大学英语多模态教学模式对学生英语自主学习能力的影响研究
Chapter One Introduction
1.1 Background of the Present Study
China has developed greatly and then we get more chances to interact with the world so we need numerous professional talents with professional knowledge and skills who have a good command of foreign language. And although learners’ autonomous learning ability makes a great difference in English learning, a lot of college students fail to know how to learn autonomously, especially the non-English-major students. Therefore, it becomes very important to fostering their English learning autonomy and promoting English learning effect. In 2007, Ministry of Higher Education of China drew up “Requirements of College English Teaching”. It mentions that the promotion of students’ ability of reading, listening, speaking, writing, translating and communicating is the purpose of College English Teaching. To be fit for the current situation in China, the teachers need to explore some new methods in English teaching. College English Curriculum Requirements (2007) also presents that modern technology and computer-assisted internet teaching model should be completely utilized. All these indicate that the teachers should apply different teaching methods to improve the students’ English learning. What’s more, for a long time, the traditional college English class is based on text and conversation teaching mode. And also because the class size is too large and class time is too tight, the teachers have to complete the intensive reading, extensive reading, listening, explaining the exercises etc. in a limited time. The result is that the teachers have no time to care about the students’ listening.
.........
1.2 Purpose and Significance of the Present Study
College English teachers have tried their best to use multimedia in their classes fully with the development of modern educational technology. With a positive and lively way to teach, various linguistic semiotics will give an extremely deeper impression on students and teachers can have a better comprehension about what students have actually known. The purpose of the present research is to show the effects of College English multimodal teaching mode on students’ autonomous learning ability through analyzing the results from the questionnaire of English learner autonomy. In other words, the present study aims at figuring out if the multimodal teaching mode can enhance the learners’ autonomous learning ability significantly. This study offers a fundamental and overall theory to illustrate the concept of modality, multimodality, multimodal discourse, multimodal discourse analysis, multimodal teaching and multimodal teaching mode; the way of constructing a multimodal class, the good way of motivating students’ English learning autonomy, and the results of College English multimodal teaching mode on students’ autonomous learning ability. What are mentioned above can bring not only a practical guidance for English teaching as well as theoretical essence. On one hand, multimodal discourse analysis provides a new approach to College English teaching. On the other, it supplies the solution to some problems of teaching. College English teachers can enrich the theoretical structure of College English teaching with Multimodal discourse analysis, improves College English teaching system and helps students to promote their learning autonomy.
.........
Chapter Two Literature Review
This chapter includes three parts. Firstly, a concise introduction to the theories of Modality, Multimodality, Multimodal discourse analysis, Multimodal teaching, and Multimodal teaching mode is given. Secondly, the definition of students’ autonomous learning and characteristics of autonomous learners are reviewed. Thirdly, the research on multimodal teaching and students’ autonomous learning ability abroad and at home are shown.
2.1 Multimodal Teaching Mode
Before we explain the most important conceptümultimodal teaching mode in the present study, some other relevant key terms should be introduced at first. They are modality, multimodality, multimodal discourse, multimodal discourse analysis and multimodal teaching. Modality indicates the interactive action between senses of human, such as sight, touch and hearing and the external conditions, such as people, animals, machines (Gu Yueguo, 2007). This interactive action is achieved by only one kind or some kinds of medium, such as eyes, ears and hands, etc. As a result, we can know that modality means modality means the semiotic resource, and medium refers to the physical resources. Interactive action with just single sense is named single modality. Multimodality is “integrating various symbolic patterns together like speech and picture during an interactive context and situation” (Van Leeuwen, 2005:281). Namely, it researches on connection between various modalities of communication, such as visual, audio, written and oral. Meanwhile, it recodes the significance of discourses which is composed of different semiotic modes. Jweitt (2009) considers that there are two interpretations of the term “multimodality”. One is multimodality as theory for the combination of resources and modes in multimodal phenomenon, and the other is multimodality as research of new fields or the application of a particular approach to fields not previously treated in that way.
....
