跨文化视域中的言意之辨——古代语言与知识的关系范式新探

发布时间：2018-02-24 15:42

本文关键词： 言意之辨古代知识论语言知识跨文化研究　出处：《学术月刊》2013年05期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：在古代言意范式中,物自身或者超越性的终极存在被视为知识的来源,人通过对这个来源的直观和内在的理性反思而获得知识,语言则是人造的表意工具,三者在其中只能单向度地遵从物—意—言的顺序转化。在这个认识框架中,古代的言意之辨在理论上必然得出"言不尽意"的结论。跨文化的视角提供了超越古典范式"目的—工具"的新的理解维度。语言不仅具有工具性意义,某种具体的群体语言更是该文化中个体存在的一部分,反过来规定了该群体整体知识的发展。在现代默会知识论、解释学和语言哲学视野中,语言、文化与知识都具有互为主客体的可能。民族文化与民族语言相互促进的辩证过程提供了克服"言不尽意"的可能。
[Abstract]:In the paradigm of words and meanings in ancient times, the ultimate existence of things themselves or transcendence is regarded as the source of knowledge. Human beings acquire knowledge through intuitionistic and internal rational reflection of this source, and language is an artificial means of expression. Among them, the three can only follow the order of material-meaning and speech in one direction. In this framework of cognition, In theory, the differentiation of speech and meaning in ancient times inevitably leads to the conclusion that "words do not mean everything". The cross-cultural perspective provides a new understanding dimension that transcends the classical paradigm of "Skope-tool". Language is not only instrumental in meaning. A specific group language is a part of the individual existence in this culture, which in turn defines the development of the whole knowledge of the group. In the view of modern tacit knowledge theory, hermeneutics and linguistic philosophy, language, Culture and knowledge are both subject and object, and the dialectical process of mutual promotion between national culture and national language provides the possibility to overcome "speech is not intended".
【作者单位】：浙江大学哲学系;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金资助项目(2012M511898)阶段性成果
【分类号】：H0-05

【共引文献】