副词“光”和“净”的比较分析

发布时间：2018-03-22 00:28

本文选题：光　切入点：净　出处：《上海师范大学》2012年硕士论文　论文类型：学位论文

【摘要】：在现代汉语中，“光”和“净”是两个比较特殊的词，尤其是作为限制性范围副词时，二者在句法、语义、语用等方面有很多相似之处。一直以来，汉语学界对限制类范围副词“光、只、仅、单、独”等的研究较多，对各个词之间的异同也做了比较深入的分析。但从多角度对“光”和“净”这两个副词做出比较分析的较少。本文主要从句法、语义和语用三个方面对“光”和“净”做比较分析。试对以上问题做出合理的解释，找出原因，重点比较二者在作为限制性范围副词时的异同，并对造成二者差异的原因进行探索，以及在对外汉语教学中的指导意义。本文第一章绪论部分说明本文的研究范围，阐述论文的选题意义，并对前人的研究成果进行总结。介绍了本文研究所运用的理论方法和语料来源。第二章：对“光”和“净”的句法特征进行对比分析，首先对语法学界有争议的“限制性范围副词”进行界定，接着指明“光”和“净”的词性。然后从修饰成分、否定形式、能进入的特殊句式和与其他限制性范围副词的共现等方面，重点对“光”和“净”的语法分布进行描写，旨在揭示二者在句法特征方面的异同。第三章：本章对“光”和“净”的语义和语用特征进行对比分析，指出二者的词语义项的不同，并从静态和动态两个方面对比二者的语义指向差异。探讨它们在情感色彩、句类选择、篇章功能等方面的差异。第四章：这一章重点研究了“光”和“净”的语法化历程，试图探索二者虚化的动因和机制。并对比“光”和“净”由实到虚的演化过程中的不同之处。第五章：结语。
[Abstract]:In modern Chinese, "light" and "net" are two relatively special words, especially as restricted range adverbs, they have many similarities in syntax, semantics, pragmatics and so on. For a long time, there has been a lot of research in the field of Chinese to limit the scope of adverbs, such as "light, only, only, single, alone" and so on. The similarities and differences between different words are also analyzed in depth. However, there are few comparative analyses of "light" and "net" adverbs from various angles. This paper makes a comparative analysis of "light" and "net" in semantic and pragmatic aspects, tries to make a reasonable explanation of the above problems, finds out the reasons, and compares their similarities and differences when they are used as restricted range adverbs. It also explores the causes of the difference and its guiding significance in teaching Chinese as a foreign language. In the first chapter, the author explains the scope of the research, expounds the significance of the topic, summarizes the previous research results, and introduces the theoretical methods and data sources used in this study. Chapter two: the contrastive analysis of syntactic features of "light" and "net". Firstly, it defines the controversial "restricted range adverbs" in grammatical circles, and then points out the parts of speech of "light" and "net". In this paper, the grammatical distribution of "light" and "net" is described in order to reveal the similarities and differences between them in syntactic features. Chapter three: this chapter makes a comparative analysis of the semantic and pragmatic characteristics of "light" and "net", points out the differences of their meanings, and contrasts their semantic points from static and dynamic aspects. The differences of sentence type selection, text function and so on. Chapter four: this chapter focuses on the grammaticalization of light and net, and tries to explore the causes and mechanisms of their nihilization, and compares the differences in the evolution of light and net from real to virtual. Chapter 5th: conclusion.
【学位授予单位】：上海师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】