《古汉语常用字字典》（第4版）书证、释义商补

发布时间：2018-04-15 01:40

本文选题：《古汉语常用字字典》 + 第4版　；参考：《河南师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：《古汉语常用字字典》（以下简称《字典》），是一部具有里程碑意义的古汉语工具书。它是在新中国成立之后，由王力、唐作藩、蒋绍愚等先生运用现代语言学观点和辞书学方法编写的一部古代汉语权威字典。《字典》一经出版，便受到了读者的欢迎和好评。因为它释义科学、审音准确、例句精当，十分符合古汉语学习者的需要，所以也成了学习古汉语必备的工具书。目前，《字典》一共出了四版，即1979年版，，1993年版，1998年版和2005年版。其中，1993年版被评为第一届中国图书奖一等奖。在取得瞩目成就的同时，我们发现，《字典》（第4版）并非尽善尽美。由于词条繁多、编纂体例限制、修订时间有限以及排版工作的繁重等原因，《字典》（第4版）在书证和释义方面不可避免地存在一些失误。目前，国内不少语言学工作者对《字典》（第4版）表示关注。有的学者评述《字典》的特点和价值，也有研究者直接引用《字典》中的成果，还有不少学者提出了对《字典》释义及书证诸方面的质疑。在前人研究成果的基础上，笔者充分运用数据库和图书馆藏，针对《字典》（A——N）部分的词条进行探究，后归纳为如下问题：一、书证问题（例证过晚、排序不当、引文有误等）；二、释义问题（释义不当、义项缺失、误断后起意义等）；三、综合问题；四、其他问题（读音问题、体例问题等）。笔者依据“有据可查、原原本本”的原则，对《字典》（A——N）的词条逐一校正，制成资料卡片，并结合典籍整理出订补意见，以“商补献疑”之名列出，希望为《字典》的完善贡献自己的绵薄之力。敬请方家不吝赐教。
[Abstract]:"The words commonly used in ancient Chinese Dictionary" (hereinafter referred to as the "dictionary >), is a milepost significance of ancient Chinese books. It is after the new China was founded by Wang Li, Tang Zuofan, Mr. Jiang Shaoyu uses modern linguistic perspective and methodology of a dictionary written in ancient Chinese authoritative dictionary.
< > dictionary was published, it has been welcomed by readers and praise. Because of its interpretation of scientific, accurate pronunciation, sentence and is in line with the needs of theancient Chinese learners, so that it became the necessary reference book for studying ancient Chinese Dictionary > <. At present, out of a total four edition, 1979 edition the 1993 edition, 1998 edition and the 2005 edition. Among them, the 1993 edition was named the first Chinese book award first prize.
With the outstanding achievements, we found that the < > Dictionary (Fourth Edition) is not perfect. The entry is various, compiling style restrictions, revision of the limited time and heavy work layout and other reasons, < > Dictionary (Fourth Edition) inevitably exists some mistakes in the documentary evidence and interpretation.
At present, many domestic workers in the < > linguistics Dictionary (Fourth Edition) expressed concern. Some scholars comment on the characteristics and value of < > is the dictionary, researchers directly refer to < > in the dictionary, there are many scholars have questioned the < > dictionary interpretation and documentary evidence aspects.
On the basis of previous research results, the author makes full use of the database and the library, according to < > Dictionary (A - N) part of the entry inquiry, after summarized as the following questions: first, the problems of documentary evidence (examples of late, sort of improper citation error etc.); two, the interpretation of questions (improper interpretation, meaning lack of error after meaning etc.); three, comprehensive problems; four, other problems (the pronunciation problem, system problem and so on).
According to "well documented, as" the principle of < > (A - N) dictionary entries one by one correction, made the data card, and combined with the books sorting out the suggestion of mending, "to fill in the list", hope to improve the dictionary < > contributing. Please post the generous with your criticism.

【学位授予单位】：河南师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H163

【参考文献】