副词“也”、“又”的篇章衔接功能研究
本文选题:也 + 又 ; 参考:《华东师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:本文在分析显性类同标记的使用和“也”体现出语义的对应情况之后,提出了关于“也”的语义的观点:本文认为“也”的基本意义是类同义,在类同义的基础上产生追述义,类同义主要通过显性类同标记表示出来,也可通过近义词语表示,随着显性类同标记和近义词语逐渐被替代,类同意义逐渐减弱,在深层语义之中体现出来,而追述意义不断显现。“又”具有三个不同的语义,分别为:重复义、相继义和累加义。 本文考察了现代汉语副词“也”和“又”的事件衔接功能。认为“也”可以衔接并存型事件,进一步将“也”衔接并存型事件从事件之间关系的角度分为两个大类和十一个小类。认为“又”可以衔接连贯型事件和并存型事件,继而根据衔接后事件之间的语义关系分出了八个类别。 文章比较了“也”和“又”事件衔接功能,认为“也”只可以衔接并存型事件,“又”可以衔接连贯型事件和并存型事件;“也”衔接的事件之间必须有类同义,而且是顺承发展的事件,“又”可以衔接相对独立、无依存关系的非顺承发展事件。 重点讨论了“也”和“又”衔接功能的交叉现象,即均可衔接具有类同义的并存型事件,衔接之后事件之间的关系都可以是平行并列关系和追述关系。根据事件本身语义特点和事件内部结构特点的不同进行分类,总结出:“也”衔接的多为褒义、中性意义的事件;“也”衔接的事件主体不同时,语义控制在前,表现为一个大主题关涉下的各个子事件,各个事件之间并列存在,有追述关系;感情色彩方面为客观地对大话题进行详细地阐述,不带过多的主观化感情色彩。“又”多衔接包含有消极意义的事件,若衔接事件主体相同的、具有类同义的事件,其后一般跟有后续语句,表示出句法走向发生转折;“又”衔接事件的主体不同时,语义控制可在前,也可在后,若在前,则事件之间有补充关系,若在后,则一般为总结、阐述事件累加之后对结果的影响;感情色彩方面表现为衔接之后对消极语义进行累加,体现出埋怨、不如意、消极的感情色彩。
[Abstract]:In this paper, after analyzing the semantic correspondence between the use of dominant synonymous markers and "also", the author puts forward the point of view on the semantic meaning of "also": this paper holds that the basic meaning of "also" is the synonym of class, and on the basis of the synonym of class, the meaning of "also" comes into being. Class synonyms are mainly expressed by dominant synonyms, but also by synonyms. With the substitution of dominant synonyms and synonyms, the synonyms gradually weaken and are reflected in the deep semantics. And the significance of tracing constantly appears. There are three different semantics: repeated meaning, successive meaning and cumulative meaning. This paper examines the event cohesion function of modern Chinese adverbs "Ya" and "Hui". It is considered that "also" can be connected with co-existing events, and "also" co-existing events can be further divided into two categories and eleven subcategories from the angle of the relationship between events. The author thinks that "also" can link up coherent events and coexisting events, and then divides into eight categories according to the semantic relationship between post-cohesive events. This paper compares the cohesive functions of "also" and "also", and holds that "also" can only connect with co-existing events, "also" can link up with coherent events and co-existing events, and that there must be synonyms between "also" and "also" events. Moreover, it is an event of smooth development, which can link up relatively independent, non-dependent non-concomitant development events. This paper mainly discusses the intersecting phenomenon of "also" and "re" cohesion functions, that is, all of them can be connected with coexisting events with similar synonyms, and the relations between events after cohesion can be parallel and parallel relations and tracing relations. According to the different semantic characteristics of events and the characteristics of internal structure of events, it is concluded that: the cohesion of "also" is mostly positive and neutral events, the event subject of "also" cohesion is not the same time, the semantic control is ahead. It is shown as each sub-event related to a big theme, each event exists side by side, and there is a tracing relationship; the emotional color aspect is to expound the big topic in detail objectively, without taking too much subjective emotion color. "also" contains events with negative meanings. If the subject of the cohesive event is the same, the event of similar synonym is usually followed by a subsequent sentence, which indicates that the syntactic direction of the event has a turning point; and the subject of the cohesive event is not at the same time, Semantic control can be before or after, if before, there is a complementary relationship between events, if at the end, it is generally a summary, explaining the effect of the event accumulation on the result; emotional color is shown as the accumulation of negative semantics after cohesion. Reflects the complaint, dissatisfactory, negative emotional color.
【学位授予单位】:华东师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:H146
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 高林波;张维微;;副词“再”和“又”的多角度分析[J];长春大学学报;2008年11期
2 熊维俊;;基于事件域认知模型和结构边界原则的二语写作教学构想[J];赤峰学院学报(科学教育版);2011年04期
3 张义;;副词“又”和“再”的对比分析——针对对外汉语教学中常见问题的解释[J];长沙铁道学院学报(社会科学版);2010年02期
4 陈鸿瑶;吴长安;;“也”字独用语篇衔接功能的视角化阐释[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2009年03期
5 陈鸿瑶;;副词“也”主观性的认知解释[J];东北师大学报(哲学社会科学版);2012年02期
6 戴浩一;黄河;;时间顺序和汉语的语序[J];国外语言学;1988年01期
7 秦洪武;崔蓉;;事件共指与话语连贯[J];当代语言学;2009年01期
8 朱波;;对外汉语教学中副词“又”的用法补议[J];大理学院学报(社会科学);2006年11期
9 仲兆满;刘宗田;李存华;;事件本体模型及事件类排序[J];北京大学学报(自然科学版);2013年02期
10 张明尧;;基于事件链的汉语语篇连贯资源建设[J];长江学术;2013年03期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 姚小鹏;汉语副词连接功能研究[D];上海师范大学;2011年
2 冯文贺;汉语连词及其相关结构的依存分析[D];武汉大学;2011年
3 樊友新;从事件结构到句子结构[D];华东师范大学;2010年
4 李国宏;基于主观性理论的汉语镜像成分句法和语义功能研究[D];上海外国语大学;2013年
5 张明尧;基于事件链的语篇连贯研究[D];武汉大学;2013年
,本文编号:1859977
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1859977.html