当前位置:主页 > 文艺论文 > 汉语言论文 >

汉英双项式并列短语的词序制约因素研究

发布时间:2018-02-02 13:16

  本文关键词: 双项式并列短语 词序制约因素 可逆性 词序预测成功率 固化 对比研究 出处:《上海外国语大学》2012年博士论文 论文类型:学位论文


【摘要】:本文以“汉英双项式并列短语的词序制约因素研究”为题,围绕双项式并列短语(也称“并列二项式”)的可逆性和词序制约因素的词序预测成功率,以语料库检索的方式,定量考察词序制约因素,并对比分析词序制约因素在汉英双项式并列短语中的异同。本研究有三个主要目标:考察词序制约因素的词序预测成功率;预测和说明短语固化的过程;描写和解释词序制约因素在汉英中的表现异同。 认知语言学的基本观点与假设、范畴的原型观以及标记理论、语言的象似性、概念整合理论以及词汇化和短语固化构成本研究的理论基础。基于语料库的定量研究方法为全面考察词序制约因素在并列二项式词序中的制约力提供了可能。 制约双项式并列短语词序的主要因素包括语义因素、语音因素和词频因素。语义因素细分为六条次原则:权力、时间、重要性、显著性、积极性、递升原则。 研究发现,首先,汉语中词序制约因素预测成功率的排序为:语义>语音>词频;各语义因素的词序预测能力由强到弱可排列为:重要性>时间,递升,积极性,权力>显著性。英语中语义因素与其他因素的词序预测成功率层级为:递升>时间(象似性),,积极性,重要性>显著性,权力>其他因素;各语义因素的词序预测成功率层级为:递升>时间(象似性),积极性,重要性>显著性,权力。 其次,预测汉语并列二项式的词序固化或不可逆的语义因素由最主要到最次要的排序为:积极性,权力>时间,递升>显著性,重要性;预测英语并列二项式的词序固化或不可逆的语义因素由最主要到最次要的排序为:权力,递升>显著性,重要性>时间,积极性。 汉英并列二项式就词序制约因素的制约力而言有相同也有不同。共同点主要有四方面:语义因素占主导作用;时间和递升因素有很高的词序预测成功率;词频因素制约词序的作用不明显;权力是最能预测固化的主要因素。不同点主要有五方面:汉语并列二项式的固化程度总体上低于英语;语义因素对汉语并列二项式词序的制约作用强于英语,语音因素对英语并列二项式词序的制约作用强于汉语;时间顺序原则对汉语并列二项式词序有普遍的制约作用;重要性因素在汉语并列二项式中的词序预测成功率高于英语;权力因素能更好地预测汉语并列二项式的固化。 语言本体、认知以及民族文化等三方面的特点是造成词序制约因素在汉英并列二项式中表现异同的主要原因。语境制约并列二项式的词序,导致词序突显。
[Abstract]:This paper focuses on "the study of word order restriction factors of Chinese and English double-term parallel phrases", and focuses on the reversibility of two-term juxtaposed phrases (also known as "parallel binomial") and the success rate of word order prediction of word order constraints. In the way of corpus retrieval, the restrictive factors of word order are quantitatively investigated. This study has three main objectives: to investigate the success rate of word order prediction of word order constraint factors; Predict and explain the process of phrase solidification; Describe and explain the similarities and differences of word order constraints in Chinese and English. The basic viewpoints and hypotheses of cognitive linguistics, the archetypal view of category and the theory of marker, the iconicity of language. The theory of conceptual integration and lexicalization and phrase solidification constitute the theoretical basis of this study. The quantitative research method based on corpus provides the possibility to investigate the constraint of word order in the paratactic binomial word order. The main factors restricting the word order of two-item parallel phrases include semantic factors, phonetic factors and word frequency factors. Semantic factors are subdivided into six principles: power, time, importance, significance, enthusiasm. Progressive principle First of all, the order of success rate of word order constraint factors in Chinese is: semantic > phonetic > word frequency; The order prediction ability of each semantic factor from strong to weak can be arranged as: importance > time, rising, enthusiasm. The success rate of word order prediction of semantic factors and other factors in English is as follows: progressive > time (iconicity, enthusiasm, importance > significance, power > other factors); The success rate of word order prediction of each semantic factor is as follows: ascending > time (iconicity, enthusiasm, importance > significance, power). Secondly, it is predicted that the semantic factors of Chinese juxtaposition binomial word order solidification or irreversibility are: enthusiasm, power > time, ascending > significance, importance; The order of semantic factors from the most important to the most secondary is: power, escalation > significance, importance > time, enthusiasm, and so on, in order to predict the word order solidification or irreversibility of English juxtaposition binomial. The binomial coordinate binomial of Chinese and English has the same or different restrictive power in terms of word order restriction factors. There are four aspects in common: semantic factors play a leading role; Time and ascending factors have a high success rate of word order prediction. The effect of word frequency factor on word order is not obvious. Power is the main factor that can predict the solidification. There are five main differences: the curing degree of Chinese binomial is generally lower than that of English; Semantic factors have a stronger effect on Chinese paratactic binomial word order than English, and phonological factors have stronger influence on English paratactic binomial word order than Chinese. The principle of time order has a universal restriction on the word order of Chinese juxtaposition binomial; The success rate of word order prediction in Chinese binomial is higher than that in English. Power factors can better predict the solidification of Chinese binomial juxtaposition. The features of language ontology, cognition and national culture are the main reasons for the similarities and differences of word order constraints in Chinese and English juxtaposition binomial. Context constrains the word order of parallel binomial, which leads to the prominent word order.
【学位授予单位】:上海外国语大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H314;H146

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 周祖谟;汉语骈列的词语和四声[J];北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1985年03期

2 徐盛桓;;心智哲学与认知语言学创新[J];北京科技大学学报(社会科学版);2010年01期

3 廖秋忠;;《语言的共性与类型》述评[J];国外语言学;1984年04期

4 戴浩一;黄河;;时间顺序和汉语的语序[J];国外语言学;1988年01期

5 谢信一;叶蜚声;;汉语中的时间和意象(中)[J];国外语言学;1992年01期

6 胡壮麟;美国功能语言学家Givón的研究现状[J];国外语言学;1996年04期

7 严辰松;语言临摹性概说[J];国外语言学;1997年03期

8 詹卫东;80年代以来汉语信息处理研究述评──作为现代汉语语法研究的应用背景之一[J];当代语言学;2000年02期

9 彭在义;英汉并列词组的词序与翻译[J];大学英语;1988年03期

10 叶建军;“标记”概念刍议[J];福建外语;1999年04期

相关硕士学位论文 前5条

1 高琴;现代汉语并列结构的语序考察[D];山西大学;2004年

2 周欣;现代汉语并列N项式研究[D];河北大学;2006年

3 王会芬;汉英并列结构语序的比较研究[D];安徽大学;2007年

4 于建伟;英语新词名—名复合词研究[D];河南大学;2008年

5 吴茜;试论现代汉语并列结构语序[D];天津师范大学;2009年



本文编号:1484596

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1484596.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户4f613***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com