郝懿行《尔雅义疏》“义同”类词语研究

发布时间：2018-03-18 12:00

本文选题：《尔雅义疏》　切入点：“义同”　出处：《陕西师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：郝懿行的《尔雅义疏》是《尔雅》注本中最精善者。本文对《义疏》中的“义同”类词语进行整理、分析,通过对“义同”类词语语义关系的研究,进一步归纳、总结郝懿行的同义观,力求在全面认识郝氏同义观的基础上对郝氏的同义观展开评价。除绪论外,本文分为三部分。第一部分介绍“义同”使用概况。从表现形式、分布情况及揭示的语义关系三个方面入手。“义同”类词语的表现形式主要有三种：“义同”、“同义”、“同意”,三者揭示的语义关系包括同义词、同源词、反义词、异体字、古今字、意义相近或相关以及其他类情况。第二部分总结“义同”类词语所反映的郝氏同义观。从同义词界定、同义词辨析、同义词词性、同义词构组四个方面归纳、总结。郝氏的同义词界定标准主要有四种。在辨析同义词时,郝氏能够从词义的来源、范围、内涵、词义的演变等方面入手,并能广泛征引经传古注。郝氏构组的179组“义同”类词语,大多词性相同,个别组词性不同。这些词语多为单音节组合,但也存在复音节组合,以及单音节和复音节组合的情况。第三部分是对郝氏同义观的评价。从郝氏同义观的成就和不足两个方面展开评价。郝懿行继承和发展了《尔雅》的同义认知,以词义为研究对象,能够自觉地将具有相同义项的词归为同义词。但由于时代和作者自身的局限,郝懿行的同义词观也有诸多不足。例如,重判定、轻辨析,对同义关系判定有误,对同义关系的分析有误。
[Abstract]:Hao Yi-hsing 's < Erya Yi Shu > is the best and most kind person in the note book. This paper collates and analyzes the semantic relations of the "meaning and the same" words in the "Yi Shu", and further generalizes the semantic relationship between the "meaning and the same" words. This paper summarizes Hao Yixing's synonymy view and tries to evaluate Hao's synonymy view on the basis of comprehensive understanding of Hao's synonym view. In addition to the introduction, this paper is divided into three parts. The first part introduces the general situation of the use of "Yi Tong". There are three kinds of expressions of "synonym", "synonym", "synonym" and "consent", which include synonyms, homonyms, antonyms, variant characters and ancient and modern characters. The second part summarizes the concept of Hao's synonyms reflected in the category of "synonym". Summing up. There are mainly four criteria for defining the synonyms of Hao. In discriminating and analyzing synonyms, Hao can start with the origin, scope, connotation, evolution of the meaning of words, etc. There are 179 groups of "same meaning" words in Hao's construction group, most of which are the same in part of speech and different in each group. Most of these words are monosyllabic combinations, but there are also complex syllable combinations. And the combination of monosyllabic and complex syllable. The third part is the evaluation of Hao's synonymy. The evaluation is made from two aspects: the achievement and deficiency of Hao's synonym. Hao Yixing inherits and develops the synonymous cognition of < Erya >. Taking the meaning of words as the object of study, we can consciously classify the words with the same meanings as synonyms. However, due to the limitations of the times and the authors themselves, Hao Yi-xing 's synonym view also has many shortcomings. The judgment of synonymous relation is wrong, and the analysis of synonymous relation is wrong.
【学位授予单位】：陕西师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H131

【参考文献】