颜师古、李善于《汉书》、《文

发布时间：2018-02-12 14:01

本文关键词： 《汉书注》《文选注》颜师古李善术语　出处：《暨南大学》2012年博士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在唐代注疏之学中，颜师古和李善堪称代表性人物，他们分别是《汉书》学和文选学的集大成者，各自代表了《汉书》学和《文选》学注释发展的最高水平。《汉书》与《文选》由于年代相去未远，，故其中所收录的作品有重合之处。从两者所处的历史地位和学术价值来看，以颜注和李注对相同作品的注释为研究对象，对两注之间存在的差异和关联进行比较，既可以深化《文选》中作品的理解，为《文选》的研读提供一定的参考意义，还可以为训诂学的发展提供借鉴意义，同时也可以为训诂学史的编写提供依据。本文主要分为三章：第一章主要介绍了颜师古《汉书注》、李善《文选注》及其研究概况，以及本论文的研究内容和意义。第二章主要从标注读音、训释词义、分析句意、阐述语法、揭示修辞、注解典故、阐释题旨和校勘文本八个方面对颜、李两注的注释内容进行比较。第三章从注释术语的形式和功能两方面对颜注、李注中注音、释义、辨字和校勘四种术语的使用情况进行讨论，总结归纳其使用异同。通过以上研究，我们希望可以为训诂学和训诂学史提供一定的参考和借鉴。
[Abstract]:Yan Shigu and Li Shan can be regarded as representative figures in the study of annotation and thinness in the Tang Dynasty. They are the greatest success of the study of "Han Shu" and the study of selected works, respectively. Each represents the highest level of the development of the annotations to the study of "Han Shu" and "selected works". Due to the fact that the time is not far away from "selected works", the works included therein coincide. From the point of view of their historical status and academic value, Taking the annotation of the same works by Yan Zhu and Li Note as the object of study, the differences and relations between the two notes are compared, which can not only deepen the understanding of the works in the selected works, but also provide some reference significance for the study of the selected works. It can also provide reference significance for the development of exegetics and the basis for compiling the history of exegetics. This paper is divided into three chapters: the first chapter mainly introduces Yan Shigu's Hanshu Notes, Li Shan's Notes on Literary works and their research overview, as well as the research content and significance of this thesis. Expounding the grammar, revealing rhetoric, annotating allusions, explaining the tenor and collating text, comparing the annotated contents of Yan and Li's notes. Chapter three gives a comparison of Yan's notes, Li's notes' notes and their meanings from the form and function of the annotated terms. This paper discusses the use of the four terms, summarizes and summarizes the similarities and differences in the use of the four terms. Through the above research, we hope to provide some reference and reference for the exegetics and the history of exegetics.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：博士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13

【相似文献】