group and the test group. The ratio of the compound enzyme added to the test group was 200g/t, 300g/t, and 400g/t., respectively, to verify the effect of the compound enzyme on the production performance, egg quality, nutrient metabolism rate and blood index, and to judge the optimum dosage of the compound enzyme, which provided the basis for the application of the compound enzyme in the laying hens. According to the production performance of.1., the production performance of laying hens was reduced by reducing energy. The average egg weight of the negative control group was 1.22% lower than that of the control group (P0.05). The average egg weight of the negative control group was 1.38% (P0.01) higher than that in the control group, and 2.63% (P0.05) was higher than that of the negative control group. The average egg weight of the 1 groups was also significantly higher than that of the test 2 and the 3 groups (P0.05). The egg production rate in the negative control group was 10.01% (P0.01) lower than that in the control group, and the rate of egg production in the 2 groups was 3.24% (P0.05) and 7.53% (P0.01) higher than that in the negative control group. The ratio of egg to eggs in the negative control group was 16.11% lower than that in the control group (P0.05). Test 1 groups, test 2 groups, 3 groups of material and egg ratio were lower than the negative control group, but the difference was not significant (P0.05). So in the production performance of the egg chicken, the optimal test group was 2 groups of egg quality: Test 1, 2 groups, 3 groups compared with the normal control group and negative control group, eggshell thickness, strength, egg weight, protein height, Hough unit And the color difference of egg yolk was not significant (P0.05).3. nutrient metabolism rate: adding compound enzyme preparation in low energy diet promoted dry matter metabolism rate, and the dry matter metabolism rate of 3 groups was significantly higher than that of negative control group, increased by 8.76% (P0.05), and there was no significant difference between the control group and the control group (P0.05). The crude protein metabolism of the 2 groups was increased by 5.77% (P0.05). The crude protein metabolism rate in the 3 groups was 10.60% higher than that in the normal control group (P0.01). The crude protein metabolism rate of the 2 groups and the 3 groups increased by 6.92% (P0.05), 11.80% (P0.01), and the enzyme preparation in the low energy diet was added. Promoting the apparent metabolic energy of feed, among the 1 groups, the apparent metabolic energy of the 3 groups was increased by 8.73% and 9.04%, respectively (P0.05), but the 1 groups and the 3 groups were significantly lower than the positive control group (P0.01). Therefore, the experimental group with better effect in the nutrient metabolism rate was the 3 groups of.4. blood indexes: the test 1, The serum albumin in the 3 groups was significantly higher than that in the positive control group (P0.01), and significantly higher than that in the negative control group (P0.01). The test 2 groups, 3 groups of serum globulin were significantly higher than the negative control group (P0.05), and significantly higher than that in the control group; the total protein content in the serum of 1 groups was significantly higher than that in the negative control group. The total serum protein content in the 3 groups was significantly higher than that of the negative control group (P0.01), and the total serum total cholesterol content in the 2 groups and the test groups was significantly higher than that of the positive control group and the negative control group (P0.05), and the serum triglyceride in the 1 groups was significantly lower than the negative control group in the test group (P0.05). (P0.05) and significantly lower than the control group (P0.01), test 2 groups, 3 groups of serum triglycerides compared with the negative control group, the difference was not significant (P0.05), but very significantly lower than the control group (P0.01). The enzyme preparation has little effect on the content of calcium in the serum, there is no significant difference between the groups (P0.05), the 1 groups of phosphorus in the test group are significantly higher than the positive pair. The content of phosphorus in the 3 groups was significantly higher than that of the control group and the negative control group (P0.01). To sum up, the addition of a certain amount of enzyme preparation could make up the negative effects of reducing energy on laying hens, and could improve the performance of the laying hens, increase the rate of nutrient metabolism, and promote the blood indexes. The overall comparison of the 200g/t laying hens was the overall comparison. The effect of production is better.
【学位授予单位】:沈阳农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S831.5

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 古金华;复合酶制剂饲喂断奶仔猪效果试验[J];养猪;2000年01期

2 刘英,刘洋;畜禽饲喂辽星牌复合酶的效果观察[J];现代畜牧兽医;2005年09期

3 蒋宗勇,陈小薇,林映才,郭吉余;溢多利复合酶饲养黄鸡效果的研究[J];中国饲料;1994年05期

4 高玉红,孙新胜,郭卫华;复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪粪便菌群的影响[J];中国饲料;2001年03期

