汉韩选择复句对比
发布时间:2018-04-17 01:26
本文选题:汉韩 + 选择复句 ; 参考:《延边大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:复句是语言学界研究的重要领域之一,也是使用频率较高的聚合类之一,一直受到语法学家的关注,其中选择复句是使用频率较高的一类复句。本文在前人研究成果的基础上,运用对比语言学理论与方法,对汉语和韩国语的选择复句进行语义和句法方面的对比,从中找出中韩两种语言在选择关系表达上的异同点。 第一章绪论部分,主要介绍了论文的研究内容与范围、研究目的与意义以及前人的研究概况和语料来源等。 第二章对汉韩选择复句的分类以及语义方面进行了分析。首先对汉语选择复句和韩国语选择复句进行了分类,其次对汉语选择复句关联词以及韩国语选择复句接续词尾的语义特征进行了介绍。 第三章首先考察了汉韩选择复句的基本构成,其次从对立关系、差异关系对汉韩选择复句前后分句的关系进行了对比分析,最后考察汉韩选择复句的句类选择,主要从陈述句、疑问句、感叹句和祈使句等方面进行的分析。 第四章首先从主语的位置和主语的一致性两方面对汉韩选择复句的主语进行了对比分析,再次考察了汉韩选择复句对谓语的选择问题,最后对汉韩选择复句中的否定标记的位置进行了分析。 最后是结语部分,概括全文的主要内容并指出论文的不足点。 本文的对比研究会有利于第二语言汉语(韩国语)习得者能够更好地掌握目的语,而且对汉韩(韩汉)双向翻译具有一定的参考价值。
[Abstract]:Complex sentence is one of the most important research fields in the field of linguistics, and it is also one of the aggregation classes with high frequency of use. It has been paid close attention to by linguists all the time, among which the choice of complex sentence is a kind of complex sentence with high frequency.On the basis of previous studies, this paper compares the semantic and syntactic aspects of Chinese and Korean alternative complex sentences by using the theory and method of contrastive linguistics, and finds out the similarities and differences between Chinese and Korean in the expression of choice relations.The first chapter introduces the content and scope of the research, the purpose and significance of the research, the former research situation and the source of the corpus.The second chapter analyzes the classification and semantic aspects of Chinese and Korean selective complex sentences.This paper first classifies Chinese selected complex sentences and Korean selected complex sentences, and then introduces the semantic features of Chinese selected complex sentence related words and Korean selective complex sentences.The third chapter first examines the basic composition of Chinese and Korean selected complex sentences, and then makes a comparative analysis of the relationship between Chinese and Korean choice of complex sentences from the perspective of opposites and differences, and finally examines the choice of sentence types between Chinese and Korean choice of complex sentences, mainly from the perspective of declarative sentences.The analysis of interrogative sentence, exclamatory sentence and imperative sentence.In the fourth chapter, the author makes a comparative analysis of the subject of the Chinese and Korean selected complex sentences from the position of the subject and the consistency of the subject, and then examines the choice of the Chinese and Korean selected complex sentences to the predicates.Finally, the position of negative markers in Chinese and Korean choice complex sentences is analyzed.The last part is the conclusion, which summarizes the main contents of the paper and points out the shortcomings of the paper.The contrastive study of this paper will help the learners of the second language Chinese (Korean) to master the target language better, and it will also have some reference value for the two-way translation of Chinese and Korean (Korean and Chinese).
【学位授予单位】:延边大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:H146;H55
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 李国庆;现代汉语的“不是P,也是Q”复句[J];安徽教育学院学报;2002年05期
2 张剑;取舍复句类别及其修辞作用新探[J];鞍山师范学院学报;1994年01期
3 聂焱;汉语复句基本类型的思维形式[J];固原师专学报;1996年05期
4 朱子良;选择复句与选言命题[J];衡阳师专学报(社会科学);1995年01期
5 尹蔚;;选择关系标记关联模式探究[J];汉语学报;2010年01期
6 尹蔚;;有标选择复句语用价值探察[J];汉语学报;2013年03期
7 邢福义;;现代汉语的“要么P,要么Q”句式[J];世界汉语教学;1987年04期
8 赵秀娟;;“或者”句与“要么”句的功能解析及教学策略[J];世界汉语教学;2011年04期
9 王天佑;;“与其A不如B”的语义及认知分析[J];现代语文;2006年06期
10 韩滨;;现代汉语选择复句研究综述[J];语文学刊;2011年17期
,本文编号:1761468
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1761468.html