简论王若虚的训诂学成就及历史地位
发布时间:2018-03-01 23:20
本文关键词: 王若虚 《滹南遗老集》 训诂成就 历史地位 出处:《华中师范大学》2012年硕士论文 论文类型:学位论文
【摘要】:王若虚是金代著名的经学家和文献学家。他在训释古代典籍时往往能融合汉儒“朴学”传统,又兼取宋儒新的学术精神。他治学朴实,又敢于大胆辨惑,在训诂方面多有创获,对后世也产生了极大影响。 本文以《滹南遗老集》为主要研究材料,深入探讨了王若虚的训诂理论、训诂内容和方法,总结了他的训诂成就和历史贡献。全文分四个部分进行论述: 第一部分是绪论,主要介绍本选题的意义价值、研究现状以及本文的研究方法。 第二部分重点论述王若虚的训诂成就。主要从训诂理论、训诂内容和训诂方法三个方面展开:其训诂内容涉及全面,广博扎实;训诂理论精见识到;训诂方法多样,以考辩法为主,带有鲜明的时代特色。 第三部分是本文的重点,主要从四个方面论述了王若虚在中国训诂学史上的地位及影响。他朴实的治学态度和大胆质疑的精神对当时及后代都有积极的作用和影响,他的一些训诂成果更是奠定了他在训诂学史上的地位。 第四部分为余论,评析了王若虚在经典训诂上的不足之处。主要有两方面,是对《史记》贬斥有失允之处,二是在词义训释方面的错误。 总之,文章既在共时平面上研究王若虚训诂理论及方法,又在历时平面上把王若虚放在训诂学史的大背景下考察其成就地位及其对后世的影响。另外,还将其理论成果与个案研究结合起来综合考察,彼此互证,力求做到切合历史本真。
[Abstract]:Wang Ruoxu is a famous scholar and bibliographer in Jin Dynasty. When he interprets ancient books and works, he often combines the tradition of "simple learning" of Han Confucianism with the new academic spirit of Song Confucianism. It also had a great impact on later generations. In this paper, taking the collection of the South Niigata Legend as the main research material, the author deeply discusses Wang Ruoxu's exegetical theory, exegetical contents and methods, summarizes his achievements in exegesis and his historical contributions. The thesis is divided into four parts:. The first part is the introduction, mainly introduces the significance of this topic, research status and research methods. The second part focuses on Wang Ruoxu's achievements in exegesis, mainly from three aspects: exegesis theory, exegetical content and exegetical method: its exegetical content involves comprehensive, extensive and solid, exegetical theory is well informed, and exegesis methods are various. The main method of examination and debate, with distinctive characteristics of the times. The third part is the focus of this paper, mainly from four aspects to discuss Wang Ruoxu's position and influence in the history of Chinese exegetics. Some of his exegesis achievements have established his position in the history of exegetics. In the 4th part, the author comments on Wang Ruoxu's shortcomings in the classical exegesis. There are two main aspects, which are derogatory criticism of the Book of History and mistakes in the interpretation of the meaning of the word. In a word, the article not only studies the theory and method of Wang Ruoxu's exegesis on the synchronic plane, but also puts Wang Ruoxu in the background of the history of exegetics on the diachronic plane to investigate his status of achievement and its influence on later generations. The theoretical results are combined with the case studies to verify each other in order to conform to the historical truth.
【学位授予单位】:华中师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2012
【分类号】:H13
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 王其秀;;论王若虚的校勘实践[J];安徽工业大学学报(社会科学版);2010年06期
2 陈良中;;论王若虚《尚书义粹》的解经特色[J];重庆师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2011年01期
3 孙良明;王若虚《滹南遗老集》中的语法分析(一)──兼谈中国古代语法学在宋金时代的重大发展[J];古汉语研究;1995年02期
4 孙良明;王若虚《滹南遗老集》中的语法分析(二)──兼谈中国古代语法学在宋金时代的重大发展[J];古汉语研究;1995年03期
5 雷恩海;苏利国;;崇经重史 惟真惟实——王若虚文学观与其经学、史学思想的辩证关系[J];甘肃社会科学;2010年04期
6 李长庚;王若虚训诂思想述评[J];益阳师专学报;1997年01期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 周春健;元代四书学研究[D];华中师范大学;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 王其秀;王若虚语言学研究[D];山东师范大学;2006年
,本文编号:1554035
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1554035.html