泛义动词“搞”的多角度研究

发布时间：2018-06-08 23:22

本文选题：“搞” + 语义特征　；参考：《延边大学》2012年硕士论文

【摘要】：本文以泛义动词“搞”为研究对象,详细分析了“搞”在汉语中出现的语境,采取形式与意义、共时与历时、归纳与分析相结合的方法,在吸收专家学者成果的基础上,探讨和分析了“搞”的句法、语义、语用功能和“搞”的历史演变过程。全文共分五章,具体内容大致如下：第一章,绪论,介绍了本文的研究目的及意义、研究思路和方法以及语料来源,总结了前人的相关研究成果,对“搞”的意义进行了限定,在前人研究的基础上提出自己的观点,即“搞”是一个泛义动词。第二章,在语义方面,本文通过对“搞”在具体语境中的意义进行描写,研究“搞”的语义特征：“搞”主要有泛义性、虚义性、口语色彩浓、含贬义倾向等语义特征。并辨析“搞”和“弄”语义的异同点,进一步分析“搞”的意义。第三章,在句法层面,主要考察“搞”的述宾结构、述补结构,并对“搞”的重叠式着重分析。“搞”的宾语大多是名词性的,有些情况下也可接动词宾语；“搞”的述补结构要相对复杂。“搞”重叠式表达的意义是小量、短时,语法功能既有和一般动词共同的地方,也有自己独有的方面。本章还对“搞”字进行了“格语法”理论分析,这是本文创新点。第四章,从语用方面看,“搞”的语用功能主要有：模糊功能、替代功能、关系功能。本章对“弄”的模糊功能的意义和表现进行了分析和研究；对“搞”的替代功能的表现,“搞”所能替代及不能替代的动词以及“搞”的替代功能的作用进行了研究；对“搞”的关系功能的表现进行了分析。此外,本章还分析了句子中省去“搞”的情况,分析了“搞”与语境的关系,“搞”的修辞功能,“搞”的语用价值。最后是结语部分,对本文的内容进行概括和总结,指出本文的不足之处。
[Abstract]:This paper takes the pan-meaning verb "doing" as the research object, analyzes the context of "doing" in detail in Chinese, adopts the methods of form and meaning, synchronic and diachronic, induces and analyzes, on the basis of absorbing the achievements of experts and scholars. This paper discusses and analyzes the syntactic, semantic, pragmatic functions and historical evolution of "doing". The whole paper is divided into five chapters. The specific contents are as follows: chapter one, introduction, introduces the purpose and significance of this paper. The research ideas and methods as well as the source of the corpus, summarizes the related research results of predecessors, limits the meaning of "doing", and puts forward its own viewpoint on the basis of previous studies, that is, "go" is a universal verb. In terms of semantics, this paper describes the meaning of "doing" in the specific context, and studies the semantic characteristics of "doing": "doing" mainly has the semantic characteristics of universality, hypocrisy, strong colloquial color and tendency of derogatory meaning. It also analyzes the similarities and differences between the semantics of "doing" and "making", and further analyzes the meaning of "doing". Chapter three, at the syntactic level, mainly examines the structure of "doing" and the structure of "making", and emphasizes on the superposition of "doing". The object of "do" is mostly nominal, and in some cases it can be followed by verb object. The meaning of "do" reduplicative expression is small quantity, short time, grammatical function has common place with common verb, also has its own unique aspect. This chapter also analyzes the "case grammar" of the word "go", which is the innovation of this paper. In the fourth chapter, from the pragmatic point of view, the pragmatic functions of "do" are mainly as follows: vague function, substitution function and relational function. This chapter analyzes and studies the meaning and expression of fuzzy function of "Nong", the expression of substitution function of "doing", the verb which can be replaced by "doing" and the function of substitute function of "doing". The performance of the relationship function of "engaging" is analyzed. In addition, this chapter also analyzes the situation of omitting "doing" in the sentence, the relationship between "doing" and context, the rhetorical function of "doing", and the pragmatic value of "doing". Finally, it is the conclusion part, which summarizes and summarizes the content of this paper. The deficiency of this paper is pointed out.
【学位授予单位】：延边大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2012
【分类号】：H146

【参考文献】