从“分别文”“累增字”与“古今字”的关系看后人对这些术语的误解

发布时间：2018-01-09 04:15

本文关键词：从“分别文”“累增字”与“古今字”的关系看后人对这些术语的误解　出处：《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2013年03期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】："分别文""累增字"是王筠研究汉字"重文"时从造字角度提出的文字增繁现象,与沟通文献用字的"古今字"有着不同的学术背景和研究目的,属于不同性质的概念。由于角度不同,它们在材料分析上有交集,所以王筠偶尔用"分别文"或"累增字"指称"古今字"的"今字",意在解释这些"今字"的成因,并未改变"古今字"的历史定义。徐灏是曲解"古今字"本义的源头,他把王筠的"分别文""累增字"跟"载籍古今本"并列,而且在分析说明时把"古今字"主要指向"造字相承,增偏旁"现象。后人受此误导,进一步将"古今字"完全等同于具有"造字相承"关系的"分别文""累增字",并认为这是王筠的"古今字"观念,其实不符合王筠的本意。
[Abstract]:"separate text" and "accumulation of characters" is a phenomenon that Wang Yun put forward from the angle of character creation when studying Chinese character "heavy essay", which has different academic background and research purpose from "ancient and modern characters" which are used in the communication of literature. Concepts of different natures. Because of their different angles, they are intersected in material analysis, so Wang Yun occasionally refers to the "modern and ancient characters" with the words "separate articles" or "cumulative increasing characters". It is intended to explain the causes of these words, but not to change the historical definition of "ancient and modern characters". Xu Hao is the source of misinterpretation of the original meaning of "ancient and modern characters". He juxtaposed Wang Yun's "separate works" and "accumulation of characters" with "ancient and modern books", and pointed "ancient and modern characters" to "creating characters, adding bias" in the analysis and explanation. Later generations were misled by this phenomenon. Furthermore, the "ancient and modern characters" are equated with "separate characters" and "accumulation characters" which have the relationship of "creating characters and inheriting characters", and Wang Yun's concept of "ancient and modern characters" is considered to be incompatible with Wang Yun's original intention.
【作者单位】：北京师范大学民俗典籍文字研究中心/文学院;
【分类号】：H122
【正文快照】： 一、引言“古今字”在传统语言文字学领域有着悠久的历史,它最早由汉代训诂家们提出,指的是文献中记录同一个词项而不同时代使用了不同字符的“历时同词异字”现象。但是,现代学者对“古今字”则有两种不同的理解:一部分学者认同“古今字”指文献用字的“历时同词异字”现象;

【参考文献】