汉语运动事件词化类型的历时转移

发布时间：2018-06-02 17:26

本文选题：运动事件 + 词化类型　；参考：《中国语文》2011年06期

【摘要】：本文主要从形态—句法属性的角度,对汉语运动事件词化类型的历时演化过程做了类型学考察,初步结论是:1)历时来看,罗曼语运动事件词化类型表现出从S型(satellite-framed)到V型(verb-framed)演化的倾向(S→V)。相反,汉语史则表现出V→S演化倾向;2)上古汉语确实表现出较强的V型语倾向,但以往关于上古汉语是典型V型语或西班牙语是V型语的论断与事实不甚相符。通过多用路径动词单动式的语用手段是上古汉语保持V型倾向的重要策略。相对而言,现代汉语表现出S型语倾向,但不甚典型;3)汉语和罗曼语词化类型的历时演化不但呈反向走势,演化机制基本上也是反向的,罗曼语主要采取强词汇化和语义要素融合,汉语则主要是语法化和语义要素分离,格式类推作用明显;4)现代汉语和罗曼语词化结构都呈多样性,这是各自的历史演化及古代语言词化结构在现代的遗存所致。
[Abstract]:From the perspective of morphological and syntactic attributes, this paper makes a typological study on the diachronic evolution of the lexicalization of Chinese motion events. The preliminary conclusion is: 1) diachronic. The lexicalization of motion events in Romance shows a tendency of evolution from type S satellite to type V verb-framed). On the other hand, the history of Chinese shows a tendency of "V" evolution. (2) the ancient Chinese did show a strong tendency of V-language, but the previous argument that the ancient Chinese is a typical V-language or Spanish is a V-language does not accord with the facts. It is an important strategy for the ancient Chinese to maintain the V-type tendency through the pragmatic means of multi-path verbs. Comparatively speaking, modern Chinese shows a tendency of S language, but it is not very typical.) the diachronic evolution of Chinese and Romanization not only shows the reverse trend, but also the mechanism of evolution is reverse. Romanization mainly adopts strong lexicalization and semantic element fusion, while Chinese is mainly grammaticalization and semantic element separation. This is the result of their historical evolution and the modern remains of the ancient language lexicalization structure.
【作者单位】：浙江大学汉语史研究中心/语言与认知研究中心;
【基金】：浙江大学“中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金”、浙江大学“董氏文史哲研究奖励基金资助项目”、“浙江大学汉语史研究中心资助项目”(编号:2011A)资助
【分类号】：H14

【参考文献】