《说文解字》段注引《孟子》训诂研究

发布时间：2018-03-21 15:17

本文选题：段玉裁　切入点：《说文解字注》　出处：《辽宁师范大学》2014年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：本文主要以《说文解字注》中引《孟子》作为材料，来研究段玉裁对《孟子》的研究。再根据赵岐的《孟子章句》和朱熹的《四书章句集注》中对《孟子》的解释来判定段氏的论断，并找出历代文献材料中也运用这一用法，采用这一方法的例子，作为文献佐证，以期对段玉裁的《孟子》研究进行全面的梳理探究。本文主要采用统计法、列举法和比较法。将《说文解字注》中引《孟子》材料做了穷尽式的整理，共找出241处。把段氏的注释与历代《孟子》研究学者的注释进行列举比较，以此来展示语言的发展脉络。本文主要分三个部分。第一部分是绪论，，主要对本文研究的目的、方法和意义进行阐述。第二部分是段氏《孟子》的训诂成就，通过因声求义、辨析字形、辨析字义三种方式来阐发段玉裁对《孟子》研究的训诂成就。第三部分是段氏《孟子》的不足，这里主要是就音韵学方面的不足予以列举，并明确原因。本文的核心部分是论文的第二部分，通过声训、形训、义训三个角度对段注引《孟子》的训诂方法进行阐释。声训分为同音字，声母相同考查韵部关系，韵部相同考查声母关系三个方面。形训分为古今字、异体字、假借字三个角度，对字形和字源进行探究。义训从引申义、俗语、义界、互训、比较、描述五个方面来解析段注引《孟子》材料，并一一分析，此处采用的是哪一种义训方法，并配以历史材料佐证。关于经籍的研究一般是分为两个方面：一是专门对经籍本身进行注释阐发；另外一种是把经籍作为材料进行释义研究，这实际上也等于是对经籍的进行注释。例如对于《孟子》的研究就是这样，有对《孟子》书本身的训诂、考证、文风等方面的研究，还有一种是诸如在段玉裁《说文解字注》中将《孟子》作为材料引出，这实际上也是对《孟子》的注释研究。纵观各个历史时期的《孟子》研究，对其注释阐发的书籍很多，但把《孟子》作为材料，来考察《段注》对其研究的书籍甚少。本文力主于这一方面的研究，从全新的角度来研究对《孟子》的注释。
[Abstract]:In this paper, Mencius is cited as the material in Shuowen Jie Zi Note. To study Duan Yu-cai 's study of Mencius. Then, according to the interpretation of Mencius in Zhao Qi's Mencius sentence and Zhu Xi's interpretation of Mencius, and to find out that this usage is also used in the literature and materials of the past dynasties, An example of this method is used as evidence in the literature in order to make a comprehensive research on Mencius by Duan Yucai. In this paper, the statistical method, enumeration method and comparative method are mainly used. The materials cited from Mencius in Shuowen Jie Zi Note are arranged in an exhaustive manner, and 241 places are found out. The comments of Duan's are compared with those of the scholars of Mencius in the past dynasties. To show the development of language. This paper is divided into three parts. The first part is the introduction, which mainly expounds the purpose, method and significance of this study. The second part is the achievement of the exegesis of Duan's Mencius. The third part is the deficiency of Duan's Mencius. The core part of this paper is the second part of the thesis, which explains the exegesis method of "Mencius" from the three angles of sound training, form training and righteousness training. The prosodic part examines the consonant relationship in three aspects. The form training is divided into ancient and modern characters, variant characters and false borrowing characters, to probe into the font and the source of the characters. The meaning and training are compared from the exhortation of the meaning, the common saying, the semantic boundary, the mutual training, and the comparison. This paper describes five aspects to explain the material cited by Mencius, and analyzes it one by one, which method is used here, and is supported by historical materials. There are generally two aspects to the study of Confucian classics: one is to annotate and expound the classics itself; the other is to study the interpretation of the classics as materials. In fact, this is also tantamount to annotating the classics. For example, this is the case with the study of Mencius. There are studies on the exegesis, textual research, literary style, and so on in the book of Mencius. There is another one, such as the introduction of Mencius as a material in Duan Yu-cai 's "Shuo Wen Jie Zi Notes", which is actually also a study of the annotation of "Mencius". Throughout all historical periods, Mencius has been studied and interpreted in many books. However, there are very few books on Mencius to investigate the study of Mencius. This paper is devoted to the study of Mencius from a new perspective.
【学位授予单位】：辽宁师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2014
【分类号】：H131

【参考文献】