韩国及马来西亚学生句法认知难度初探

发布时间：2018-04-13 22:21

本文选题：留学生 + 句法　；参考：《语言教学与研究》2013年02期

【摘要】：本文采用句法判断和修改任务,考察了不同汉语水平及不同国家留学生对状语、定语和补语等不同句法错误的认知难度。结果发现:(1)学生的句法判断和修改成绩受到句法错误类型的影响。状语错误的修改成绩好于定语错误,定语错误修改成绩好于补语错误;初、中级学生成绩的差异主要表现在定语和补语错误的判断上。(2)学生错误判断的成绩好于错误修改成绩。(3)马来西亚学生状语和定语修改成绩没有差异,明显好于补语成绩;而韩国学生则呈现出明显的阶梯性变化的趋势,状语修改成绩好于定语修改成绩,而定语修改成绩又好于补语成绩。不同国家的学生既表现了学习的共性也表现了各自的特性。
[Abstract]:Using the task of syntactic judgment and modification, this paper investigates the cognitive difficulties of different syntactic errors such as adverbials, attributives and complements among foreign students from different countries and different levels of Chinese.It was found that the syntactic judgment and revision scores of the students were influenced by the types of syntactic errors.The correction of adverbial errors is better than that of attributive errors, and the modification of attributive errors is better than that of complement errors.The difference of middle level students' scores mainly shows in the judgment of attributive and complement errors. 2) the students' wrong judgment results are better than that of wrong revision scores. 3) there is no difference in the scores of adverbial and attributive modification of Malaysian students, which is obviously better than that of complement.The Korean students showed an obvious trend of ladder change, the adverbial revision score was better than the attributive revision score, and the attributive revision score was better than the complement score.Students from different countries not only show the commonness of learning, but also show their own characteristics.
【作者单位】：北京外国语大学中国语言文学学院;
【分类号】：H195

【参考文献】