基于标记理论的现代汉语重叠研究

发布时间：2018-05-16 06:38

本文选题：基式 + 重叠式　；参考：《新疆师范大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：根据性质，可以将重叠分为构词重叠、构形重叠和语用重叠。这三种重叠在形式和意义上并不是互不相干各自存在的。运用标记理论，特别是发展了的标记理论中的相对模式和关联模式，不仅可以判定重叠形式相对于基式是有标记项，而且对基式和重叠式的内部的研究是连续的、同其他范畴是相关的。全文共分为六部分：第一章绪论部分说明了研究的目的与意义，采用的理论和方法、重叠研究的现状。第二章运用标记理论对现代汉语重叠式进行分析。首先说明重叠产生的原因。任意性和象似性是重叠产生的根本原因，语言韵律的配合、语用原则、语言的类推机制是重叠和基式以及重叠内部不对称的原因。运用标记理论判定有无标记的标准，判别重叠是有标记项。介绍了标记理论中的相对模式和关联模式，贯穿于以下章节的的研究。第三章阐述了基式内部的区别，即在形式上为无标记的基式内部存在分化。从能否实现质量层级转化、词类和语义、色彩义、音节四个方面论述了可重叠的基式和不可重叠基式的典型范畴。第四章分析了基式和重叠式之间的不对称。根据重叠式表量的语法意义，可以对“量”进行分类，并划分了表量区间，指出同其他表量形式的互斥和互补。在语义方面，重叠式在基式的基础上进行缺略、偏重和分化。在句法功能方面，重叠式表现出其他表量形式所不具备的特殊功能。重叠式一般和肯定相关联。有时重叠的产生是音节搭配的需要。第五章对现代汉语词典中的重叠形式进行考察，认为构词重叠，尤其是形容词性质的构词重叠对现代汉语形容词构形重叠的形式和意义有深远影响。结语部分总结了全文的主要观点，将三种性质的重叠联系起来，认为标记理论对重叠的形式和发展规律有强解释力。
[Abstract]:According to its nature, reduplication can be divided into lexical overlap, configuration overlap and pragmatic overlap. These three overlaps do not exist separately in form and meaning. The use of marker theory, especially the relative pattern and the correlation pattern in the developed marking theory, can not only determine that the overlapping form is a marked term relative to the basis, but also that the study of the interior of the basis and the reduplication is continuous. Related to other categories. The full text is divided into six parts: The first chapter introduces the purpose and significance of the research, the theory and method adopted, and the current situation of overlapping research. The second chapter analyzes the reduplication of modern Chinese by using Markedness Theory. First of all, explain the cause of overlap. Arbitrariness and iconicity are the root causes of reduplication. The coordination of language prosody pragmatic principles and the analogy mechanism of language are the causes of overlap and basis and the internal asymmetry of reduplication. Using marker theory to judge the criteria of whether there are markers or not, to distinguish overlap is a marked term. This paper introduces the relative pattern and the correlation pattern in Markedness Theory, which are studied in the following chapters. In the third chapter, the difference of the interior of the basis is explained, that is, the internal differentiation of the base is unmarked in form. This paper discusses the typical categories of repeatable and non-overlapping bases from four aspects: whether the quality level can be transformed, part of speech and semantics, color meaning and syllable. In chapter 4, the asymmetry between the basis and the reduplication is analyzed. According to the grammatical meaning of reduplicated table quantity, "quantity" can be classified, the interval of table quantity is divided, and the mutual exclusion and complementation with other forms of table quantity are pointed out. In the semantic aspect, the reduplication is based on the basis of the lack of strategy, emphasis and differentiation. In terms of syntactic functions, reduplication shows special functions that other table forms do not have. Reduplication is generally associated with certainty. Sometimes overlapping is the need for syllable matching. Chapter five investigates the overlapping forms in modern Chinese dictionaries, and concludes that the reduplication of word formation, especially adjective reduplication, has a profound influence on the form and significance of adjective reduplication in modern Chinese. The conclusion part summarizes the main points of view of the full text, connecting the three properties of overlap, and holds that the mark-up theory has a strong power to explain the form and development of overlap.
【学位授予单位】：新疆师范大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】