恩施州耕地土壤酸化现状及石灰等土壤调理剂降酸效果初探
[Abstract]:In the past 80 's,90% of the farmland soil in China has different degree of acidification. In the past 25 years, the pH value of almost all the soil types in China has dropped by 0.13-0.80 units, and the average number of the soil has fallen by 0.5 units, and the acidification phenomenon is very common. Enshi Prefecture, Hubei Province, is located in the hinterland of Wulingshan area, and is affected by natural factors such as environment, climate and other factors, such as crop planting and fertilization, and the soil acidification of cultivated land is getting more and more serious. The problems of crop yield and quality decline induced by soil acidification are also developed and expanded, and become a new hidden danger to the steady development of the agricultural production in Enshi. in ord to provide a thorough understanding of that problem of soil acidification in the cultivated land in Enshi and the like, and to provide the basis for the development of the soil acidification control and the treatment countermeasure, Based on a large number of soil samples collected during the second soil general survey in China (1980-1983) and the evaluation of the quality of cultivated land (2010-2013), the changes of the soil pH value of the cultivated land in Enshi State were analyzed, and the present situation and characteristics of soil acidification in Enshi State were analyzed. The effects of different conditioning agents on the acid soil deacidification effect and the growth of the crops were discussed with the combination of the culture test and the pot experiment, and the effect of the application of lime and the appropriate amount of lime were further verified by field experiments. The results of the main research are as follows:1. In the last 30 years, the soil of Enshi State has a tendency to acidify, and the distribution of the soil pH is in the low pattern of the east and the west. In different areas, the soil pH of different types of cultivated land was decreased to a certain extent. During the second soil general survey, the average soil pH of the cultivated land was 6.5. After 30 years, the soil pH of the cultivated land was reduced to 5.6, the whole decline was 0.90 units, and the degree of soil acidification in the dry land was higher than that of the paddy field. mainly, the change of the structure and the ratio of the fertilizer (the proportion of the nitrogen and phosphorus and the potassium in the chemical fertilizer is severely maladjusted, the amount of the organic fertilizer is rapidly declining), and the high-yield crop is harvested and taken away with a large amount of salt-based nutrients (the fertilizer is used for fertilization and can not be effectively supplemented), 3. Different types of conditioning agents have different acid-reducing effects on the acid soil. The results of the one-year test showed that the effect of quicklime was the best, and that of 0.66 pH units compared with the control treatment, and the content of exchangeable Al in the soil decreased by 2.01 cmol/ kg. In that proces of the straw, although the soil acidity is not effectively reduced, the growth of the crop can be obviously promoted, and therefore, the straw treatment can also be used as an improved substance of the acid soil, and various regulating substances can be applied to the actual production to promote the growth of the crops. The appropriate evaluation index for evaluating the modified acidic soil of basic materials is the potential acid (total amount of soil-exchange acid, soil-exchange H + and soil-exchange aluminum). With the extension of the culture time and the effect of the soil buffering performance, the low-lime dosage (at the amount of 0.9g/ kg) has no obvious effect on increasing the pH of the soil, but the effect of the low-lime is obvious to the reduction of the potential acid of the soil, And the test result of the barley seedling also indicates that the application of the quicklime can obviously increase the biomass of the barley seedling. This indicates that the soil pH as a reflection of the soil acidity, although it has the advantages of simple and rapid test, but only using the pH to assess the effect of the acid soil improvement is not comprehensive.5. The feasibility of using the Ca (OH) _ 2 titration method to calculate the lime requirement is verified. Under the condition of the study (pH3.0), the soil with the modified quicklime significantly promoted the growth of the barley seedlings, and the amount of the quicklime is closely related to the soil improvement effect, and the soil acidity effect is optimized by applying the quicklime 1.8g (corresponding to the amount of 4 t/ hm ~ 2 quicklime) per kilogram of soil. This is the same as that of the lime required by the Ca (OH) _ 2 titration method.6. The results of field validation test are consistent with the culture test. The yield of the corn can be obviously increased by the application of lime. Under the soil conditions of pH 4.31 (Hefeng County) and pH 5.03 (Lichuan), the appropriate amount of lime is 3000 kg/ hm2 and 2250 kg/ hm2, respectively, and the yield is 57.1% and 9.1%, respectively. Under the field condition of pH 5.03, the soil pH of the plowing soil was increased by 0.68 units after the addition of the lime of 2250 kg/ hm2.
【学位授予单位】:华中农业大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:S156.2
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 王梅;蒋先军;;施用石灰与钙蒙脱石对酸性土壤硝化动力学过程的影响[J];农业资源与环境学报;2017年01期
2 陈志良;赵述华;钟松雄;桑燕鸿;蒋晓璐;戴玉;王欣;;添加稳定剂对尾矿土中砷形态及转换机制的影响[J];环境科学;2016年06期
3 杨杉;吴胜军;周文佐;吕明权;张德微;黄平;;三峡库区典型土壤酸碱缓冲性能及其影响因素研究[J];长江流域资源与环境;2016年01期
4 周晓阳;周世伟;徐明岗;Colinet Gilles;;中国南方水稻土酸化演变特征及影响因素[J];中国农业科学;2015年23期
5 鲁艳红;廖育林;聂军;周兴;谢坚;杨曾平;吴浩杰;;长期施用氮磷钾肥和石灰对红壤性水稻土酸性特征的影响[J];土壤学报;2016年01期
6 师江澜;李秀双;王淑娟;李硕;李有兵;田霄鸿;;长期浅耕与秸秆还田对关中平原冬小麦-夏玉米轮作土壤钾素含量及层化比率的影响[J];应用生态学报;2015年11期
7 苏仕艺;胡显军;杜敏;;巴东县土壤酸化现状、成因及治理对策[J];中国农技推广;2015年07期
8 徐仁扣;;土壤酸化及其调控研究进展[J];土壤;2015年02期
9 谷雨;蒋平;李志明;李明德;吴海勇;廖世喜;何旭明;;不同土壤调理剂对酸性土壤的改良效果[J];湖南农业科学;2015年03期
10 姜超强;董建江;徐经年;沈嘉;薛宝燕;祖朝龙;;改良剂对土壤酸碱度和烤烟生长及烟叶中重金属含量的影响[J];土壤;2015年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 周海燕;胶东集约化农田土壤酸化效应及改良调控途径[D];中国农业大学;2015年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 陈安乐;大豆发根转化方法的建立及GmFRD3在大豆耐铝性中的作用[D];吉林大学;2014年
2 周富忠;利川市耕地酸化的成因及治理措施研究[D];长江大学;2012年
3 梁巧凤;石灰和泥炭对土壤镉、铅、锌、铜有效性的影响及其机理研究[D];福建农林大学;2010年
4 李银水;湖北省油菜氮磷钾肥施用效果及肥料推荐用量研究[D];华中农业大学;2009年
5 刘承军;不同改良剂对酸性土壤理化性状和柱花草生长的影响[D];广西大学;2007年
6 郇恒福;不同土壤改良剂对酸性土壤化学性质影响的研究[D];华南热带农业大学;2004年
7 彭世良;湖南土壤酸化与土壤生态系统酸相对敏感性研究[D];湖南师范大学;2002年
,本文编号:2505389
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/shoufeilunwen/zaizhiyanjiusheng/2505389.html