现代汉语“V着”类存在句的ERP研究

发布时间：2018-01-13 17:08

本文关键词：现代汉语“V着”类存在句的ERP研究　出处：《江苏师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：汉语存在句的研究还存在很多问题,其中“NPL+V+着+NP”存在句的生成机制问题是现今学界研究的热点之一。文章以Huang(1997)汉语轻动词句法理论为依据,借助神经电生理学ERP(event-related potentials,事件相关电位)技术,设计实验考查汉语存在句的生成理解过程,实验任务是图片——句子的匹配判断任务,实验材料分别为静态及物“V着”存在句、静态不及物“V着”存在句、动态不及物“V着”存在句及其每个类型相应的变换句。基于ERP实验结果,比较几类句型加工机制的异同,进而对“V着”类存在句的生成机制进行理论分析,考察汉语存在句实时的生成理解过程,以期为汉语存在句,轻动词句法等理论研究提供更多的实证支持。实验结果显示:存在句与变换句之间在LPC成分上有显著差异,不同类型存在句在N400成分上存在显著差异。不同“V着”在N400和P600成分上都具有显著差异,而不同类型存在句在LPC成分上不存在显著差异。通过对上述实验研究结果的分析并结合汉语相关句法理论研究,文章得出结论:第一,N400和P600成分上差异显著表明三类“V着”的加工存在差异,而不同类型存在句在LPC成分上不存在显著差异,表明三类存在句的整体加工没有显著差异。这些结果表明,对“V着”类存在句的划分应当先从动词角度入手,依据动词性质的不同可分为二价及物动词存在句、非宾格动词存在句、非作格动词存在句,然后再根据“V着”表达意义的不同,区分“静态存在句”和“动态存在句”。第二,对比存在句和变换句,发现存在句加工在脑电上诱发的LPC波幅更大,需要耗费更多的大脑资源,这表明这两种句型之间可能存在某种句法转换过程,而存在句及其变换句之间存在轻动词移位关系,这表明轻动词的句法解释存在一定的合理性。
[Abstract]:There exist a lot of problems in Chinese sentence research, which NPL+V+ the generation mechanism of exist sentence +NP "problem is one of the research hotspots in current academic circles. Based on the Huang (1997) on the basis of Chinese light verbs syntactic theory, with the aid of nerve electrophysiology (ERP event-related potentials, ERP) technology, experimental design to examine the formation of Chinese existential sentence comprehension process, the experimental task - the sentence picture matching judgment task, the experimental materials were static and" V "existential sentence," V "static and dynamic existential sentence," V "is intransitive sentence and each type of the corresponding sentence. The experimental results based on ERP transform comparison of several kinds of sentence patterns, processing mechanism, and the" V "class of sentence formation mechanism was analyzed in theory, study Chinese existential sentence in real time in order to understand the formation process of Chinese existential sentence, light verb To provide more empirical support for theoretical research of words method. Experimental results show that the existence of sentence and between sentences in transform LPC component has the remarkable difference, the existence of different types of sentences in the composition of N400 have significant differences. Different "V" have significant differences in N400 and P600 components, and the existence of different types of sentences in LPC the composition has no significant difference. Through the analysis of the experimental results and the combination of Chinese syntactic theory research, this paper draws the conclusion: first, the N400 and P600 components significant difference indicates that the processing of three kinds of "V" are different, and the existence of different types of sentences in the LPC component does not exist significant differences, showed no significant differences between the three types of existential overall processing. These results indicate that the "V" type of existential sentences should be divided from the perspective of verbs, according to the different nature of the verb can be divided into two valence transitive verbs. In the sentence, Unaccusative Verbs are unergative verb sentence, existential sentences, and then according to the "V" meaning, the distinction between "Static Existential Sentences" and "dynamic existential sentence". Second, compared to the presence of sentences and transform sentence, sentence processing found in EEG induced bigger amplitude of LPC that requires more brain resources, it suggests that there may be some syntactic transformation process between these two patterns, and the existence of the light verb shift relation sentence and transformation between sentences, suggesting that the syntactic light verb interpretation has certain rationality.

【学位授予单位】：江苏师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H146

【相似文献】