20世纪辞规研究的回顾与思考

发布时间：2018-05-15 21:28

本文选题：辞规 + 一般性修辞　；参考：《社会科学辑刊》2011年05期

【摘要】：自陈望道提出积极修辞、消极修辞两大分野以来,修辞学的研究主要集中在特殊性修辞特别是辞格研究上,而对一般性修辞则仅仅提出了意义明确、伦次通顺、词句平匀、安排稳密等标准,着重于词语的锤炼、句式选择等方面的研究,并不像特殊性修辞研究那样深入、系统,因而造成了修辞学体系的严重失衡。20世纪80年代,在吴士文的倡导和带领下,进一步开展了对一般性修辞特别是辞规的研究,探讨了辞规建立的理论基础、事实依据及目的,提出了辞规的定义及特点,区分了辞规与辞格,明确了辞规建立的途径等,拟建了50多个辞规。这些研究丰富和发展了中国修辞学,使其体系得到进一步完善。但辞规的研究还处在草创期,在辞规的定名、定量、定性及分类等方面还存在许多问题,有必要做更深入的思考和研究。
[Abstract]:Since Chen Wangdao put forward the distinction between positive rhetoric and negative rhetoric, the study of rhetoric has mainly focused on the study of specific rhetoric, especially on rhetorical figures, while on the general rhetoric, it has only put forward the following points: clear meaning, smooth times, even words and sentences, etc. Arranging the standard of keeping secret, focusing on the study of words and phrases, the choice of sentence structure, etc., is not as deep and systematic as the study of special rhetoric, thus causing a serious imbalance in the rhetorical system in the 1980s. Under the initiative of Wu Shiwen, the author further studies the general rhetoric, especially the rhetoric rules, probes into the theoretical basis, the factual basis and the purpose of the establishment of the rhetoric rules, puts forward the definition and characteristics of the rhetoric rules, and distinguishes the rhetoric rules from the rhetoric figures. Clear the way to set up the rules and so on, planned to build more than 50 ci rules. These studies enrich and develop Chinese rhetoric and further improve its system. However, the study of ci rules is still in the early stage, and there are still many problems in the naming, quantification, qualitative and classification of ci rules, so it is necessary to do more in-depth thinking and research.
【作者单位】：辽宁大学文学院;华中科技大学中国语言研究所;
【分类号】：H15

【共引文献】