中国庭审中公诉人问话的会话分析

发布时间：2018-05-06 15:35

本文选题：公诉人 + 问话　；参考：《浙江师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：目前,对法律语言学中的问话研究主要集中在问句类型和问句功能两大方面。其中,研究中存在的以下两个问题为部分学者所关注：(1)大部分的研究把问话当成单个的话语(如,问句)而不是会话序列进行研究；(2)大部分为法律和社会语言学研究,鲜有交际的视角(Chang2004:706)。作为对庭审会话中公诉人问话的会话功能实证研究,本文结合了会话分析和语用学两个角度,对搜集的相关语料进行了分析。具体的说,本文提出的研究问题有以下几点： 1.庭审中,公诉人问话有哪些会话功能? 2.公诉人是如何设计问话来完成这些功能的? 3.影响公诉人问话对答语控制的因素有哪些? 研究得出的主要结论概括如下： 1.公诉人的问话主要有引出叙述,引出信息,要求确认三种功能。 2.是非问句和特殊疑问句多用来引出叙述；一词答语的特殊疑问句用来引出信息；是非问句,选择问句以及被听者认为是疑问句的陈述句(B event)都会被用来要求确认信息。 3.公诉人对回答者的合作程度的认知会决定他对回答的控制。不同于他对证人,公诉人对被告人的问话会使用更多的问句类型并且带有更多的策略。这些可以用合作原则来说明。
[Abstract]:At present, the research on question in forensic linguistics mainly focuses on two aspects: question type and question function. Among them, the following two problems in the study are concerned by some scholars: (1) most of the studies focus on questioning as a single utterance (such as question sentences) rather than conversational sequences. Most of them are legal and sociolinguistic studies. The rarely communicative perspective is Chang2004: 706. As an empirical study on the conversational functions of public prosecutor's interrogations in court sessions, this paper analyzes the collected corpus from two perspectives: conversational analysis and pragmatics. Specifically, the research issues raised in this paper are as follows: 1. What conversational functions does the prosecutor have during the trial? 2. How do prosecutors design interrogations to perform these functions? 3. What are the factors that affect the control of the public prosecutor's interrogations? The main findings of the study are summarized as follows: 1. The public prosecutor's questioning mainly elicits narration, elicits information and requests confirmation of three functions. 2. The non-question sentence and the special question sentence are used to elicit the narration; the special question sentence of the answer is used to elicit information; the right question sentence, the selective question sentence and the statement sentence / event that the listener regards as the interrogative sentence are all used to ask for confirmation of the information. 3. The prosecutor's perception of the respondent's level of cooperation determines his control of the answer. Unlike his witnesses, prosecutors use more types of questions and more tactics for defendants. These can be explained by the principle of cooperation.
【学位授予单位】：浙江师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H13;D90-055

【相似文献】