5 厉丽华,潘云河,王柏强,余颖,项延润;饲用复合酶喂猪的效果试验[J];浙江畜牧兽医;2002年03期

6 ;天康复合酶面市[J];山东家禽;2002年08期

7 潘为忠;一种新型复合酶制剂——天康复合酶面市[J];当代畜牧;2002年07期

8 潘为忠;一种新型复合酶制剂——天康复合酶面市[J];中国禽业导刊;2002年14期

9 张涛,李小丽;添加复合酶制剂对猪生长发育的影响[J];陕西农业科学;2003年05期

10 李红玉;杨桂英;;复合酶制剂的生理功能及在动物生产中的应用[J];饲料研究;2006年06期

相关会议论文 前10条

1 管武太;刘朝亮;;复合酶制剂对仔猪血液生理生化指标的影响[A];酶制剂在饲料工业中的应用[C];2005年

2 李兆勇;吴培均;;复合酶制剂的合理选择与精细化应用[A];2010山东饲料科学技术交流大会论文集[C];2010年

3 王敏;翁晓辉;李阳源;史宝军;;饲用复合酶制剂对肉鸭生长性能的影响[A];中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第十一次全国动物营养学术研讨会论文集[C];2012年

4 吕东海;林海燕;刘亚力;王淑彩;王敏;;微丸型饲用复合酶在生长育肥猪饲料中的应用效果研究[A];中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会——第九届学术研讨会论文集[C];2004年

5 赵德英;茌亚青;任德胜;张玉红;;酶制剂饲喂产蛋期蛋鸡的效果研究[A];2009山东饲料科学技术交流大会论文集[C];2009年

6 张青青;杨在宾;杨维仁;姜淑贞;张桂国;萧贵松;;玉米-豆粕型日粮中添加耐高温复合酶制剂对肉鸡养分利用率的影响[A];2009山东饲料科学技术交流大会论文集[C];2009年

7 周华杰;;复合酶制剂在畜禽生产中的应用进展[A];2009山东饲料科学技术交流大会论文集[C];2009年

8 张海棠;王艳荣;胡庆锋;;复合酶制剂对肉鸡生产性能的影响[A];河南省畜牧兽医学会第七届理事会第二次会议暨2008年学术研讨会论文集[C];2008年

9 段磊;赵国先;任志友;苏坤;杜宗棠;计成;马秋刚;张建云;郑长山;;日粮中小麦和复合酶制剂对生长蛋鸡养分表观消化率的影响[A];第五届(2011)中国蛋鸡行业发展大会会刊[C];2011年

10 王平;;纤维素复合酶的作用及其在反刍动物生产上的应用[A];2009山东饲料科学技术交流大会论文集[C];2009年

相关重要报纸文章 前6条

1 扬州大学动物科学与技术学院 俞路 王雅倩 章世元;肉鸭添喂复合酶制剂生长快[N];江苏农业科技报;2008年

2 河北大学生命科学学院 马利;饲用复合酶在畜禽上的应用[N];河北科技报;2004年

3 康海;复合酶制剂喂雏鸡增重快[N];江苏农业科技报;2004年

4 郭凤莲 陈存社;微生物制备复合酶制剂研究进展[N];中国食品质量报;2009年

5 高岩;FE复合酶:划时代的高科技成果[N];光明日报;2000年

6 南京农业大学 周岩民;饲料企业突破困境的路径[N];中国畜牧报;2004年

相关博士学位论文 前3条

1 范成莉;β-葡聚糖、木聚糖复合酶对断奶仔猪生长轴激素的影响及其机理研究[D];浙江大学;2008年

2 汤海鸥;NSP复合酶优化及在肉鸡日粮中高剂量添加效果研究[D];中国农业科学院;2013年

3 王红梅;复合酶处理玉米秸秆对肉羊生产性能及破解纤维结构机制的研究[D];中国农业科学院;2017年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 叶超;不同蛋白水平与复合酶对0~28日龄信鸽生产性能与消化功能的影响[D];福建农林大学;2015年

2 刘慧龙;复合酶对几种饲料原料养分消化率的影响及其在猪饲料中的应用[D];沈阳农业大学;2016年

3 李奎;酶制剂在肉牛日粮中的应用效果研究[D];石河子大学;2016年

4 唐千甯;高粱饲粮中添加复合酶和益生菌对肉鸡的生长及养分消化率的影响[D];湖南农业大学;2016年

5 于翔宇;复合酶制剂的体外筛选及其在蛋鸡低能日粮中的应用[D];沈阳农业大学;2017年

6 张宝成;饲用纤维素复合酶在绵羊饲养中的作用效果及作用机理研究[D];新疆农业大学;2004年

7 武静龙;复合酶制剂对獭兔生产性能和血清生理生化指标的影响[D];湖南农业大学;2006年

8 周华杰;复合酶制剂对断奶仔猪养分利用率和生长发育影响的研究[D];山东农业大学;2010年

9 Lamine Kouta Keita;复合酶制剂对肉鸡生长性能、抗氧化、免疫及肉品质的影响[D];南京农业大学;2013年

10 隋毅;不同复合酶制剂对肉仔鸡生长性能、粪便相对黏度和菌群数量的影响[D];中国农业科学院;2012年



本文编号:1909871

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/1909871.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户e3e43***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com