2.2 Autonomous Learning Ability
It was the notion of “autonomous learning” that opened up discussion about the promotion of learning capacity for the whole life and the development of independent thinkers both of which emerged in 1960s (Gardner and Miller 2002:6). The conception has developed in various geographical areas so that there are a lot of various terminologies to make a definition for it, for instance “learner autonomous ability”, “autonomously learn”, “self-directed learning” “self-regulated learning” and “self-monitoring” etc. Self-directed learning is a complicated multidimensional conception. Because of being short of agreement among all the researchers, it makes defining self-directed studying a tough task. We can categorize concepts of autonomous learning into 4 main types of thought. Autonomous learning being a state Dickinson (1987: 11), considered autonomous learning ability to be “the state in which the students take full responsibilities for all determinations about their study and executing their determinations”. Jeffries (1990) gave a definition of self-regulated as: it is one kind of learning. During the process of learning, the students should be responsible for it by themselves and there was no teachers’ direct intervention in it. The students should take more responsibility for the learning contents, the learning method and the learning schedule. They can assess their learning achievement, too. (Tang Lan, 2014)
........
Chapter Three Methodology ........ 27
3.1 Research Questions ........... 27
3.2 Participants ........ 27
3.3 Instruments ........ 28
3.4 Research Procedures ......... 28
Chapter Four Results and Discussion ......... 35
4.1 Overall Situation of the Participants’ Autonomous Learning Ability ....... 35
4.3 Change of the Students’ Autonomous Ability from Four Dimensions ..... 38
Chapter Five Conclusion ...... 43
5.1 Major Findings .......... 43
5.2 Pedagogical Implications .......... 44
5.3 Limitations of the Study .... 44
5.4 Suggestions for Further Research ..... 45
Chapter Four Results and Discussion
4.1 Overall Situation of the Participants’ Autonomous Learning Ability
The survey will show the level of the participants’ autonomous learning ability before the experiment through analyzing the pre-questionnaire results and the level after experiment through analyzing the post-questionnaire results. The questionnaire is composed of twenty-eight items, and each item has five choices:1 2 3 4 and 5. 1 stands for strongly disagreeable, 1 score; 2 stands for disagreeable, 2 scores; 3 stands for neutral, 3 scores; 4 stands for agreeable, 4 scores; 5 stands for strongly agreeable, 5 scores. The total score of 28 items is 140. According to the students’ total score, the degree of their autonomous learning ability is judged. There are four related results: No autonomy (less than thirty-five points); Low degree of autonomy (between thirty-six and seventy points); Moderate degree of autonomy (between seventy-one and one hundred and six points) and High degree of autonomy (more than one hundred and five points). All the results in the pre-questionnaire and post-questionnaire are presented in Appendix II. From Table 4.1, we can figure out that all the participants’ scores are above thirty-five and below the one hundred and six. Among them, there are fourteen participants whose scores are from 36 and 70, which occupied twenty-three percent, belonging to low degree autonomy. There are forty-six participants whose scores are from 71 to 105, which occupied sixty-seven percent, belonging to moderate degree autonomy.
.........
Conclusion
Through one semester’s research and results analyses, the thesis answered the two questions which were mentioned before. As the summary of study, this chapter has reached a conclusion and presented some findings and implications. Through analyzing the data of thirty students’ pre-questionnaires and post-questionnaires and data analyses, we can find some important results about the effect of College English multimodal teaching mode on the student learning autonomy. Firstly, the students’ English autonomous learning ability can be improved through the application of College English multimodal teaching mode, which can be shown by analyzing the data of the questionnaires. Within the process of English teaching and learning in the experimental class, the various modalities help much in the creation of a more harmonious atmosphere. Under this situation, the student can be self-motivated to find the problems, solve the problems and then adjust their learning strategies. As a result, students learn English more autonomously and their English autonomous learning ability is improved. Secondly, the data analysis of twenty-eight items in the questionnaire indicates that there is indeed a significant difference in terms of setting learning goals and supervising and assessing the learning process and there is no significant difference in terms of applying learning strategies and students’ English learning motivation. That means the application of College English multimodal teaching mode has enhanced the students’ ability to set learning goals and supervise and assess the learning process a lot, but College English multimodal teaching mode can just enhance the students’ ability to apply learning strategies and students’ English motivation a little.
.........
The reference (omitted)
,
本文编号:36314
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenshubaike/shijiedaxue/36314.html