印象人类学的理论素描——民族志影像下的“科学”与“艺术”
发布时间：2019-02-08 16:53
【摘要】：人类学的实践不仅通过语言方式,亦可作为印象的实践,印象人类学是理解民族志影像(照片、电影、录像)的作用的一种新框架。民族志影像,将这样的田野经验印象(准确说是接近于)部分固化,将语言表述下人类学实践难以明晰的、经验的、直接的部分外显。弗拉哈迪、鲁什、加德纳、现代巴西原住民影像制作运动等影像方式的表述,直接呈现了以语言表述的人类学遗漏的民族志现实中微妙的扰动、质感,以及调查者与被调查者之间的关系。扩大民族志影像的作用,有助于将人类学带回"科学"与"艺术"未分化的印象,由此也必将丰富以语言表述的人类学实践。
[Abstract]:The practice of anthropology is a new framework for understanding the role of ethnographic images (photographs, films, videos), not only through language, but also as the practice of impressions. Ethnographic images partially solidify such field empirical impressions (close to those), and express the indistinct, empirical and direct parts of anthropological practice in language. The expressions of images such as Flahadi, Rush, Gardner, Modern Brazilian Aboriginal Image making Movement, and so on, directly present the subtle disturbance and texture in the ethnographic reality that is omitted from anthropology in terms of language. And the relationship between the investigators and the respondents. Expanding the role of ethnographic images will help bring anthropology back to the undifferentiated impression of "science" and "art", which will certainly enrich the anthropological practice expressed in language.
【作者单位】： 日本东京大学综合文化研究院;山东大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：J90-05
本文编号：2418575
[Abstract]:The practice of anthropology is a new framework for understanding the role of ethnographic images (photographs, films, videos), not only through language, but also as the practice of impressions. Ethnographic images partially solidify such field empirical impressions (close to those), and express the indistinct, empirical and direct parts of anthropological practice in language. The expressions of images such as Flahadi, Rush, Gardner, Modern Brazilian Aboriginal Image making Movement, and so on, directly present the subtle disturbance and texture in the ethnographic reality that is omitted from anthropology in terms of language. And the relationship between the investigators and the respondents. Expanding the role of ethnographic images will help bring anthropology back to the undifferentiated impression of "science" and "art", which will certainly enrich the anthropological practice expressed in language.
【作者单位】： 日本东京大学综合文化研究院;山东大学外国语学院;
【分类号】：J90-05
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前8条
1 容观■;关于加强人类学影片研制工作的思考[J];中南民族大学学报(人文社会科学版);2004年02期
2 张楠;曾菀馨;;初探人类学片的研究方法——结构的方法[J];林区教学;2014年08期
3 维克多·特纳;陈熙;;戏剧仪式/仪式戏剧:表演的与自反性的人类学[J];文化遗产;2009年04期
4 黄凤兰;;影视人类学及其作品的意义与功能[J];文化学刊;2007年02期
5 吴冰;;人类学片的结构方法就是研究方法[J];西部广播电视;2014年07期
6 王海龙;欧美人类学电影发展史论[J];宁波大学学报(人文科学版);1995年04期
7 李光庆;;我国人类学影片拍摄观念的变化[J];电影文学;2011年13期
8 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 中国社会科学院社会学研究所 鲍江;“具体性”是人类学电影的基石[N];中国社会科学报;2014年
，本文编号：2418575
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/dianyingdianshilunwen/2418575.html
