《毛传》植物名训释研究
发布时间:2018-06-05 22:06
本文选题:《毛传》 + 植物名 ; 参考:《内蒙古师范大学》2014年硕士论文
【摘要】:《诗经》是我国第一部诗歌总集,收录了上起西周初年下迄春秋时期五百多年的诗歌。其中记载的内容具有丰富的研究价值,无数学者对其进行过各方面的研究。在训诂方面,西汉毛亨所著《毛诗故训传》是我国现存最早,体例最完备,对后世影响最大的一部诗经传注。它体例完备,创造了很多义例,释词简单精要,注重实证考据,是“诗经汉学”里程碑意义的著作。对于《诗经》的名物研究,相关论著已经颇丰,但对于《毛传》的研究,多在其注疏及名物考证方面,其中也涉及一些训释方面的理论,但比较零散,不成系统。所以本文拟从词语训释的角度对《毛传》植物名进行深入系统的研究。 本文的研究内容主要有以下几个方面: 一、对于《毛传》中训释的植物词进行类别划分,对某些存在争议的植物进行归类辩证。首先,对《毛传》中的草类和木类植物按植物的功能和属性进行分类,有多种功能的按其主要功能归类。拟草类划分为七类,木类分为三类。然后对《毛传》中出现的与其它各家产生争议的植物通过综合比较分析,得出结论 二、对《毛传》中的植物名训释从词训和语训的角度进行分析。拟从同义训释、描述式训释、综合训释这三个方面对《毛传》中的植物名训释进行详细介绍。在词义训释里既有概念义的训释,也有语境义的训释,本章将会对此进行论述。 三、对《毛传》中的植物名训释的文化涵义进行解释。从植物的功能、颜色、味道、气味、形态、生长习惯、品性几个方面对《毛传》训释中的文化内涵追根溯源,找出依据。 最后,,对《毛传》植物名训释的成就与不足进行总结。鲁人毛亨生于战国末期,师授儒家一代大师荀子,继承了孔门诗学体系,秉承孔门严谨家风;他博览古籍,博学多才,吸收各家精华,去其虚妄,在前人训诂成果的基础上,形成一套较为完备的训诂体系。《毛传》是先秦至秦汉之际训诂的集大成者。然由于时代和阶级的局限,《毛传》训释中也有缺点和不足,但瑕不掩瑜,它不愧是一部划时代的经典。
[Abstract]:The Book of songs is the first collection of poems in China, which includes more than 500 years from the beginning of the Western Zhou Dynasty to the Spring and Autumn period. The recorded content has rich research value, and numerous scholars have studied it in all aspects. In the aspect of exegesis, Mao Heng's "the Book of songs" by Mao Heng in the Western Han Dynasty is one of the earliest extant poems in China, which has the most complete style and has the greatest influence on later generations. Its style is complete, it has created a lot of semantic examples, the explanation of ci is simple and refined, and it pays attention to empirical textual research, which is a landmark work in the Book of songs and Sinology. For the study of famous objects in the Book of songs, there have been a lot of related works, but for the study of Mao Zhuan, most of them involve some theories of explanation and explanation, but they are scattered and unsystematic. Therefore, this paper intends to make a deep and systematic study on the plant names from the perspective of lexical explanation. The main contents of this paper are as follows: Firstly, the plant words in Mao Zhuan are classified, and some controversial plants are classified and dialectically. Firstly, the grass and wood plants are classified according to their functions and attributes, and the plants with many functions are classified according to their main functions. Grass is divided into seven categories, wood is divided into three categories. Then through the comprehensive comparative analysis of the plants in Mao Biography and other controversial plants, the conclusion is drawn. Second, the explanation of plant names in Mao Zhuan is analyzed from the angle of word training and language training. In this paper, the plant names in Mao Zhuan are introduced in detail from three aspects: synonymous explanation, descriptive explanation and comprehensive explanation. There are both conceptual and contextual explanations in the explanation of word meaning, which will be discussed in this chapter. Third, explain the cultural meaning of plant name explanation in Mao Biography. From the function, color, taste, smell, morphology, growth habit and character of the plant, the root of the cultural connotation in the interpretation of "Mao Biography" is traced back to find out the basis. Finally, the achievements and shortcomings of plant name explanation are summarized. Born in the late warring States period, Mao-heng of Lu was born in the late warring States period. Xunzi, a master of Confucianism, inherited the Confucian poetics system and inherited the rigorous style of Confucius. He reviewed ancient books, learned many talents, absorbed the essence of various schools, and eliminated their falsehood, on the basis of the results of previous exegesis. A complete exegesis system was formed. Mao Zhuan was the epitome of exegesis from pre Qin to Qin and Han dynasties. However, due to the limitations of the times and classes, there are shortcomings and shortcomings in the interpretation of Mao Zhuan, but it is a epoch-making classic.
【学位授予单位】:内蒙古师范大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2014
【分类号】:H131
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 闫艳;《汉语大词典》蔬菜词语补正二则[J];古汉语研究;2001年02期
2 胡继明;《毛传》与《尔雅·释训》[J];古籍整理研究学刊;1996年03期
3 王承略;《毛诗故训传》标“兴”含义新解[J];晋阳学刊;2003年03期
4 祝敏彻;尚春生;;论“毛传”、“郑笺”的异同[J];兰州大学学报;1983年01期
5 王建莉;;《尔雅》异名理据的特征[J];内蒙古师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2005年06期
6 王宁;;《诗经》中的几种植物考[J];西安文理学院学报(社会科学版);2006年06期
本文编号:1983560
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/wenyilunwen/hanyulw/1983560.html