中英高等教育语篇的批评性比较分析

发布时间：2018-04-24 21:23

本文选题：语篇-历史分析方法 + 高等教育语篇　；参考：《吉林大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文运用语篇-历史分析方法中的谓语指示策略、视角化策略和强化策略对相关的中英高等教育语篇进行比较分析，旨在揭示这些语篇的相同点和不同点并探讨其原因，分析权力机构是怎样运用语言来向公众有力地传达信息、影响公众思想的。谓语指示策略是在谓语中使用具有否定意义或肯定意义的词语对社会活动者赋予褒义或贬义。视角化策略是指运用报道、描述、引用等方法以表明作者的态度。强化策略是指通过加强话语的言外之力以强化作者对某一事件的态度。本文选取的语料包括2007至2011年中国政府工作报告中的高等教育语篇和英国政府和高等教育政策机构发布的高等教育语篇。本文作者从中选取20段进行比较分析，研究表明由于政府的目的都是为了更好地表达其对高等教育的积极态度和取得公众的支持，中英语篇在运用以上策略方面存在共同点；由于两国的体制、国情和文化的差异，两者又存在一定的不同点。其相同点是：(1)中英语篇都运用具有积极意义的谓语、定语或表语来表达权力机构对高等教育的态度。(2)中英语篇都从描述政府自身所做的努力出发来展示在高等教育方面所取得的成果。其不同点是：(1)中国政府的语篇中运用陈述句表明了政府支持高等教育发展的决心；英语语篇中运用虚拟语气表明政府对高等教育未来发展的设想。(2)中国政府的语篇中运用同义词和排比来达到强化的效果；英语语篇则运用对比来起到强调的作用。本研究对英语教学具有一定的借鉴意义。首先，教师可以将语篇-历史研究方法中的分析策略传授给学生，，从而更好地培养其批评性阅读能力。其次，本研究有助于培养学生的跨文化交际能力。最后，本研究有助于学习者对机构话语的理解。
[Abstract]:This paper makes a comparative analysis of the relevant higher education discourses in both English and Chinese by using predicate deixis strategies, perspective strategies and reinforcement strategies in text-history analysis, in order to reveal the similarities and differences of these texts and to explore the reasons for them. Analyze how authorities use language to convey information to the public and influence public thinking. Predicate demonstrative strategy is to use negative or positive words in predicates to give positive or derogatory meanings to social activists. The strategy of visual angle refers to the use of reports, descriptions, citations and other methods to show the author's attitude. Reinforcement strategy is to strengthen the author's attitude towards an event by strengthening the force of utterance. The selected language materials include the higher education discourse in the Chinese government work report from 2007 to 2011 and the higher education discourse published by the British government and the higher education policy institutions. In this paper, the author selects 20 paragraphs for comparative analysis. The research shows that since the purpose of the government is to better express its positive attitude towards higher education and to gain public support, there are some common points in the use of the above strategies in the Chinese and English texts; Because of the system, national conditions and cultural differences between the two countries, there are some differences between the two countries. The similarities are that both English texts use positive predicates. The English articles in English show the achievements in higher education from describing the efforts made by the government itself. The difference is that: (1) the use of declarative sentences in the discourse of the Chinese government shows the government's determination to support the development of higher education; The use of subjunctive mood in English discourse indicates the government's assumption of the future development of higher education. This study has some reference significance for English teaching. First of all, teachers can teach students the analytical strategies in discourse-history research, so that they can better develop their critical reading ability. Secondly, this study is helpful to cultivate students' cross-cultural communicative competence. Finally, this study helps learners to understand institutional discourse.
【学位授予单位】：吉林大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H052

【参考文献】