近自然经营对旺业甸林场森林持水能力的影响研究
[Abstract]:In this study, Wangyedian, Karaqin Banner, Chifeng City, Northern foot of Yanshan Mountain, was used as the research site, (Pinus tabulaeformis), artificial larch forest (Larix principis-rupprechti) and natural birch forest (Betula platyphylla) were used as the research objects, and the artificial larch forest (Larix principis-rupprechti) and the natural birch forest (Betula platyphylla) of different forest ages were used in this study. The water holding capacity of litter layer and soil layer were investigated and analyzed in three forest management modes, I. e., near natural management, conventional management and unmanaged forest management, and the effects of near-natural management on the water holding capacity of soil and litter were studied. The results are as follows: (1) the reserves of three types of forest litter under near-natural management are higher than that of local conventional management, but lower than that of non-management. The reserves of litter in unmanaged, near-natural, conventional artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest were 14.37 t / hm ~ (-2) / (12.76 t / hm ~ (2) / 10.97 t / hm ~ (2) and 13.48 t / hm ~ (2) / m ~ (2) and 11.62 t / m ~ (2) / 10.36 t / hm ~ (2), respectively. The natural birch forest was 12.28 t / hm ~ 2 / hm ~ (2) / 9.68 t / hm ~ (2) / 7.86 t / hm ~ (2) respectively. (2) the effective interception of litter and the storage of litter in different forest management modes showed the same changing trend. The effective storage capacity of litter in conventional artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest is 19.54 t / hm ~ (2), 16.88 t / h ~ (-1) m ~ (2) and 13.42 t / hm ~ (2), respectively, and that in artificial larch forest is 23.54 t / hm ~ (2), 17.99 t / hm ~ (2), 14.70 t / hm ~ (2), respectively. The natural birch forest was 22.36 t / hm ~ 2 / hm ~ (2) and 16.27 t / hm ~ (2) 路hm ~ (2) / hm ~ (2) respectively. (3) the near natural management improved the pore condition of soil capillary. The soil capillary porosity of the three forest types showed the trend of unconventional management. The porosity of soil capillary of artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest is 46.14 and 39.51and 36.96respectively, and 43.81and 42.20cm of artificial larch forest, 42.20and 40.58, respectively, in the near natural management, not in operation, and in the conventional management of artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest. The natural birch stands were 43.97 and 42.06 respectively. (4) the soil water storage of different forest management modes showed the same change trend as the soil capillary porosity. The soil water storage of conventional artificial Pinus tabulaeformis forest is 1635.78 t / hm ~ (2) / hm ~ (2) 1495.48 t / hm ~ (2) ~ (-1) 57.54 t / hm ~ (2), and that of artificial larch forest is 1758.73 t / h ~ (2) / hm ~ (2) ~ (-1) 1693.64 t / hm ~ (2) / h ~ (2), 1568.84 t / hm ~ (2), respectively. The natural birch forest was 1767.91 t / hm ~ (2) / hm ~ (2) = 1687.39 t / hm ~ (2) / hm ~ (2) = 1571.39 t / hm ~ (2) respectively. (5) the water holding capacity of forest land was the best in near-natural management and the worst in conventional management. The total volume of water stored in the natural operation of the artificial larch forest and the natural birch forest is 1662.42 t / hm ~ (2) / 1789.39 t / hm ~ (2) / 1594.61 t / hm ~ (2), and is not operated as 1 526.12 t / h ~ (2) / h ~ (2) ~ 1732.35 t / hm ~ (2) / 1717.64 t / hm ~ (2). Conventional business is 1379.18 t / hm2t / hm2n 1796.98t / hm2t / hm2r 1592.90t / hm2.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S750
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 赵鸣飞;薛峰;吕烨;左婉怡;王国义;邢开雄;王宇航;康慕谊;;黄土高原森林枯落物储量、厚度分布规律及其影响因素[J];生态学报;2016年22期
2 刘宇;郭建斌;王彦辉;刘泽彬;邓秀秀;张桐;熊伟;左海军;;宁夏六盘山不同密度华北落叶松人工林枯落物水文效应[J];北京林业大学学报;2016年08期
3 郭梦娇;朱江;程小琴;韩海荣;康峰峰;董玲玲;赵金龙;宋小帅;;辽河源不同林龄油松林水源涵养能力研究[J];水土保持学报;2016年03期
4 冯秋红;刘兴良;卢昌泰;吴晓龙;潘红丽;马文宝;刘世荣;;不同经营模式对川西亚高山天然次生林林地水文效应的影响[J];生态学报;2016年17期
5 赵雨虹;范少辉;夏晨;;亚热带4种常绿阔叶林林分枯落物储量及持水功能研究[J];南京林业大学学报(自然科学版);2015年06期
6 李亚男;许雪飞;许中旗;王丽;;抚育间伐对燕山北部山地林内小气候的影响[J];中南林业科技大学学报;2015年11期
7 张淑兰;张海军;张武;郭勇;李兴洲;张强;鲁彦;姚嵩坡;;小兴安岭不同森林类型枯落物储量及其持水特性比较[J];水土保持通报;2015年04期
8 张宁;张春茹;凌继华;黄永辉;郭宾良;张建华;;不同经营措施下落叶松林枯落物持水能力的研究[J];黑龙江农业科学;2015年08期
9 刘小兰;;旅游干扰对九寨沟冷杉林下枯落物及其土壤水文功能的影响[J];水土保持研究;2015年02期
10 郭宝宝;;不同人为干扰程度对森林土壤水分物理性质的影响[J];亚热带资源与环境学报;2014年02期
相关博士学位论文 前4条
1 夏祥友;森林经营对东北林区主要森林类型蓄水保土功能的影响[D];东北林业大学;2016年
2 何常清;岷江上游两种典型森林群落生态水文特征研究[D];南京林业大学;2009年
3 苏小青;闽楠群落对不同强度干扰的生态响应[D];福建农林大学;2007年
4 苏春雨;中国森林资源经营管理机制的研究[D];北京林业大学;2005年
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 韩丰泽;经营方式对杉木人工林生态系统的影响研究[D];福建农林大学;2014年
2 苏月秀;我国森林经营现状研究[D];北京林业大学;2012年
3 张静;秦淮河流域主要林分的枯落物和土壤蓄水能力研究[D];南京林业大学;2010年
,本文编号:2364183
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/2364183.html